Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-24-2024, 04:45 PM
grivera's Avatar
grivera grivera is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Just south of Baltimore
Posts: 5,204
Default Valve Tip Sweep Pattern

I measured for pushrods this past weekend and came up with an interesting pattern. Because I am using HR lifters, I had to get creative - so used the method Cliff recommends. This involves extending the adjustable pushrod until it bottoms out the lifter, then adjusting accordingly for the best pattern while keeping the lifter bottomed out. Once best pattern is obtained, one subtracts the extra length ( beyond the manufacturer’s recommended preload amount) to come up with proper length. In my case, that length is 9.0375. Using a Comp Cams 7704 adjustable pushrod .
The lifters are Comp Cams Evolution lifters which have .125 of travel and recommended preload is .0625

The cam is an OF1 (236/245, ..627/…632 with Harlan’d Sharp 1.65 rockers.) Valve spring installed height is 1.83”, heads are KRE 310 cfm, originally 85cc, shaved .030 for 81cc.

Following this I contacted JBP for recommendation on pushrods to buy and sent in the pattern. The tech said with 1.65 rockers I can’t go by the sweep pattern and that I should use a 9.2” pushrod. Any thoughts/experiences with this?

Pic attached is the pattern a 9.0375 - the left of the spring is the intake/rocker stud side
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2936.jpg
Views:	113
Size:	55.3 KB
ID:	640451  

__________________
Will Rivera

'69 Firebird 400/461, 290+ E D-Ports, HR 230/236, 4l80E, 8.5 Rear, 3.55 gears
‘66 Lemans, 455, KRE D-Ports, TH350, 12 bolt 3.90 gears
'69 LeMans Vert, 350, #47 heads: work in progress

Last edited by grivera; 09-24-2024 at 05:01 PM.
  #2  
Old 09-24-2024, 05:20 PM
steve25's Avatar
steve25 steve25 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 15,346
Default

I am at a complete loss as to why with any rocker ratio being used you can’t go by the sweep pattern seen.

Maybe the person you spoke to knows that the sharps are much closer to being 1.7 and has seen that length he told you to use work better on average in actual use because that’s the only reason I think of for him to give you that length recommendation.

__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs!
And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs!

1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set.

Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks.

1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes.
Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph.

Education is what your left with once you forget things!
The Following User Says Thank You to steve25 For This Useful Post:
  #3  
Old 09-24-2024, 05:57 PM
grivera's Avatar
grivera grivera is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Just south of Baltimore
Posts: 5,204
Default

Here his message:

“With a 1.65 rocker my best guess would be a 9.200” pushrod (there’s more to it than a pattern on the valve tip) The longer rod should bring it slightly back towards center but more important the geometry through out the rocker travel will be much better.”

__________________
Will Rivera

'69 Firebird 400/461, 290+ E D-Ports, HR 230/236, 4l80E, 8.5 Rear, 3.55 gears
‘66 Lemans, 455, KRE D-Ports, TH350, 12 bolt 3.90 gears
'69 LeMans Vert, 350, #47 heads: work in progress
  #4  
Old 09-24-2024, 09:16 PM
4dblnkldude's Avatar
4dblnkldude 4dblnkldude is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: levittown
Posts: 1,910
Default

I'd go by your gut and what Steve said. That pattern looks perfect!

__________________
" Is wearing a helmet illegal" Mike Kerr 1-29-09
  #5  
Old Today, 05:41 AM
chuckies76ta's Avatar
chuckies76ta chuckies76ta is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,146
Default

You have no way to make a solid lifter to check your work? It looks like pattern is on the inboard which I understand is better than on the outer area of the pushrod. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5is9BsH5OU

__________________
68 Firebird. IA2 block, 505 cu in, SD Performance E-head, Solid roller 3600 weight. Reid TH400 4:11 gear. 29" slick.
Best so far 9.95@134 mph. 1.43 60 ft.
76 Trans am, TKX .81 o/d, 3.73 Moser rearend,
468 with KRE D-ports, Doug headers, 3" Exh.
  #6  
Old Today, 09:51 AM
grivera's Avatar
grivera grivera is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Just south of Baltimore
Posts: 5,204
Default

Chuck - As explained in opening post, the HR lifter is made “solid” by bottoming out its travel. In this case .125” of travel. A little math afterwards to determine pushrod length. This is a method Cliff uses with HR lifters.

Yesterday I lengthened my pushrod tool to 9.2” as suggested by JBP, then added .125 for to bottom out lifter travel and checked the pattern - it was way to the outer edge of the valve tip. I’m thinking 7 rotations out even though more towards the outside is the thinner pattern.

I also checked at various lengths of the pushrod tool which has a range of 8.8 - 9.8” - each rotation out is .050 . Below are pics for 9.05” (5 rotations on tool), 9.1” (6 rotations on tool), 9.15” (7 rotations on tool). For the final length I will subtract .0625 to arrive at the center of plunger travel based on Comp Cams instructions.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2971.jpg
Views:	20
Size:	69.2 KB
ID:	640534   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2970.jpg
Views:	19
Size:	120.6 KB
ID:	640535   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2969.jpg
Views:	20
Size:	70.4 KB
ID:	640536  

__________________
Will Rivera

'69 Firebird 400/461, 290+ E D-Ports, HR 230/236, 4l80E, 8.5 Rear, 3.55 gears
‘66 Lemans, 455, KRE D-Ports, TH350, 12 bolt 3.90 gears
'69 LeMans Vert, 350, #47 heads: work in progress
  #7  
Old Today, 10:35 AM
chuckies76ta's Avatar
chuckies76ta chuckies76ta is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,146
Default

I'm not disputing your work. In your original post you asked. Any thoughts/experiences with this? I've never done the measurement with bottoming out the lifter. I have always made a solid lifter and measured that way. I also made a mistake in my original post. The first pic is showing the pattern out board, which is not desirable. I included the video as this guy talks about the relationship of rocker travel. He says that at mid lift you want you roller in the center of the push-rod. My understanding is you want a narrow as possible pattern with it starting inboard, then mid point in the center then finishing out board. The other way I've checked for push-rod length is removing the inner and outer springs and using a checking spring. I believe the checking spring prevents the H/L lifter from collapsing. Just some Thoughts.

__________________
68 Firebird. IA2 block, 505 cu in, SD Performance E-head, Solid roller 3600 weight. Reid TH400 4:11 gear. 29" slick.
Best so far 9.95@134 mph. 1.43 60 ft.
76 Trans am, TKX .81 o/d, 3.73 Moser rearend,
468 with KRE D-ports, Doug headers, 3" Exh.
The Following User Says Thank You to chuckies76ta For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:19 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017