View Single Post
  #35  
Old 02-02-2024, 12:05 AM
Cliff R's Avatar
Cliff R Cliff R is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mount Vernon, Ohio 43050
Posts: 18,046
Default

"In fact, in 2008, the Comp #995 spring increased its rate significanty while the part number remained the same. This caused quite a few problems for the Pontiac community."

I was hired around that time to assemble a Pontiac 455 engine where the owner had a "falling out" with the machine shop/engine builder he was using. I chose NONE of the parts being used, just assemble, dyno and get it ready for the customer to pick-up.

It came with a complete Comp Cam kit, cam, lifters, springs and retainers. They were part number 995's. They looked really "beefy" and as I always do I pulled out the spring tester to measure them with the retainers supplied. They were 160lbs on the seat and 380lbs over the nose for the cam being used.

YIKES, a flat tappet cam with that much spring pressure in an engine that will only see maybe 5500-5600rpms. Cripe that's like having 16 fat guys standing on your pushrods!

I actually called Comp Cams tech line and asked them why so much pressure? The tech told me they will loose ten percent of their pressure during "run-in". I asked him if that was before or after they knocked all the lobes off the cam?

I ended up getting some different springs with considerably LESS seat and open pressure and the engine was fine on the dyno and far as I know still running out there someplace......

__________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a Veteran!
https://cliffshighperformance.com/
73 Ventura, SOLD 455, 3740lbs, 11.30's at 120mph, 1977 Pontiac Q-jet, HO intake, HEI, 10" converter, 3.42 gears, DOT's, 7.20's at 96mph and still WAY under the roll bar rule. Best ET to date 7.18 at 97MPH (1/8th mile),
The Following User Says Thank You to Cliff R For This Useful Post: