Pontiac - Race The next Level

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-26-2014, 12:58 AM
scott-462 scott-462 is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: seymour, IN
Posts: 342
Default optimal suspension setup for handling. camber ect.

As the title implies, this is for a 70 lemans sport, stock weight. It has global west 1.5 inch drop springs, unknown tubular control arms, and soon to be new shocks and sway bars. Right now, i need to get an alignment after the new suspension install and i know increased negative camber in the front will increase cornering grip at the cost of increased inner tire wear. Any thoughts or suggestions on suspension setup to make this thing corner better? Excluding tires and top shelf shocks, just mainly a question on camber, toe, caster..

__________________
1970 lemans sport. 464, ported 6X-8 heads, 1.77 EX valve, 3 angle valve job, H.S. 1.65 roller rockers, XE284, RPM intake, H beams, forged speed pro's, eagle ESP crank, Full ARP studded, Billet 4 bolt mains.
  #2  
Old 03-26-2014, 02:47 AM
Blued and Painted's Avatar
Blued and Painted Blued and Painted is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Granby Colorado
Posts: 2,431
Default

The key is in the sway bars. 1 1/4" front with urethane link and mounting bushings and minimum of a 7/8" rear bar.
There is not a huge amount of adjustment with stocks control arms.
I would shoot for 1/2 degree negative camber. Don't go over 3/4 negative.
2 to 2 1/2 degrees positive Caster If you can get it, for quick returnability.
Toe-in depends on the negative camber. 1/8" total toe-in for negative 1/2 degree camber. As much as 1/4" total toe-in for negative 3/4 camber.

Let it be written, let it be done.

__________________
Bull Nose Formula-461, 6x-4, Q-jet, HEI, TH400, 8.5 3.08, superslowjunk

Last edited by Blued and Painted; 03-26-2014 at 02:54 AM.
  #3  
Old 03-26-2014, 03:53 AM
scott-462 scott-462 is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: seymour, IN
Posts: 342
Default

There tubular control arms, not sure about adjust-ability. I was assuming more like atleast -1.5 degrees negative camber in the front..? If not between 2-3 degrees... I know this isnt exactly a race car, but their negative camber is very apparent just by looking at them.

__________________
1970 lemans sport. 464, ported 6X-8 heads, 1.77 EX valve, 3 angle valve job, H.S. 1.65 roller rockers, XE284, RPM intake, H beams, forged speed pro's, eagle ESP crank, Full ARP studded, Billet 4 bolt mains.
  #4  
Old 03-26-2014, 08:06 PM
Blued and Painted's Avatar
Blued and Painted Blued and Painted is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Granby Colorado
Posts: 2,431
Default

Two degrees in at the top is visually noticeable.
Lookat ho428's road race car. Dont think he is running anywhere near -2.
The opposite wheel would be pushing the wrong direction.
Check Post one, pic one.
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...ghlight=wheels

__________________
Bull Nose Formula-461, 6x-4, Q-jet, HEI, TH400, 8.5 3.08, superslowjunk
  #5  
Old 03-26-2014, 09:07 PM
ho428's Avatar
ho428 ho428 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 2,687
Default

I do run about 1.5-2 degrees negative Camber, still isn't enough at some tracks but I can't fit anymore shims in on the drivers side.
Generally the tires still wear more on the outside due to cornering weight bias. When I check temps the inner is hotter, but the wear pattern is outside. I'll run the tires a few races and do an inside out flip on the rims and switch L-R sides.

I run the toe neutral to 1/16 in but I'm still searching for the optimal setting on that. Since I went to 275-35's on the front she tends to wander more.
I can't recall the Caster setting, but I did the guldstrand mod on mine using modified stock A-arms.

This is strickly a track car though, I wouldn't run those camber settings on the street.

I have a better pic somewhere that shows how far they lean in. From the front it's very noticable. From the back angle it doesn't look like near as much.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	100_5609R.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	52.8 KB
ID:	358230  


Last edited by ho428; 03-26-2014 at 09:12 PM.
  #6  
Old 03-27-2014, 12:36 AM
scott-462 scott-462 is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: seymour, IN
Posts: 342
Default

Awesome car ho428. Drag racing is cool, but only last 10-12 seconds. I would love to autoX my car sometime after its ready. As long as theres sandpits on the corners, no way i'm risking hitting a wall and totaling my car. So only -1.5 to -2 degrees in the front.. I figured much more. I thought -1.5 was pretty much stock.

__________________
1970 lemans sport. 464, ported 6X-8 heads, 1.77 EX valve, 3 angle valve job, H.S. 1.65 roller rockers, XE284, RPM intake, H beams, forged speed pro's, eagle ESP crank, Full ARP studded, Billet 4 bolt mains.
  #7  
Old 03-27-2014, 08:11 AM
ho428's Avatar
ho428 ho428 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 2,687
Default

I'd go more Camber at CMP if I could, Road Atlanta and VIR seem to be ok with what I have, some guys run 3+. You might check over at the Pro Tour site, they do a lot more set ups for Auto-X.
Big difference between 40 minute races hitting 130+ on long straights and high speed turns down to slow turns, compared to 2nd gear runs running auto-X. Not saying one is better, just takes a different set up.
At $300+ a tire I need them to last awhile. To aggressive a set up and I'd chew them up in one race.

  #8  
Old 03-29-2014, 03:25 AM
scott-462 scott-462 is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: seymour, IN
Posts: 342
Default

Actually, full track racing is more of what i was intending to say. The "autox" with cones set up in a parking lot isnt of a lot of interest to me. If a few of my buddies had some performance cars and we made a bet or competition of it, i could see the appeal in that.

__________________
1970 lemans sport. 464, ported 6X-8 heads, 1.77 EX valve, 3 angle valve job, H.S. 1.65 roller rockers, XE284, RPM intake, H beams, forged speed pro's, eagle ESP crank, Full ARP studded, Billet 4 bolt mains.
  #9  
Old 03-30-2014, 04:31 PM
TCSGTO's Avatar
TCSGTO TCSGTO is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Warren,Ohio,USA
Posts: 1,679
Default

Tall ball joints will alter front geometry and give a better camber curve keeping the tires flatter in a corner instead of rolling over like stock a bodies do. This book has a wealth of info
http://scandc.com/new/node/4

__________________
68 GTO,3860#
Stock Original 400/M-20 Muncie,3.55’s
13.86 @ 100
Old combo:
462 10.75 CR,,SD 330CFM Round Port E's,Old Faithful cam,Jim Hand Continental,3.42's.
1968 Pontiac GTO : 11.114 @ 120.130 MPH

New combo:
517 MR-1,10.8 CR,SD 350CFM E's,QFT 950/Northwind,246/252 HR,9.5” 4000 stall,3.42's
636HP/654TQ
1.452 10.603 @ 125.09
http://www.dragtimes.com/Pontiac-GTO...lip-31594.html
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:01 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017