FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
"pure unobtanium"
close... maybe semi-unobtanium? ;-) I will say it would the VERY LAST CAR I'd ever consider letting go of (imminent death perhaps?). I think the II is about 200lbs lighter than my 69 RA4 TA. No ps no pb bench seat no rallyees help add to the -75lb weight advantage it would have over a similarly equipped 69 Ra 4 Bird (using 68 vs 69 Firebird AMA specs)... With most/all 69 TAs having heavier rally IIs, the TA's mandatory PS, PB and added rear deckwing (not to mention beefier suspension) an additional 100lbs+ is lopped on relative to my stripper ram II. hence, the ~200lb differential...imo the 69 ra 4 ta would have a BIG uphill battle vs the ra II ... bottom line, even with a (hypothetical) lightweight 69 ra iv bird, it STILL would be very tough to beat a stripper II Bird. Last edited by ramair2; 01-30-2008 at 12:29 AM. |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Since it's a fact that a RA IV '70 1/2 Formula COULD have been ordered, then one WOULD be considered legal for PSD competition.
__________________
Regards, "455HO" Lloyd 2008 GMC Sierra Denali 2WD Crew, L92 6L80E, Silver w/ Ebony guts, 14.26 @ 98 |
Reply |
|
|