Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-25-2011, 09:46 PM
70FormulaCA's Avatar
70FormulaCA 70FormulaCA is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 491
Default Long branch manifolds on 2nd Gens?

Anyone using the "long branch" style exhaust manifolds on their 2nd Gen? Apparently, they flow better than Ram Air manifolds and I've been told only the A-body types would fit.

__________________
70 Formula 400 Auto non-A/C

Wanted: 1972 Formula HO - leads very much appreciated.
  #2  
Old 05-25-2011, 09:55 PM
muscle_collector's Avatar
muscle_collector muscle_collector is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 3,752
Default

they didnt put " long branch " manifolds on A- body cars.

  #3  
Old 05-25-2011, 09:56 PM
b-man's Avatar
b-man b-man is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sunny So Cal
Posts: 17,044
Default

The long branch manifolds can be made to fit with front crossmember modifications on both the A-body and 2nd-gens.

If you don't mind some cutting and welding, or possibly heating up some areas until they're cherry red and banging in some clearance notches with a big hammer then they can be made to fit.

  #4  
Old 05-26-2011, 01:43 AM
70FormulaCA's Avatar
70FormulaCA 70FormulaCA is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 491
Default

Okay, good to know. Maybe I'll just stick with the ram air manifolds.

__________________
70 Formula 400 Auto non-A/C

Wanted: 1972 Formula HO - leads very much appreciated.
  #5  
Old 05-26-2011, 04:53 PM
FunctionalShaker FunctionalShaker is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: A Flyover State
Posts: 2,599
Default

Like b-man said: It comes down to a matter of clearance. Even with the ram air manifolds, there's not a lot of room.

  #6  
Old 05-26-2011, 05:17 PM
T A 70's Avatar
T A 70 T A 70 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: South Lake Tahoe, CA
Posts: 631
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 70FormulaCA View Post
Anyone using the "long branch" style exhaust manifolds on their 2nd Gen? Apparently, they flow better than Ram Air manifolds and I've been told only the A-body types would fit.
Not interested in headers? You wouldn't believe how easy a set of super comps bolt in...of course then you'll need a mini starter....but I consider that an upgrade..they're nice.

  #7  
Old 05-28-2011, 12:32 AM
70FormulaCA's Avatar
70FormulaCA 70FormulaCA is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 491
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T A 70 View Post
Not interested in headers? You wouldn't believe how easy a set of super comps bolt in...of course then you'll need a mini starter....but I consider that an upgrade..they're nice.
But do headers really flow that much better than Ram Air/Long Branch manifolds?

__________________
70 Formula 400 Auto non-A/C

Wanted: 1972 Formula HO - leads very much appreciated.
  #8  
Old 05-31-2011, 11:25 AM
T A 70's Avatar
T A 70 T A 70 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: South Lake Tahoe, CA
Posts: 631
Default

Yes.

  #9  
Old 05-31-2011, 02:22 PM
bird72's Avatar
bird72 bird72 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Gila
Posts: 2,318
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T A 70 View Post
Not interested in headers? You wouldn't believe how easy a set of super comps bolt in...of course then you'll need a mini starter....but I consider that an upgrade..they're nice.
my super comps clear a regular starter...


and for other question, YES headers flow far better than any long branch.

a built 455 should see +50hp minimum with headers (and no crossflow muffler, although there are supposed to be good ones)

__________________
72 Bird
  #10  
Old 05-31-2011, 02:27 PM
T A 70's Avatar
T A 70 T A 70 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: South Lake Tahoe, CA
Posts: 631
Default

[quote=bird72;4331759]my super comps clear a regular starter...quote]

Yes, indeed it will....mine kept soaking up....older starter...replaced with a mini....love the dang thing.

  #11  
Old 05-31-2011, 10:24 PM
muscle_collector's Avatar
muscle_collector muscle_collector is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 3,752
Default

if my memory serves me correctly, many years ago they did a dyno test on a sd t/a and i think it was right around 50 hp gain with hookers over the factory manifolds.

  #12  
Old 05-31-2011, 11:13 PM
bird72's Avatar
bird72 bird72 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Gila
Posts: 2,318
Default

yes a healthy 455 responds in a huge way to opening up the exhaust. "Good" headers are the key.... and headers suck, speed bumps suck, changing oil filters is a mess you have to dump the oil on the headers basically, but they work extremely well on a 455. I regret not coating mine, they look, err, patina'd now.... If I ever build my HO ultimate motor, I see round port headers in the future. (have 96 heads now). And I would not want to try to put headers in an F body with an engine in it already, but it can be done maybe.

__________________
72 Bird
  #13  
Old 06-01-2011, 01:32 AM
PONTIAC-ONE's Avatar
PONTIAC-ONE PONTIAC-ONE is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg Manitoba
Posts: 443
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bird72 View Post
yes a healthy 455 responds in a huge way to opening up the exhaust. "Good" headers are the key.... and headers suck, speed bumps suck, changing oil filters is a mess you have to dump the oil on the headers basically, but they work extremely well on a 455. I regret not coating mine, they look, err, patina'd now.... If I ever build my HO ultimate motor, I see round port headers in the future. (have 96 heads now). And I would not want to try to put headers in an F body with an engine in it already, but it can be done maybe.
I put headers on my '73 Bird with the engine in without much fuss, the trans was out at the time and I don't recall if that made things easier or not, I think I had to remove the oil filter & it's mount temporarily and the car had to be high off the ground.
Tightening the flange bolts was the hardest part of the whole deal.

__________________
2 sons, 2 Firebirds. 1971 Formula 455, 1972/w 455 HO added.
1974 Formula 400 "retired", parts car now.
  #14  
Old 06-01-2011, 01:43 AM
70FormulaCA's Avatar
70FormulaCA 70FormulaCA is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 491
Default

Do they make shorty headers for Pontiacs?

Anyone have problems with keeping headers sealed against the heads?

__________________
70 Formula 400 Auto non-A/C

Wanted: 1972 Formula HO - leads very much appreciated.
  #15  
Old 06-01-2011, 07:22 AM
x-bird2 x-bird2 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: pa
Posts: 1,544
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by muscle_collector View Post
if my memory serves me correctly, many years ago they did a dyno test on a sd t/a and i think it was right around 50 hp gain with hookers over the factory manifolds.
that'd be mine, (formy though ;~)) and yes, right around 50. biggest issue beside the actual manifolds are the headpipe's compression bends. sticking them in is no big deal, i haven't had any sealing issues at all with them. (only 2 sets of gaskets in 11 years with the engine in and out 1/2 dozen times and the headers on and off about a dozen times) cutting the flanges makes installation and tightening a lot easier. (Header Headaches , hpp around 98-99)

  #16  
Old 06-01-2011, 09:52 AM
murphc4 murphc4 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Douglasville, GA
Posts: 137
Default

I guess the next logical question is which brand has the least problems fitting in an early bird. I'm rebuilding a 73 formula with a 455, and have been between regular manifolds and headers. I've read many stories on the forums here about problems getting the headers to fit. I'd like to run headers, but I don't want to do a lot of modifications to make them fit.

  #17  
Old 06-01-2011, 10:20 AM
muscle_collector's Avatar
muscle_collector muscle_collector is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 3,752
Default

back in the 70's and 80's, i installed many sets for myself and friends. the hookers were always the easiest to bolt up. some of the cheap 3 tube brands were very and almost impossible to bolt up the center exhaust port bolts. i always did them with the engine in the car. on a few occasions i would take out the motor mount bolts and lift the engine just slightly.

  #18  
Old 06-01-2011, 10:27 AM
T A 70's Avatar
T A 70 T A 70 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: South Lake Tahoe, CA
Posts: 631
Default

As I said, for me, Hooker SComps were easy to install with the engine/trans(4-speed) in the car. Pontiac Greg Merrick sold me a small header wrench that made the tightening up easy as well. Once installed, I re-tightened them one time after getting them hot...no leaks ever. Also, before I had them jet coated I installed them, torqued them down, removed them, then coated to prevent any potential cracks in the jet coating from the initial tightening process.

  #19  
Old 06-03-2011, 08:13 PM
speedshopmike's Avatar
speedshopmike speedshopmike is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: maryland
Posts: 2,332
Default

if it's a D-port motor i prefer the Hedmans; they have notably more ground clearance then hookers give.
my last set of super comps had both bottom primaries on both sides smashed flat (car was lowered with rancho springs).
also, hooker's ceramic coating quality went downhill the last few years imo and they also reduced their coating warranty coverage.
that may have changed in the almost a year since i closed the speedshop, esp given holley's outta bankruptcy now, but i won't use their coated stuff again.

__________________
is this thing on?
  #20  
Old 06-04-2011, 02:11 PM
LeighP's Avatar
LeighP LeighP is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,637
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 70FormulaCA View Post
Do they make shorty headers for Pontiacs?

Anyone have problems with keeping headers sealed against the heads?
Yes, Hedmans make a shorty header for D ports. From tests I've read they are roughly equivalent to the cast iron 2nd gen RA manifolds.

__________________
Regards,
Leigh
Pontiacs I’ve owned….
1960 Laurentian 283
1963 Laurentian 283
1976 Trans Am 400
1977 Trans Am 400
1951 Chieftain Flat head 6
1967 Firebird 400 convertible
1967 Firebird 400 coupe
1979 Trans Am 403
1971 Formula 455 (clone)
1969 Firebird 350
1968 Firebird 428 manual.
Sydney, Australia
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:10 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017