Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-14-2013, 09:19 PM
phoenixpnr phoenixpnr is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Keymar, Maryland
Posts: 337
Default Early engine engineering questions

I am working on a 57 347.
First question is, why are there "vents" on the exhaust side of the head to the intake valve guides, that have corresponding grooves on the intake valves?

Why are the openings into the block closed at the timing cover? If you run coolant into the cyl heads and then out the intake, is the engine really getting cooled?

Are there any overheating issues on the engines that use the transfer tubes from the timing cover to the heads?

Any insight would be appreciated!

  #2  
Old 03-15-2013, 03:36 AM
Jack Gifford's Avatar
Jack Gifford Jack Gifford is offline
formerly 'Pontiac Jack'
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Phelps, NY 14532
Posts: 10,180
Default

Both of your first two questions are best answered in the Pontiac shop manual. Until I (or you) get around to looking at the manual, here's what I recall-
1) The intake guide vent passages were an attempt to reduce oil consumption ("positive" stem seals hadn't yet been developed).
2. The total capacity of the cooling system was "normal", with no inherent problems. The main justification Pontiac gave for the reverse cooling was to allow valve seats simply cut into the "native" head material (the water distribution tubes were an important aspect of this reasoning). A secondary reason was the faster heating of the crankcase (coolant transferring combustion heat to the block) to hasten evaporation of sludge-causing vapors from the crankcase.

__________________
Anybody else on this planet campaign a M/T hemi Pontiac for eleven seasons?
... or has built a record breaking DOHC hemi four cylinder Pontiac?
... or has driven a couple laps of Nuerburgring with Tri-Power Pontiac power?(back in 1967)
  #3  
Old 03-15-2013, 06:11 PM
phoenixpnr phoenixpnr is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Keymar, Maryland
Posts: 337
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Gifford View Post
Both of your first two questions are best answered in the Pontiac shop manual. Until I (or you) get around to looking at the manual, here's what I recall-
1) The intake guide vent passages were an attempt to reduce oil consumption ("positive" stem seals hadn't yet been developed).
2. The total capacity of the cooling system was "normal", with no inherent problems. The main justification Pontiac gave for the reverse cooling was to allow valve seats simply cut into the "native" head material (the water distribution tubes were an important aspect of this reasoning). A secondary reason was the faster heating of the crankcase (coolant transferring combustion heat to the block) to hasten evaporation of sludge-causing vapors from the crankcase.
Oil consumption? Was the "extra" oil supposed to drain out of those vent tubes?
It just seems to me that if the guides get a little loose, there is an awful dirty vacuum leak!

  #4  
Old 03-16-2013, 01:55 AM
Jack Gifford's Avatar
Jack Gifford Jack Gifford is offline
formerly 'Pontiac Jack'
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Phelps, NY 14532
Posts: 10,180
Default

No oil out, just eight "vacuum leaks", as you noted.

__________________
Anybody else on this planet campaign a M/T hemi Pontiac for eleven seasons?
... or has built a record breaking DOHC hemi four cylinder Pontiac?
... or has driven a couple laps of Nuerburgring with Tri-Power Pontiac power?(back in 1967)
  #5  
Old 03-16-2013, 09:53 PM
pfilean's Avatar
pfilean pfilean is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: West Des Moines, IA
Posts: 1,935
Default

And as I recall the problem the holes to make a vacuum leak to the valve guides that was supposed to bleed off vacuum so oil wouldn't get sucked down the guides was a fix that didn't fix much and a lot of the heads had the holes plugged by dealer mechanics.

  #6  
Old 03-17-2013, 08:53 AM
Safari Larry's Avatar
Safari Larry Safari Larry is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Lancaster, CA
Posts: 508
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by phoenixpnr View Post
Why are the openings into the block closed at the timing cover?
I don't know but it may have something to do with casting of the block. Those holes were used in later years (1960 and later) for pumping water from the water pump into the block. So another possibility is that the holes were in the design to allow for either reverse or non-reverse cooling.

Quote:
If you run coolant into the cyl heads and then out the intake, is the engine really getting cooled?
Yes. Coolant enters the heads through the water distributing tubes which direct cooling water to the hottest parts of the engine, at the exhaust valves. Ports in the front of block lead directly to intake side of water pump. That creates a low pressure inside the block which causes some of the cooling water to be "sucked" into the block. During warmup prior to thermostat valve opening, all water circulates through the block resulting in quick block warmup.

Quote:
Originally Posted by phoenixpnr View Post
Are there any overheating issues on the engines that use the transfer tubes from the timing cover to the heads?
I assume you are referring to the tubes inside the heads. Pontiac calls those tubes "water distributing tubes". No reported cooling issues that I know of. It worked quite well. The shop manual has a pretty good description of the cooling. See also Pontiac Engine Cooling.

__________________
Larry Gorden
POCI 1956 Tech Adviser
www.PontiacSafari.com
  #7  
Old 03-17-2013, 09:32 AM
phoenixpnr phoenixpnr is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Keymar, Maryland
Posts: 337
Default

Thanks for clearing all that up!
I am so accustomed to later style engines, that I wondered if it was a design that was ineffective and there for changed in the later years.
In reality, it probably just saved money on production costs

  #8  
Old 03-17-2013, 01:08 PM
pfilean's Avatar
pfilean pfilean is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: West Des Moines, IA
Posts: 1,935
Default

A lot of the plugged holes in castings were there to hold the mold core. Yes a lot are called freeze plugs because they may pop out and save the block when freezing but they were originally intended to hold the mold core.

  #9  
Old 03-17-2013, 03:04 PM
phoenixpnr phoenixpnr is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Keymar, Maryland
Posts: 337
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pfilean View Post
A lot of the plugged holes in castings were there to hold the mold core. Yes a lot are called freeze plugs because they may pop out and save the block when freezing but they were originally intended to hold the mold core.
Considering how these era engines are cooled, I am guessing that the front holes in the block were used as core holes. Rather then plugging them like the side ones, they used the timing cover instead?

  #10  
Old 03-18-2013, 12:22 PM
pfilean's Avatar
pfilean pfilean is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: West Des Moines, IA
Posts: 1,935
Default

Since some of the early engines had "reverse' flow the block holes in this situation were probably for core support but came the flow return that went past a thermostat to the radiator. Would need an old picture of the original engine configuration to convince myself that was the way it went.

  #11  
Old 03-19-2013, 08:33 AM
Safari Larry's Avatar
Safari Larry Safari Larry is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Lancaster, CA
Posts: 508
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pfilean View Post
Since some of the early engines had "reverse' flow the block holes in this situation were probably for core support but came the flow return that went past a thermostat to the radiator. Would need an old picture of the original engine configuration to convince myself that was the way it went.
See the link I gave earlier for those old pictures and an explanation of water flow through the block for reverse flow (1955-59) and "conventional flow" (1960 and later) engines.

Those large holes in the front of block identified by you as "core support holes" (good info!) were sealed off in the reverse flow engines by the timing cover. In the "conventional flow" engines those holes were matched to water output ports in the front cover and used to deliver water from the water pump into the engine block. Reverse flow engines pumped water into the heads and later conventional flow engines pumped water into the block through those holes.

__________________
Larry Gorden
POCI 1956 Tech Adviser
www.PontiacSafari.com
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:07 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017