FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Downflow vs Crossflow radiators
Is there a difference in cooling ability? I have a 67 GTO and it came stock with a downflow but ive read crossflows are much more efficient. Is there any reason i shouldnt run a good aftermarket aluminum downflow? {alumitech or rodney red or PY}??
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
This is one of those pro-con sorta discussions that could go on for ever.
Ask me,I prefer the crossflows. The main reason is in most cases (like 95%) the crossflow radiator puts the radiator cap on the low pressure/cool/suction side of the system. That is the more ideal location for the cap than most downflows set-ups use,most downflows have the radiator cap on the high-pressure/hot side of the system. That typically means there is less of a chance of losing coolant with the crossflow rad. This is mostly due to the pressure drop as coolant moves thru the core. As a result the crossflow radiator can typically get away with using a lower cap pressure rating. That tends to be a bit easier on all the hoses & gaskets. It's also much better to have the cap on the suction side if one chooses to employ a coolant recovery set-up as well. There are some pretty good reasons the OEM's no longer use the downflow rads in these sorta applications. But I digress. Bret P. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
If you have a stock motor, then the stock radiator should be fine.
But if you've increased the power production, you need to increase the cooling capacity appropriately. My current project had a downflow radiator, and it worked great for the stock motor. But, the new motor has roughly 3x the hp of the original. I tried the stock radiator, and it just could not keep up. C&R racing built me a crossflow 2-pass, with a 3000cfm SPAL fan mounted in a custom low-profile sealed shroud. It is a rather small radiator, but has no problem keeping nearly 600hp cool. Lee
__________________
'73 T/A (clone). Low budget stock headed 8.3:1 455, 222/242 116lsa .443/.435 cam. FAST Sportsman EFI, 315rwhp/385rwtq on 87 octane. 13.12 @103.2, 1.91 60'. '67 Firebird [sold], ; 11.27 @ 119.61, 7.167 @ 96.07, with UD 280/280 (108LSA/ 109 ICL)solid cam. [1.537, 7.233 @93.61, 11.46 @ 115.4 w/ old UD 288/296 108 hydraulic cam] Feb '05 HPP, home-ported "16" D-ports, dished pistons (pump gas only), 3.42 gears, 275/60 DR's, 750DP, T2, full exhaust |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
re
At first i was going to get an electric fan setup, but after sorting through parts i found my stock shroud and clutch fan so im going to use those. I kind of want a bolt in unit for easy of install and use of the stock shroud and fan. Rodney Red seems to have a very nice unit that is 100% bolt in and a high quality product. The only down side would be that it is a down flow unit from the looks of it and they ARE NOT cheap. The engine will probably never go beyond 550 hp at any time in this car simply because i refuse to cage it or cut anything up. I would think the rodney red unit should be fine unless somone has a better suggestion??
Will the PY unit bolt directly in and use the stock shroud and fan? |
Reply |
|
|