PY Online Forums - Bringing the Pontiac Hobby Together

PY Online Forums - Bringing the Pontiac Hobby Together (https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/forums/index.php)
-   Pontiac - Street (https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=418)
-   -   Strange Place For The Thrust Bearing (https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=835223)

74SDformula 10-29-2019 10:04 PM

Strange Place For The Thrust Bearing
 
3 Attachment(s)
A guy I know, is working on a '72 TA for a customer. I went and looked at it a few weeks ago just out of curiosity. They already knew it had the wrong heads but we also found that it had a SR block. Well the engine got removed so the correct 7F6 heads could be installed. I went back down to check out the short block and check the VIN on the transmission and this is what I found. I never cease to be amazed at the stupid stuff people can do.

694.1 10-29-2019 10:16 PM

"If it fits, it ships!"
I have seen that as well. Funny, they can run a long time that way.

Rocky Rotella 10-29-2019 10:59 PM

Any chance you might know what the SR number is on the block?

steve25 10-30-2019 07:40 AM

Holly crap!
Are those indeed factory Moraine 400 series main Bearings in those main journals, as that's not a factory timing chain?

Any port in a storm I guess! That is when parts need to get off the assembly line and into the replacement parts stream!

I guess there was vastly different levels of quality control and scrutiny with low production number motors.

Well atleast the customer/ owner got a correct replacement 4 bolt main block like he should have if indeed that was assembled like that from day 1.

steve v 10-30-2019 07:59 AM

The #1 main cap looks like it's not even touching the block on the left side in the first pic. I'm surprised that it held together for any length of time.
I hope they plan on going thru the short block too.

Rocco Testa 10-30-2019 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steve v (Post 6076870)
The #1 main cap looks like it's not even touching the block on the left side in the first pic. I'm surprised that it held together for any length of time.
I hope they plan on going thru the short block too.

I was just going to say the same thing until I saw your reply. Ive seen pistons and rod in backwards but that's a first for me.

steve25 10-30-2019 12:13 PM

Also the snout of that Crank looks kinda beat in spots like the Balancer was walking some!

74SDformula 11-24-2019 11:00 PM

3 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rocky Rotella (Post 6076793)
Any chance you might know what the SR number is on the block?

Here you go.

Rocky Rotella 11-25-2019 06:54 AM

Thank you! And I'm assuming this is an otherwise basic 485428 casting?

74SDformula 11-25-2019 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rocky Rotella (Post 6084665)
Thank you! And I'm assuming this is an otherwise basic 485428 casting?

Yes.

Rocky Rotella 11-25-2019 01:41 PM

Thanks for the clarification on the casting number.

With that 1973 cast date, it coincides with the fact that all 485428 SR blocks produced around that time were equipped with 4-bolt main caps. Not that it likely matters from an originality standpoint, but that's probably the original SR block for the particular '72 Trans Am.

ponjohn 11-25-2019 04:40 PM

I had no idea they numbered the SR blocks.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:16 AM.