FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
A word of caution:
I don't have a 1970 Firebird, so don't know. I have a 1974 GTO. I was told by several on this forum that the RA repro manifolds would fit. And they will fit, IF you have manual steering ONLY! So found a manual steering box, and found the pitman arm is different! I don't remember ALL the modifications required (the repros are on the car); BUT THE MODIFICATIONS NECESSARY TO INSTALL THE REPROS COST DOUBLE THE COST OF THE MANIFOLDS! And I replaced the original transmission, again after I was told it would work, with one of the really wide ratio Borg-Warners. The shift linkage, when installed on a Pontiac, was right in front of the speedometer gear. Result: electronic sensor to a converter so I could use the original speedometer. All this was 20 years ago, and hopefully opinions are better founded today. And not throwing rocks at anyone; just stating reality. So the point here being is that one modification often begats 6 more; do your homework on modifications. Two of my friends had the repro exhausts on a 1974 GTO, but they had a manual box. When something is said to interchange, make certain you are compare oranges to oranges, not oranges to tangelos (which look like oranges). Jon
__________________
"Good carburetion is fuelish hot air". "The most expensive carburetor is the wrong one given to you by your neighbor". If you truly believe that "one size fits all" try walking a mile in your spouse's shoes! Owner of The Carburetor Shop, LLC (of Missouri). Current caretaker of the remains of Stromberg Caburetor, and custodian of the existing Carter and Kingston carburetor drawings. |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
For what you're goals are, stock type replacements should be fine. Get a Melling 60 psi oil pump. Pretty much any name brand double roller timing chain. Don't worry about the 3 keyway type for your build. Stock rockers, pushrods, etc will be fine. The more "exotic" you get the more likely it is you'll bring in other issues like rocker arm geometry. No matter what the claims are, you really don't gain much from rockers, especially the roller tip only style on a mild performance street engine.
__________________
[/SIGPIC] Two marriages and one long term relationship later and it's the T/A that's always still there. When referencing gas, "regular" used to have an entirely different meaning. |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Good first hand info bman & thank you! 2.64 or better, roger that 👍🏻
—- Yes, keeping the #11 heads. The carb setup will be whatever Cliff builds for us 😎 Yes we have the original distributor. —— No RA manifolds, that was already removed but thanks for the heads up. —— Melling 60psi & Double roller, roger that. Stock stuff for the rest. Only exotic parts would be a quality set of 1.5 roller rockers but only if we somehow find a crazy good deal. Thanks again guys!
__________________
************************************************** ******************* 73 TA 4 spd #'s match red/white - "STOLEN" AT TERRY SPEAR's SHOP IN Columbia TN ~mid 2014 Last offical pic of the car can been seen here: http://clubs.hemmings.com/pontiactn/...%20-%20rev.pdf People have seen it posted FS on Craigs List back in late 2013 early 2014.... ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ IF YOU HAVE ANY INFO ABOUT IT PLEASE CONTACT ME!!! |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
I'm not authority, and can't say for certain but I believe the only roller rockers for a Pontiac are 7/16. Which would require a change of the rocker studs. Easy to do if your studs are factory screw in. Much more difficult with press in studs.
__________________
[/SIGPIC] Two marriages and one long term relationship later and it's the T/A that's always still there. When referencing gas, "regular" used to have an entirely different meaning. |
The Following User Says Thank You to BDH79TA For This Useful Post: | ||
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks BDH & good point. I believe those non performance #11 heads probably have press in studs so looks like no roller rockers for us.
Side note - I called Bullet Cams & they did have a nice option for the Pontiac 350. Specs are 207*/211* .432"/.441" on a 112. Cost is $300 with a 10 week grind time. They had the lifters ($140) & springs ($100) in stock though.
__________________
************************************************** ******************* 73 TA 4 spd #'s match red/white - "STOLEN" AT TERRY SPEAR's SHOP IN Columbia TN ~mid 2014 Last offical pic of the car can been seen here: http://clubs.hemmings.com/pontiactn/...%20-%20rev.pdf People have seen it posted FS on Craigs List back in late 2013 early 2014.... ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ IF YOU HAVE ANY INFO ABOUT IT PLEASE CONTACT ME!!! |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
I’d do the 066 cam and just use all the stock rockers and pushrods. There’s nothing wrong with using your stock parts as long as they’ve been inspected carefully for excessive wear.
The press in studs will thank you. It will be plenty peppy, the 066 was used in the 350 HO automatic cars in 1968 with about 10:1 compression. With your low compression 350 and a stick shift it will run very well. Super budget-friendly and reliable. Roller rockers will definitely work, only the top portion of the studs are 3/8”, the bottom where the rocker pivots sit are 7/16”. However they’re going to buy you next to nothing in the power department so they really don’t make sense to use.
__________________
1964 Tempest Coupe LS3/4L70E/3.42 1964 Le Mans Convertible 421 HO/TH350/2.56 2002 WS6 Convertible LS1/4L60E/3.23 |
The Following User Says Thank You to b-man For This Useful Post: | ||
#27
|
||||
|
||||
Just curious... what are the durations at .050" for the 254 cam used in the 70 2bbl? Were they significantly lower than the 066 or does the 254 just have lower lift?
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
9777254 {U)# cam:
269* advertised, .374” intake / 277* advertised, .406” exhaust / 47* overlap 9779066 (N)# cam: 273* advertised, 197* @ .050”, .406” intake / 282* advertised, 206* @ .050”, .406” exhaust / 55* overlap I could only find advertised duration numbers for the 254 cam, draw your own conclusions for @ .050”.
__________________
1964 Tempest Coupe LS3/4L70E/3.42 1964 Le Mans Convertible 421 HO/TH350/2.56 2002 WS6 Convertible LS1/4L60E/3.23 |
The Following User Says Thank You to b-man For This Useful Post: | ||
#29
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
This is the "street forum" and you asked about a "street cruiser". Lots of good suggestions, however remember that an engine is a "system". Pontiac engineered their builds. You really cannot go wrong in duplicating a factory build; simply choose the one that fits your requirements. I am one of the ones that went totally overboard on a "street" 350 engine build (the only members of my family that can drive it on the street are myself and my son!). I had a reason for building it as I did, and I am not sorry I did it; but a street cruiser it is NOT. And it cost a LOT of money! There are lots of "tricks" on (maybe) increasing performance for race engines that get thrown into the street forum threads. Some have been discussed in this thread, and disputed by others as having little benefit for a "street cruiser". So bottom line on your question #4: pick the factory build that most closely matches your desires, and build it. Above all, have a plan BEFORE you start acquiring parts. And enjoy the build! Jon
__________________
"Good carburetion is fuelish hot air". "The most expensive carburetor is the wrong one given to you by your neighbor". If you truly believe that "one size fits all" try walking a mile in your spouse's shoes! Owner of The Carburetor Shop, LLC (of Missouri). Current caretaker of the remains of Stromberg Caburetor, and custodian of the existing Carter and Kingston carburetor drawings. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to carbking For This Useful Post: | ||
#30
|
||||
|
||||
Look at what you have, I have one as well.
1. Small valve heads NOT designed for high rpms. 2. 2bbl carb MORE THAN ADEQUATE for 255 hp AND 375 Torque @ cruising speeds of 2400- 2900 rpm. The specs YOUR engine has. This engine will Gain Nothing from RA manifolds , and 4bbl carb and intake and cam, EXCEPT more Hp Higher in the rpm range, shorten your Torque curve AND cost you about twice as much on gas. Most peoples opinions in this thread are NEVER based on cruising, and have their roots in drag racing and or bragging rights. You Can, or he can Enjoy it by leaving it alone ( gasp a money saving comment) The 12 bolt probably has a 3.07 gear in it ( chevy ratios in 1970 12 bolts) that ratio is fine for cruising. Don't Discount Pontiac Engineers, they DID the homework!
__________________
"The Future Belongs to those who are STILL Willing to get their Hands Dirty" .. my Grandfather |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Formulabruce For This Useful Post: | ||
#31
|
||||
|
||||
So leave it alone & keep the 2bbl carb on there.....
Where’s the fun in that?
__________________
************************************************** ******************* 73 TA 4 spd #'s match red/white - "STOLEN" AT TERRY SPEAR's SHOP IN Columbia TN ~mid 2014 Last offical pic of the car can been seen here: http://clubs.hemmings.com/pontiactn/...%20-%20rev.pdf People have seen it posted FS on Craigs List back in late 2013 early 2014.... ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ IF YOU HAVE ANY INFO ABOUT IT PLEASE CONTACT ME!!! |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
I would put a 4bbl QJ on it anyway.Smaller primarys than the 2bbl.Tom
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to tom s For This Useful Post: | ||
#33
|
||||
|
||||
And it will breathe better at higher RPM’s.
__________________
1977 Black Trans Am 180 HP Auto, essentially base model T/A. I'm the original owner, purchased May 7, 1977. Shut it off Shut it off Buddy, I just shut your Prius down... |
#34
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Upgrading the cam one step above the 254 to the 066 (used in many 4-barrel medium performance 400s and all 2-barrel 455s) should be enough to see a noticeable performance increase. It don’t see it being be a big enough change to greatly degrade low end or mid range power. Of course the original 254 cam will have a couple of heavily worn lobes so that’s out and good luck finding a new one so the 066 used in just about every regular stock rebuilt engine is pretty much your only choice if you’re wanting a mild factory cam. The small primary Q-jet carb on a factory intake gives you excellent low speed running and throttle response along with being more fuel efficient than the 2GC 2-barrel carb. It’s pretty well known here on the forums that a professionally calibrated Q-jet can run almost like fuel injection. A free flowing 2-1/2” exhaust using the stock manifolds will give the engine enough breathing to make use of the big Q-jet secondaries when you need the power. The stock manifolds lend themselves well to low speed running and response but are designed well enough for decent breathing ability. The 3.07 rear really necessitates the pairing of the right 4-speed, it won’t be the least bit fun to drive around town with a tall first gear. Even the 2.64 low is marginal, one of the Saginaw boxes with the common 2.85 low or even a Vega unit with a 3.11 first would work very well. Putting the right transmission in it will be the key to fun and spirited driving in the city, choosing the wrong one might make the project a failure.
__________________
1964 Tempest Coupe LS3/4L70E/3.42 1964 Le Mans Convertible 421 HO/TH350/2.56 2002 WS6 Convertible LS1/4L60E/3.23 |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to b-man For This Useful Post: | ||
#35
|
||||
|
||||
400 -428 ft lbs of Torque at 2400 rpms you have NEVER felt.....
__________________
"The Future Belongs to those who are STILL Willing to get their Hands Dirty" .. my Grandfather |
The Following User Says Thank You to Formulabruce For This Useful Post: | ||
#36
|
|||
|
|||
The base Firebird in 1970 with the 350, 3-spd manual with, or without AC, would come with the 3.36 10-bolt rear end standard. With an M-20 trans it would have fairly decent 1st gear multiplication of 8.47 to 1. I think adding the Summit 2800 cam (or similar) would allow you to keep your heads stock with the pressed studs and give you a little more mid-range power. Any larger cam with more lift and you'll need to convert to screw-in studs. I would definitely swap on the factory 4-bbl intake and Q-jet too. As others have mentioned previously, I would retain the factory exhaust (log) manifolds and go with 2.5" mandrel headpipes into a true dual, or Pypes crossover, exhaust system. You don't need an H or X pipe for a mild 350. This would be a budget build I would do. I would add a posi unit too...
My brother has a '69 350HO/M-20/3.55 rear Firebird, so has the large valve #48 heads, 068 cam, std. exhaust log manifolds, of course the cast iron 4-bbl intake and Q-jet and it is torquey off idle and will easily melt the tires in first gear (I acknowledge it is lighter than a '70 Firebird by 200 lbs at least, and has a lower 8.95 1st gear multiplication), but it doesn't seem to be hampered by the 068 cam (has an actual 9.9 SCR) at all. The 068 cam would be OK if you had at least 9.5 compression in your 350, but you'll never get there with the #11 heads without lots of shaving (not good) and domed pistons (expensive). Good luck with the build! It'll be a fun street runner. Dennis |
The Following User Says Thank You to SD455DJ For This Useful Post: | ||
#37
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks everyone for the replies. Pretty clear which way to go with this:
066, Summit 2800 or Bullet 207 cam 4bbl qjet Stock Iron intake Stock internals Stock exhaust manifolds 2.5 dual exhaust 3.08 rear posi 4spd 2.64 or higher first gear
__________________
************************************************** ******************* 73 TA 4 spd #'s match red/white - "STOLEN" AT TERRY SPEAR's SHOP IN Columbia TN ~mid 2014 Last offical pic of the car can been seen here: http://clubs.hemmings.com/pontiactn/...%20-%20rev.pdf People have seen it posted FS on Craigs List back in late 2013 early 2014.... ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ IF YOU HAVE ANY INFO ABOUT IT PLEASE CONTACT ME!!! |
#38
|
||||
|
||||
You also want to in the least since the car will likely be driven briskly install a factory style late model baffled oil pan and 3/4 or even better full length windage tray.
If not the tray then get a crank scraper. Also don’t forget a 60 psi oil pump and a HD driveshaft for that.
__________________
I do stuff for reasons. |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to 25stevem For This Useful Post: | ||
#39
|
||||
|
||||
WAY back in my High School days a local guy here had a GT-37. Not sure what year, 71 maybe? It was a really quick street car and he won a lot of street races with it. We always thought it was a 400 or 455 powered car till one night he opened the hood in the High School parking lot and low and behold it was a 350! It was backed by a 3 speed manual transmission and 3.55 gears nearly as I can remember.
Pretty impressive non-the-less, at least for the combination of parts.......
__________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a Veteran! https://cliffshighperformance.com/ 73 Ventura, SOLD 455, 3740lbs, 11.30's at 120mph, 1977 Pontiac Q-jet, HO intake, HEI, 10" converter, 3.42 gears, DOT's, 7.20's at 96mph and still WAY under the roll bar rule. Best ET to date 7.18 at 97MPH (1/8th mile), |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Back to the OP's question, since you are rebuilding the engine, now's a good time to upgrade the heads to #13's, 62's, or '68 #16's that would give you 9.+ compression. Cost the same as rebuilding the #11's and come with screw-in studs already...just a thought. Dennis |
The Following User Says Thank You to SD455DJ For This Useful Post: | ||
Reply |
|
|