FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Early engine engineering questions
I am working on a 57 347.
First question is, why are there "vents" on the exhaust side of the head to the intake valve guides, that have corresponding grooves on the intake valves? Why are the openings into the block closed at the timing cover? If you run coolant into the cyl heads and then out the intake, is the engine really getting cooled? Are there any overheating issues on the engines that use the transfer tubes from the timing cover to the heads? Any insight would be appreciated! |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Both of your first two questions are best answered in the Pontiac shop manual. Until I (or you) get around to looking at the manual, here's what I recall-
1) The intake guide vent passages were an attempt to reduce oil consumption ("positive" stem seals hadn't yet been developed). 2. The total capacity of the cooling system was "normal", with no inherent problems. The main justification Pontiac gave for the reverse cooling was to allow valve seats simply cut into the "native" head material (the water distribution tubes were an important aspect of this reasoning). A secondary reason was the faster heating of the crankcase (coolant transferring combustion heat to the block) to hasten evaporation of sludge-causing vapors from the crankcase.
__________________
Anybody else on this planet campaign a M/T hemi Pontiac for eleven seasons? ... or has built a record breaking DOHC hemi four cylinder Pontiac? ... or has driven a couple laps of Nuerburgring with Tri-Power Pontiac power?(back in 1967) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
It just seems to me that if the guides get a little loose, there is an awful dirty vacuum leak! |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
No oil out, just eight "vacuum leaks", as you noted.
__________________
Anybody else on this planet campaign a M/T hemi Pontiac for eleven seasons? ... or has built a record breaking DOHC hemi four cylinder Pontiac? ... or has driven a couple laps of Nuerburgring with Tri-Power Pontiac power?(back in 1967) |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
And as I recall the problem the holes to make a vacuum leak to the valve guides that was supposed to bleed off vacuum so oil wouldn't get sucked down the guides was a fix that didn't fix much and a lot of the heads had the holes plugged by dealer mechanics.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for clearing all that up!
I am so accustomed to later style engines, that I wondered if it was a design that was ineffective and there for changed in the later years. In reality, it probably just saved money on production costs |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
A lot of the plugged holes in castings were there to hold the mold core. Yes a lot are called freeze plugs because they may pop out and save the block when freezing but they were originally intended to hold the mold core.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Considering how these era engines are cooled, I am guessing that the front holes in the block were used as core holes. Rather then plugging them like the side ones, they used the timing cover instead?
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Since some of the early engines had "reverse' flow the block holes in this situation were probably for core support but came the flow return that went past a thermostat to the radiator. Would need an old picture of the original engine configuration to convince myself that was the way it went.
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Those large holes in the front of block identified by you as "core support holes" (good info!) were sealed off in the reverse flow engines by the timing cover. In the "conventional flow" engines those holes were matched to water output ports in the front cover and used to deliver water from the water pump into the engine block. Reverse flow engines pumped water into the heads and later conventional flow engines pumped water into the block through those holes. |
Reply |
|
|