FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#221
|
||||
|
||||
Tom, someone just set new records in that class. 8.22 @160. Minimum weight is 3200, I'm pretty sure that would be 1000.
__________________
Mike McCarty You can drop the line, but you'll never kill the spirit! Pump gas 535 w/Marcella cv/1's. 11.0 compression, 4000 stall, 3.73 gears, 275 radial, to the axle exhaust, 3470# w/driver. 9.49 @ 140..........so far |
#222
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
For a Small Block type engine, 2.3 is not very difficult. However a Big Block Sportsman type build, in the 550-650 inch range, 2.3 is a tall order and the larger the engine gets, the taller the order. It can be done I have a couple that are right 'at' 2.30, not cheap builds. Billet intakes, big carbs, expensive cylinder heads, aggressive valvetrains. My 638 at 2.3 makes peak hp at 83-8400 and shifts at 9000 rpm. That's a little extreme for a sportsman engine and given the CID. Can a Pontiac do it? Not easily. Cubic inch for Cubic inch, the big bore/big valve Chevrolet or Ford has the advantage. As always, the best scenario for the HP/CID game is the smallest CID possible so you have the greatest valve and bore per CID ratio, and the most efficiency with the shorter stroke. 560-580 CID Pontiac, 2.3 per is going to be $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$. |
#223
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Outside of Comp Eliminator and Pro Stock I don't think there are allot of engines making in excess of 1.8 to 2.0 HP per cube NA. Most of the 632 Chevy's I have worked with only make around 1.8 to 1.85 per cube. Some of them have made 1.9, but that's not the norm. Not saying that there are not some that make more than that, but most do not. I would say most engines put together by the owner or the average engine builder only make around 1.4 to 1.6 HP per cube NA. Some of the guys that have kept their original combo and continue to work it will get up around 1.8, but most guy's are to impatient to work the combo until it has been maxed out.
__________________
Don Johnston DCI MOTORSPORTS LLC 330-850-5050 shop 330-628-3354 cell Designer if the DCI Tiger Heads and the NEW DCI Ram Air 5 Heads !!!!! |
#224
|
|||
|
|||
I think you nailed it Chris, $$$$$$$$$ that's what separates the wannabe's and the guy's that get it done !!!!
__________________
Don Johnston DCI MOTORSPORTS LLC 330-850-5050 shop 330-628-3354 cell Designer if the DCI Tiger Heads and the NEW DCI Ram Air 5 Heads !!!!! |
#225
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Didn't McCartys make 1400 or something? I don't know what the details are or what it actually made. Pretty sure it wasn't std bore space. |
#226
|
|||
|
|||
Been thinking, and I think 500 CID, if you're willing to run it 9500 rpm, would go 2.3 pretty easily, possibly 2.35.
One would have to 'De-Pontiac' it, however and get a little more 'modern' like your RAV heads, and probably no pushrod in the port Sorry. |
#227
|
|||
|
|||
JCyou's 609 made around 1240 I think with a highly modified version of a RA5 head. I know there are roomers floating around it made more than that, but I don't think there is any data to back them up. I think your right about 500 cubes, but I hope your wrong about the pushrod (: I know everyone is really distracted by the pushrod, but I think like anything we are not familiar with. It only takes some time and a little outside the box thinking. The more I look at this thing the more I think it can help as much as hurt, but I'm pretty determined or stubborn how ever you want to look at it LOL.
__________________
Don Johnston DCI MOTORSPORTS LLC 330-850-5050 shop 330-628-3354 cell Designer if the DCI Tiger Heads and the NEW DCI Ram Air 5 Heads !!!!! |
#228
|
|||
|
|||
I think for the pontiac bore spacing my sweet spot has been in the 460-500 CI range.A 9.2 block 440 CI engine would be my pick if I had stupid money to throw at it and it would not have a pushrod in the port.Would like a canted valve head.Tom
|
#229
|
|||
|
|||
440 would be cool. Big RPM for the big number...
Small inch stuff like 440 range, all of a sudden the bore and valve aren't so small. All of a sudden you can take all your small block data, and begin to realize you have a really big bore space small block type engine and if you operate it like that.... it'll make big power. I know people here hate talking about other brands. But consider a SBC or SBF with 2.350 inlet, a 4.375-ish bore, 3.75 Stroke, operating at 10,000 rpm. How much power could that SB make? No reason the pontiac can't apply that.... just get creative. You could even leave a dumb 7.00" rod hanging in there.... it'll still make big smoke. |
#230
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
SSAH has the same technology as Pro Stock and Comp. Maximize every single area within the combination and look outside the rules for ways to improve and make more HP. The biggest gains have come from increased RPM (Shocker). Without going into additional detail, rule changes around the valve cover rail and position are being discussed as a way to control what's under the valve cover. Calvin Hill Hill Performance 708-250-7420 |
#231
|
||||
|
||||
Give'n the port size, i think if done correct, the RAV with push rod in center could be made to flow faster and have better atomization then one without rod in middle.
BTY, since my junk build is go'n no where do to funds, mess'n with an old set of heads to see what dimple's(golf ball type) in the ports just to see how it affects fluid suspension. Wet dry vac and a spray bottle. Real red neck operation it is lol.
__________________
If you cant drive from gas pump to gas pump across the map, its not a street car. http://s207.photobucket.com/albums/b...hop/?start=100 Last edited by Region Warrior; 03-18-2015 at 05:17 PM. |
#232
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#233
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
So, I send the new check book and a new pen to who?
__________________
First Pontiac powered street car in the 7's 7.940@170.84. 3460#s |
#234
|
||||
|
||||
2.3 out of 560"+ Pontiac would cost more than even a plumber could afford...
|
#235
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
First Pontiac powered street car in the 7's 7.940@170.84. 3460#s |
#236
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#237
|
||||
|
||||
i agree on the short deck smaller c.i. approach and spinning it 9000-10000, the problem would then become the camshaft & lifter locations in the aftermarket blocks, which all are still inline wedge based, because once you try to apply a head like the Australian Prostock head (example) over a shortdeck Pontiac block the angles get increasingly worse due to the shorter deck height ...
... and the wideport wedge heads won't look good either on the short deck block as the deck height is working against you still, but all this obviously being directed at very high rpm, the valvetrain must be happy to live at 10k ... |
#238
|
||||
|
||||
Talking about the short deck block and 10,000 rpm the range should be in the 2.7 and up HP per ci.
Didn't John Marcella's 481 ci Pontiac produce over 2.3 HP per ci? Stan
__________________
Stan Weiss/World Wide Enterprises Offering Performance Software Since 1987 http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/carfor.htm David Vizard & Stan Weiss' IOP / Flow / Induction Optimization - Cam Selection Software http://www.magneticlynx.com/DV Download FREE 14 Trial IOP / Flow Software http://www.magneticlynx.com/DV/Flow_..._Day_Trial.php Pontiac Pump Gas List http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/pont_gas.htm Using PMD Block and Heads List http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/pont_pmd.htm |
#239
|
|||
|
|||
2.7 ain't gonna happen.
As for lifter bores and geometry. It would be nice to see the Dart approach to the lifter banks and just put a big old bar front to rear in the block for lifter placement. That would offer the pontiac guys room to move lifter bores dramatically. |
#240
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
... exactly Chris, to have a curved type shape to lifter valley area with built in material for custom camshaft and lifter locations could open the door for a truely high end race head based on the Pontiac b/s ... ... then the Pontiac's could become the small block to have ... Last edited by twinturrbo406; 03-19-2015 at 08:38 AM. |
Reply |
|
|