Suspension TECH Including Brakes, Wheels and tires

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-26-2020, 01:43 PM
Wbyman22 Wbyman22 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 6
Default Eaton Springs for a 68 Firebird

Have a 68 Bird 400HO 4 Spd Coupe and would like to get rid of the air shocks currently on it.

Thinking about ordering a new set of Springs for it, with a 1” or 2” extra arch, the ones currently in car seem pretty weak/wore out and I like the rear sitting up a bit higher then stock, not way up, but some.

I’ve had guys tell me that the “400” model cars are supposed to have the 4 leaf springs instead of the 5, can anyone confirm that? I see Eaton offers a 90lb rate 5 Spring or a 119lb 4 leaf for 68 400 Coupe cars, just would like to get what’s supposed to be in there!

I have 60lbs of air in shocks currently and has car sitting like I want it to without the air shocks, about 16” from center of rear wheel to fender lip, any input/suggestions welcome and appreciated.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  #2  
Old 06-26-2020, 07:58 PM
Tim john Tim john is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,881
Default

Pretty car, great stance. Call Detroit Eaton and speak with them directly. They have always been very helpful when I called.

Tim john---

  #3  
Old 06-27-2020, 09:29 AM
Wbyman22 Wbyman22 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 6
Default

Thanks!!
I did call them and talked to them a bit, they couldn’t however confirm what models exactly got the 4 leaf Springs vs the 5 leaf Springs, was hoping to find out for sure. Would like to buy what belongs on car?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  #4  
Old 07-03-2020, 10:04 AM
Wbyman22 Wbyman22 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 6
Default

So I found some pictures scrolling through the Forums of how to measure the ride height specs to the rocker panel on a 68 Bird, but I’m seeing different numbers on different sites, anyone know which of these is correct?



Found these specs on the First Gen website but are quite different then the pic above, the pics above seem more realistic, the actual specs seem like that’s to low, unless it’s to a different point then pic above?



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:48 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017