FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Has anybody experimented and tried both ways?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Has anybody experimented and tried both ways?
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
My motor will flat not run without the PCV connected.
Building a fast stock appearing street car. homepage http://home.mchsi.com/~vroman6
__________________
best 1/4-11.37 @ 118.03, 96 heads on motor. 11.05 @ 120 on 100shot. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Come on guys. Nobody has experimented with these evac systems, using the pcv and not using the pcv?
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
I haven't gone this way yet but I have been doing some reading on the subject. Since you will be creating a vacumn in the engine crankcase with pump the pvc would never work as the check valve would always be pulled down because of the vacumn created by the evac pump. I read that you could have too much evac and start pulling oil away from the bearing so ???? makes a calibrated vent that is installed in the oil pan so when engine/crankcase vacumn hits a certain point it allows air into the crankcase prvent the oil starvation problem. I was searching for Stefs when I canme across the vent. alan
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Evac systems don't work well enough to pull the ball down, since they barely make any vacuum at all. You could probably get away with it, but it won't be nearly as effective as just doing it the right way.
Chance favors the prepared mind. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
PCV positive crankcase ventalation,,,PVC poly vynil chloride...can't spell viynil? I run just a MrG evac. system with no pcv valve and runs like a bat out of h_ll...
BIGGERISBETTER-15 yrs in NHRA tech ret. 1977 400 .030, RPM E-Take, Q-jet, 6X, 3650lb. 78 Catalina,14.50's.
__________________
NHRA tech. "Its just a 412, I swear it". Pontiac tip of the year, quit those damn cigarettes. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Vinyl.
Chance favors the prepared mind. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
OK, at least I got the first pcv right before it turned into pvc.
|
Reply |
|
|