Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-02-2020, 04:34 PM
NYGTO's Avatar
NYGTO NYGTO is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 531
Default AFB Jetting

I've been looking into the best fuel enrichment for the AFB used on early GTO's for street and strip.

I'm not sure what the typical jet change was from the popular speed shops and dealers like Royal for the AFB, naturally there's a lot more information on the tri-power cars

Can any of the veteran early GTO guys give me some direction on what worked on the strip? The stock jet was.091 and the metering rods were .0635 X .055.

The air is cold and dense now so I'm thinking a 100 jet with the stock metering rods would be a good place to start. The car is completely stock.

Thanks in advance for any ideas.

__________________
[
  #2  
Old 11-03-2020, 02:40 AM
Geoff Geoff is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,471
Default

That is for a 65 GTO, std trans.

Going from 91 to 100 on the pri jet is a HUGE increase, ridiculous.

Try a later AFB or Edel 092 jet.

  #3  
Old 11-03-2020, 12:15 PM
NYGTO's Avatar
NYGTO NYGTO is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 531
Thumbs up Jets

The idea of a .100 jetting was for the convenience of using the metering rods to fine tune from that size.

I can use a wider rod for leaning and work my way thinner for whatever the air density circumstances are.

I've only had experiences with Holley carbs with slightly modified open exhaust engines so my pure stock GTO has me guessing for a starting point.

Thank you for responding.

__________________
[
  #4  
Old 11-03-2020, 02:59 PM
tom s tom s is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 18,794
Default

Contact 61-63 on this site for jetting help with AFBs.Tom

  #5  
Old 11-04-2020, 10:01 AM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 20,577
Default

Hard to beat a wide band O2 sensor in the exhaust to tell for sure.

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
  #6  
Old 11-05-2020, 01:19 PM
61-63's Avatar
61-63 61-63 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Sour Lake, Texas
Posts: 2,394
Default

You sent me a pm and I responded but I'm wondering why you are asking if the car is completely stock, which suggests to me that it isn't a race car. If it isn't in fact a race car and it is running fine if it were me I'd just leave it alone. A stock '65 GTO 4 bbl car made 325hp which is a nice performing car. If you get an 02 sensor, some jets and metering rods, and fiddle with it you will be able to improve it some, but will the gain be worth the effort?

  #7  
Old 11-09-2020, 03:17 PM
NYGTO's Avatar
NYGTO NYGTO is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 531
Default

Yes, it's a completely stock car but in the spirt of fine tuning and enjoying the hobby of grass-roots hot rodding, I'd like to see how well I could make the GTO run. Just as several dealerships offered performance tune packages when these cars were new. I'm not looking to go beyond what the dealers did I appreciate your help.

__________________
[
  #8  
Old 11-09-2020, 03:30 PM
Dick Boneske's Avatar
Dick Boneske Dick Boneske is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Winneconne, Wisconsin
Posts: 5,388
Default

I raced my '64 GTO when it still had an AFB carb. I tried larger jets with no improvement in ET's. A few thousandths of an inch larger jets will help a minimal amount.

After trying various things with the stock AFB, I bought a bigger one. I gained about 0.15 seconds with that bigger carb. Swapping to a Tri-Power setup got me from the 13.60's to 13.29 @109.75 with a stock '64 GTO 389.

__________________
BONESTOCK GOATS

'64 GTO Tripower Hardtop (Wife's Car)
'64 GTO Tripower Post Coupe (My Car)
'99 Bonneville SE Sedan
  #9  
Old 11-09-2020, 03:48 PM
NYGTO's Avatar
NYGTO NYGTO is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 531
Default

Thanks D.B. --- that's flying for a stock GTO. I'll see what I can do next week at the track.

__________________
[
  #10  
Old 11-09-2020, 05:46 PM
Kenth's Avatar
Kenth Kenth is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Kingdom of Sweden
Posts: 5,476
Default

With todays ethanol blended fuels it wouldn´t hurt enlarge idle tubes, primary and secondary jets about 5 percent.

__________________
1966 GTO Tri-Power
1970 GTO TheJudge
http://www.poci.org/
http://gtoaa.org/
  #11  
Old 12-13-2020, 01:17 PM
NYGTO's Avatar
NYGTO NYGTO is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 531
Default

Update:

I used 98 jets with stock metering rods and as best I can tell gained a small increase in mile per hour at the track. I had planned several changes but the day was cut short by the weather. I'll try again this early spring. Thanks

__________________
[
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:29 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017