Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 05-26-2024, 08:05 AM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 18,858
Default

Too many things can effect the driving.Quality of fuel where you live,if you drive in a lot of stop and go traffic where your engine temps get high.There is no hard firm number IMO.Tom

  #22  
Old 05-26-2024, 09:47 AM
Formulajones's Avatar
Formulajones Formulajones is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 10,941
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by geeteeohguy View Post
What fuel are you running? I haven't been able to run #12 or #670 heads with an 068 cam and flat top TRW's for over 35 years here in CA with 91 octane gasahol being the best available pump gas. I was detonating all the time.
91 octane pump fuel for the last 20 years here in Arizona. It's all 10% plus ethanol here.

__________________
2019 Pontiac Heaven class winner

https://youtu.be/XqEydRRRwqE
  #23  
Old 05-26-2024, 10:39 AM
Stan Weiss's Avatar
Stan Weiss Stan Weiss is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 5,060
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wanton Pontan View Post
Interesting that there's still so much conflicting data on whether ~9.75:1 is too high or not....and these seem to be about the 2 most common heads I see cropping up. I'm working on resurrecting the 670 heads--which are in rough shape...and now thinking of cycling through the permutations.

Build plan is not for 0.040" over, spc-7 (4.10 lift) cam.
Now I'm thinking about going thru the paces with porting heads, trying 0.040 and 0.028" gaskets on the 6x4's. I was planning on keeping the 1.66" ext port on the 6x4....I'm starting to get a nice set of parameters.

Is there anything folks would want to see in the process?
You see this as conflicting data and I see it as accurate. There are many ways to get 9.75:1 CR and they don't all want / need the same octane. Also you then need to factor in the cam selection as another variable.

Stan

__________________
Stan Weiss/World Wide Enterprises
Offering Performance Software Since 1987
http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/carfor.htm
David Vizard & Stan Weiss' IOP / Flow / Induction Optimization - Cam Selection Software
http://www.magneticlynx.com/DV
Download FREE 14 Trial IOP / Flow Software
http://www.magneticlynx.com/DV/Flow_..._Day_Trial.php
Pontiac Pump Gas List
http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/pont_gas.htm
Using PMD Block and Heads List
http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/pont_pmd.htm
  #24  
Old 05-26-2024, 12:12 PM
Dragncar Dragncar is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Humbolt County California
Posts: 8,404
Default

Run the 6X-4 heads. Just get the CR to 9.25 and you will be fine. A little insurance does not hurt. And the difference in power in 9.75 is not worth it IMO. Long time iron head pump gas guy here.
The 6x-4 is the best D port Pontiac head they ever made. So run it.
The Super Stock guys love that head.
Run a little more cam than you would like with Rhodes lifters.
Make some power with this thing and have some fun. Do a Jim Hand port job on those things !
670 heads are the worst 400 head. Very old school, closed chamber.
All those little cuts in the later heads were 10 years ahead of their time. Swirl is good, use them.
If it were me, there would be no question on which head to run. 670s vs 6X-4 ?
Just about all the other big valve, screw in stud D ports are better than a 670.
Get your power with air flow and a little less CR. Mild port job on the X heads, put a cam in it. Rhodes will tame it down and you will still have the top end.


Last edited by Dragncar; 05-26-2024 at 12:18 PM.
  #25  
Old 05-26-2024, 12:55 PM
scott70's Avatar
scott70 scott70 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: maine
Posts: 2,226
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragncar View Post
Run the 6X-4 heads. Just get the CR to 9.25 and you will be fine. A little insurance does not hurt. And the difference in power in 9.75 is not worth it IMO. Long time iron head pump gas guy here.
The 6x-4 is the best D port Pontiac head they ever made. So run it.
The Super Stock guys love that head.
Run a little more cam than you would like with Rhodes lifters.
Make some power with this thing and have some fun. Do a Jim Hand port job on those things !
670 heads are the worst 400 head. Very old school, closed chamber.
All those little cuts in the later heads were 10 years ahead of their time. Swirl is good, use them.
If it were me, there would be no question on which head to run. 670s vs 6X-4 ?
Just about all the other big valve, screw in stud D ports are better than a 670.
Get your power with air flow and a little less CR. Mild port job on the X heads, put a cam in it. Rhodes will tame it down and you will still have the top end.
My 455 has 93cc heads , ra4 sized cam with roads max lifters and comes out to a final 9.71 cr. Cranking cylinder pressure is right at 175 psi.

__________________
72 lemans,455 e-head, UD 255/263 solid flat,3.73 gears,,,10" 4400 converter,, 6.68 at 101.8 mph,,1.44 60 ft.2007
(cam 271/278 roller)9"CC.4.11gear 6.41 at 106.32 mph 1.42 60 ft.(2009) SOLD,SOLD
1970 GTO 455 4 speed #matching,, 3.31 posi.Stock manifolds. # 64 heads.A factory mint tuquoise ,69' judge stripe car. 8.64 @ 87.3 mph on slippery street tires.Bad 2.25 60ft.Owned since 86'
  #26  
Old 05-29-2024, 01:19 AM
Dragncar Dragncar is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Humbolt County California
Posts: 8,404
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scott70 View Post
My 455 has 93cc heads , ra4 sized cam with roads max lifters and comes out to a final 9.71 cr. Cranking cylinder pressure is right at 175 psi.
Not sure what you mean. I had a 455 that had 165lbs cranking pressure that would run past that thing.
I am sure you can run 9.75 CR on a 455 with iron heads and get away with it.
Its just the OP sounds like a bit of a newbie and a little insurance is a good thing.
No one wants a blown head gasket from a bad batch of gas on a hot day.
Make the heads flow and having just over 9-1 is a good street pump gas recipe for a Pontiac.

  #27  
Old 05-30-2024, 03:43 AM
lust4speed's Avatar
lust4speed lust4speed is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Yucaipa, SoCal
Posts: 8,709
Default

My vote with the 068 cam is for 9.1 compression for 91 octane or 9.3 for 93 octane (Funny how it works out). Larger cam, lower gears, cooler climate, or cutting a deal with the devil can allow higher compression ratios. Just not worth it to chance hammering out the rod bearings with a marginal tank of gas on a nice warm summer day.

Half a point drop in compression is a 2% reduction off maximum power, but having to cut back timing to avoid detonation might cost 10%.

__________________
Mick Batson
1967 original owner Tyro Blue/black top 4-speed HO GTO with all the original parts stored safely away -- 1965 2+2 survivor AC auto -- 1965 Catalina Safari Wagon.
  #28  
Old 05-30-2024, 06:18 AM
steve25's Avatar
steve25 steve25 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 14,906
Default

Also note that not everybody’s fuel of a given octane level provides the same knock protection.
The blend of a fuel may work better at a lower or higher engine temp then another brand pump fuel of the same octane.

__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs!
And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs!

1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set.

Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks.

1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes.
Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph.

Education is what your left with once you forget things!
  #29  
Old 05-30-2024, 06:21 AM
Formulajones's Avatar
Formulajones Formulajones is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 10,941
Default

Mine likes 34 degrees total timing, that's where it dynod best and runs at the track the best.
Just 91 pump fuel with 10.13:1 and that little 068.
Tight quench and making sure the icl is where it needs to be is your friend.
If it were going to pound out rod bearings it would have done that 25 years ago. Ive put about 60,000 miles on it in just the last few years.

Things just have to be right. I do agree if someone isn't that tune savvy and/or don't pay attention to build details then by all means take some compression out of it

__________________
2019 Pontiac Heaven class winner

https://youtu.be/XqEydRRRwqE
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:24 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017