View Single Post
  #92  
Old 07-02-2020, 08:15 AM
etd66ss etd66ss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 159
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 11th Indian View Post
I always thought the 72 was cheap compared to the 68,69 and 70 because it’s a low compression engine and the performance is nothing to write home about. I felt I got a great deal on my completely numbers matching 72 because it was a bench seat – manual everything 3 speed stick with an open rear.. Maybe having the base 400 saved it from being beat up? The busy front end is also not a selling feature.

My plan was to keep all the stock parts and modify it to my specifications with some of the money I saved on the purchase price.
When I was shopping around for a GTO, I learned that no matter how much you make it “better”, bone stock numbers matching originality equals higher selling price, and lower output years are looked down upon.
Have you started your restotation yet?

__________________
SOLD 72 GTO: http://imgur.com/a/NvOUg

My Chevelle project: https://imgur.com/a/v2PHi#0