#1  
Old 08-03-2013, 02:03 PM
ClassicDriverMan's Avatar
ClassicDriverMan ClassicDriverMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 177
Default Later Pontiac motor in 55-57 Chassis

I know there is some threads on the board here about this, but much of the information is scattered about and hidden. I have a few questions about the install. I know some of the guys here have done it. I have been doing research on putting a later Pontiac motor (post 1959) into an earlier chassis (55-57 Pontiac). I know about fabricating side mounts and a later trans mount. Got that.

My questions are about installing an early timing cover on later motors and using the factory style front mount (chin mount).

Okay: Please let me know if I have this right:

1960 cover was the first year of "normal" cooling and earlier timing covers are for the "reverse flow" cooling. The 1960 timing cover is not aluminum and has the mounting surfaces necessary - I think.

Crank diameter is smaller on the 1960 cover (and earlier) and the best mod is to bore out the crank hole and install a newer seal as stated in this:

http://www.pontiacsafari.com/L1Garag...ealUpgrade.pdf

===== Questions: =====

1. I appears that later covers (later motors) have the same mounting surfaces to use a "chin mount". Are these covers not used because of the material used or in fact do these cover not have the mounting surfaces?

2. If using the 1960 cover on later motor, what must be done with some of the smaller water passages? I would seem there is holes that do not mate up.

3. Is there any block modifications that need to be done? Ie, drill/tap any holes in the block or cover?

4. What year gasket is recommended?

Thanks for reading and I hope to get some responses

PS: I am asking these same questions on other boards also just in case you read it there.....

__________________
Tribal Tube Header Rip Off Victim. Ordered March 27, 2012. Told 3-4 weeks. Still waiting
  #2  
Old 08-03-2013, 02:07 PM
ClassicDriverMan's Avatar
ClassicDriverMan ClassicDriverMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 177
Default

NOT MY CAR:

I found this picture on the internet....

This looks like using a later motor (cover) and simply bolting it to the cross member.

Is this wrong? Or at least bad?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	56 pont frame engine 401a.jpg
Views:	231
Size:	68.5 KB
ID:	331942  

__________________
Tribal Tube Header Rip Off Victim. Ordered March 27, 2012. Told 3-4 weeks. Still waiting

Last edited by ClassicDriverMan; 08-03-2013 at 02:08 PM. Reason: spelling
  #3  
Old 08-03-2013, 03:25 PM
Steve Barcak's Avatar
Steve Barcak Steve Barcak is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Pontiac Heaven in the Arizona desert & above the White mountains in the cool country of eastern Az
Posts: 4,581
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ClassicDriverMan View Post
I know there is some threads on the board here about this, but much of the information is scattered about and hidden. I have a few questions about the install. I know some of the guys here have done it. I have been doing research on putting a later Pontiac motor (post 1959) into an earlier chassis (55-57 Pontiac). I know about fabricating side mounts and a later trans mount. Got that.

My questions are about installing an early timing cover on later motors and using the factory style front mount (chin mount).

Okay: Please let me know if I have this right:

1960 cover was the first year of "normal" cooling and earlier timing covers are for the "reverse flow" cooling. The 1960 timing cover is not aluminum and has the mounting surfaces necessary - I think.

Crank diameter is smaller on the 1960 cover (and earlier) and the best mod is to bore out the crank hole and install a newer seal as stated in this:

http://www.pontiacsafari.com/L1Garag...ealUpgrade.pdf

===== Questions: =====

1. I appears that later covers (later motors) have the same mounting surfaces to use a "chin mount". Are these covers not used because of the material used or in fact do these cover not have the mounting surfaces?

2. If using the 1960 cover on later motor, what must be done with some of the smaller water passages? I would seem there is holes that do not mate up. Not sure there is a problem with that but. remember, things got 'better' as time went on and Pontiac designed better and more efficient water pumps and routing for the larger engines that came out. Not sure how well an early cover/pump would work on a later, larger engine. Of course the application is an important factor when asking questions and trying to provide answers. You have not shared your intentions with us.

3. Is there any block modifications that need to be done? Ie, drill/tap any holes in the block or cover? I take this question is specific to the timing cover mount? If so, the answer is no.

4. What year gasket is recommended? I would use the gasket for the year t cover. But, check both the block and the cover you use with the gasket to make sure it seals properly.

Thanks for reading and I hope to get some responses

you are welcome

PS: I am asking these same questions on other boards also just in case you read it there.....

. I appears that later covers (later motors) have the same mounting surfaces to use a "chin mount". Are these covers not used because of the material used or in fact do these cover not have the mounting surfaces? the alum covers that started to be used in '61 cannot be as strong as the earlier cast covers that were designed to hold the weight of the engine.

2. If using the 1960 cover on later motor, what must be done with some of the smaller water passages? I would seem there is holes that do not mate up. Not sure there is a problem with that but. remember, things got 'better' as time went on and Pontiac designed better and more efficient water pumps and routing for the larger engines that came out. Not sure how well an early cover/pump would work on a later, larger engine. Of course the application is an important factor when asking questions and trying to provide answers. You have not shared your intentions with us.

3. Is there any block modifications that need to be done? Ie, drill/tap any holes in the block or cover? I take this question is specific to the timing cover mount? If so, the answer is no.

4. What year gasket is recommended? I would use the gasket for the year t cover. But, check both the block and the cover you use with the gasket to make sure it seals properly.

Thanks for reading and I hope to get some responses

you are welcome



You mention using a 'post '59 block'. I think you mean t

o say 'post '58 block'?

'59s were the first year with side mounts.

Another very important factor you do not mention is your trans choice.
If , for example you plan to use your stock trans, then swapping in a '59 or '60 389 is quite simple and effective. '61 and later engines will require more work to fit primarily because of the bellhousing change. Again, without knowing your intentions and what you want to do for a trans, I can only half guess here.
One reason why the trans type is so important to know is the earlier trans mounted at the bell, the later trans mounted at the tail. If you use a later tail mounted trans with an earlier engine mounted t cover, You are putting a lot of stress on the assembly as nothing is supporting the eng/trans in the middle.

__________________
Hundreds of Pontiacs in Az
"Real Pontiacs only..no corporate nonsense!"
Facebook- Pontiac Heaven
Hosting-
23rd annual Pontiac Heaven weekend- Phoenix pending due to covid
Pontiac Heaven Museum in process
Phil 2:11
  #4  
Old 08-03-2013, 03:45 PM
ClassicDriverMan's Avatar
ClassicDriverMan ClassicDriverMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 177
Default

Okay, what I am trying to understand is:

If I wanted to use, say a 1969 400, bolt it into a 1957 chassis. What would be needed to do? I understand about fabricating side mounts and the rear trans mount if I wanted to go that route...

What if I were to use a 1960 timing cover? From what I have learned the 1960 is the first year of "normal" coolant flow and the last year of the iron cover that is strong enough for a "chin" mount. I have heard of others do this. I just don't have all the little details.

I get the rear (bell housing mount) thing. I have a TH400 and I have the capability to fabricate such a mount to make a "mid mount". I could also make up a crossmember to use the normal TH400 mount also. I would NOT just do the "chin mount" and the normal TH400 mount. I think that would be too far apart for the mounts.


__________________
Tribal Tube Header Rip Off Victim. Ordered March 27, 2012. Told 3-4 weeks. Still waiting
  #5  
Old 08-03-2013, 03:47 PM
ClassicDriverMan's Avatar
ClassicDriverMan ClassicDriverMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 177
Default

Oh, when I referred to the "post 59" block.... I was thinking in reference to the coolant flow and not the side mounts that appeared in 1959. I think I have that right:

1959 - First year of side mounts, last year of "gusher/reverse" coolant flow

1960 - First year of "normal" coolant flow. Has side mounts, but timing cover is strong enough and has mounting surfaces (I think, if different than later years) to use as "chin mount".

Do I have that right?


__________________
Tribal Tube Header Rip Off Victim. Ordered March 27, 2012. Told 3-4 weeks. Still waiting

Last edited by ClassicDriverMan; 08-03-2013 at 03:55 PM.
  #6  
Old 08-03-2013, 03:51 PM
ClassicDriverMan's Avatar
ClassicDriverMan ClassicDriverMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 177
Default

And... what about that mounting in the picture I found? That appears to be a late model motor using the timing cover as a mount. Is that smart considering I have read about the 1960 covering being the last one made of iron and having the strength to do that?

THE BELOW PICTURE IS NOT MY CAR
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	56 pont frame engine 401a.jpg
Views:	130
Size:	68.5 KB
ID:	331969  

__________________
Tribal Tube Header Rip Off Victim. Ordered March 27, 2012. Told 3-4 weeks. Still waiting

Last edited by ClassicDriverMan; 08-03-2013 at 04:04 PM.
  #7  
Old 08-03-2013, 05:33 PM
Bill Eveland's Avatar
Bill Eveland Bill Eveland is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Glasford Il
Posts: 3,650
Default

Thru a couple of my threads I've posted about using a 60 cover on a 66 389 and the flat area of the front of the block sealed up with just using the 60 gasket and no changes were needed to the block. There was a change not sure when about the front of the block not being flat all the way up to seal the unused holes. This hole on the cover was pretty rough and would need machined to be able to seal up with a freeze plug. I tried with just sealer on the freeze plug and it didn't hold.

What year block are you trying to use?

There are some pics of this on my Hurst mount thread .

__________________
Illinois Outlaw Gassers

6.27@107
9.97@131
  #8  
Old 08-03-2013, 07:11 PM
Steve Barcak's Avatar
Steve Barcak Steve Barcak is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Pontiac Heaven in the Arizona desert & above the White mountains in the cool country of eastern Az
Posts: 4,581
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ClassicDriverMan View Post
Oh, when I referred to the "post 59" block.... I was thinking in reference to the coolant flow and not the side mounts that appeared in 1959. I think I have that right:

1959 - First year of side mounts, last year of "gusher/reverse" coolant flow

1960 - First year of "normal" coolant flow. Has side mounts, but timing cover is strong enough and has mounting surfaces (I think, if different than later years) to use as "chin mount".

Do I have that right?

yes

__________________
Hundreds of Pontiacs in Az
"Real Pontiacs only..no corporate nonsense!"
Facebook- Pontiac Heaven
Hosting-
23rd annual Pontiac Heaven weekend- Phoenix pending due to covid
Pontiac Heaven Museum in process
Phil 2:11
  #9  
Old 08-03-2013, 07:21 PM
ClassicDriverMan's Avatar
ClassicDriverMan ClassicDriverMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 177
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Eveland View Post
Thru a couple of my threads I've posted about using a 60 cover on a 66 389 and the flat area of the front of the block sealed up with just using the 60 gasket and no changes were needed to the block. There was a change not sure when about the front of the block not being flat all the way up to seal the unused holes. This hole on the cover was pretty rough and would need machined to be able to seal up with a freeze plug. I tried with just sealer on the freeze plug and it didn't hold.

What year block are you trying to use?

There are some pics of this on my Hurst mount thread .
Thanks very much... that is the kind of information I need and looking for! I have read tons of your posts and threads. Your build is awesome. I have read your thread about the Hurst mount. I see you changed motors and then also got the Hurst mount for the later motors. Great stuff!

Any input from anyone is greatly appreciated.

I will be using a 1969 400. I wanted an idea before I tear the cover off to see what is needed and get a better idea what to expect.

Question: If Pontiac no longer used the "chin mount", why is it that the newer (1960 and up) still have the mounting holes in them? Or am I just not seeing it right?

Thanks

__________________
Tribal Tube Header Rip Off Victim. Ordered March 27, 2012. Told 3-4 weeks. Still waiting
  #10  
Old 08-03-2013, 07:25 PM
ClassicDriverMan's Avatar
ClassicDriverMan ClassicDriverMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 177
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Barcak View Post
yes
Thanks, just wanted to make sure.

__________________
Tribal Tube Header Rip Off Victim. Ordered March 27, 2012. Told 3-4 weeks. Still waiting
  #11  
Old 08-03-2013, 09:22 PM
Bill Eveland's Avatar
Bill Eveland Bill Eveland is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Glasford Il
Posts: 3,650
Default

One thing about using the front cover mount is it should have side mounts at the trans like the original setup.

The 60 cover lower holes for the bracket use 7/16" bolts, the later aluminum covers the holes are 5/16 . Can't really say why there still there , maybe something used at the factory for assembly? So whoever did that set up in your pic is relying on 5/16 bolts in aluminum to support the front of the engine, it might be ok but not something I would recommend.

__________________
Illinois Outlaw Gassers

6.27@107
9.97@131
  #12  
Old 08-03-2013, 09:45 PM
ClassicDriverMan's Avatar
ClassicDriverMan ClassicDriverMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 177
Default

Okay, thanks... good information.

With reference to the pictures... You have confirmed my thoughts on that install. I wasn't planning on that.

As far as actually using a 1960 timing cover on a later motor... it looks like the only concerns are the coolant bypass routing for quick warm up as you did on your early motor and machining/freeze plug the unused port in the back of the 1960 cover. Then it is the crank seal mod.

Is there issues with using a later vibration dampener with the older timing cover?

__________________
Tribal Tube Header Rip Off Victim. Ordered March 27, 2012. Told 3-4 weeks. Still waiting
  #13  
Old 08-03-2013, 09:54 PM
ClassicDriverMan's Avatar
ClassicDriverMan ClassicDriverMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 177
Default

Thanks Bill!

I really appreciate you knowledge.

THANKS for answering the same questions on both web boards!!

__________________
Tribal Tube Header Rip Off Victim. Ordered March 27, 2012. Told 3-4 weeks. Still waiting
  #14  
Old 08-03-2013, 11:15 PM
Bill Eveland's Avatar
Bill Eveland Bill Eveland is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Glasford Il
Posts: 3,650
Default

One main difference is the early cover only has a pointer on the cover, whereas the later have the numbers on the cover. I transferred the spacing and numbers onto the damper .

__________________
Illinois Outlaw Gassers

6.27@107
9.97@131
  #15  
Old 08-03-2013, 11:54 PM
ClassicDriverMan's Avatar
ClassicDriverMan ClassicDriverMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 177
Default

Thanks again for all the info!

__________________
Tribal Tube Header Rip Off Victim. Ordered March 27, 2012. Told 3-4 weeks. Still waiting
  #16  
Old 08-05-2013, 12:22 PM
wheelman's Avatar
wheelman wheelman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Frozen in Northern Illinois
Posts: 62
Default

I was going to ask some of the same for a 56 I'm contemplating buying and doing a
TH400 and later engine swap to.

  #17  
Old 08-17-2013, 07:45 PM
Pontirag Pontirag is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bisbee, AZ USA
Posts: 3,872
Default

If all of this gets too hairy, I have installed a v8 in a 55 and a 50 pontiac, It was fairly easy to make a set of side mounts, One thing I would recommend is to use a 70 and later block that has provisions for mounting later year firebird motot mounts, the fire bird mounts are further forward, Its not an issue on the passenger side but on the driver side the steering box is in the way so using the more forward mounts gives you a bit of wiggle room to weld up a frame mount in front of the steering box.

also use a long shaft th400, that way the tail shaft will extend through the X brace, if you use the short shaft u joints have very little clearance and the normal up and down motion of the drive shaft wil cause it to contact the x brace, cutting enough clearance for the drive shaft weakens the x brace to the point of it being useless,. better to use the long shaft that extends through the x brace and out the back.

  #18  
Old 02-01-2020, 06:53 PM
Zebulyn70 Zebulyn70 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 3
Default 56 Pontiac

Have you got any answers to your questions? I have a 56 that I’m building. Managed to find a bell housing on this blog so I can at least go to a Muncie or other trans for my 316. I talked to a guy in KS that said he uses the aluminum timing cover and front motor mount. With 600 hp engine. Not sure I believe that but I’m going to try it. If it works with the 316 I’m looking for a 389 and try that.

  #19  
Old 02-03-2020, 03:35 PM
Goatracer1 Goatracer1 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NH
Posts: 3,768
Default front cover lower holes

On the later engines with auto trans the factory bolted brackets to the lower holes in the timing cover for the trans fluid cooling tubes.

  #20  
Old 02-03-2020, 07:55 PM
694.1 694.1 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: SE WI
Posts: 1,366
Default

"On the later engines with auto trans the factory bolted brackets to the lower holes in the timing cover for the trans fluid cooling tubes."
Good info! I did not know.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	P1012049.jpg
Views:	138
Size:	57.6 KB
ID:	531051  

__________________
"At no time did we exceed 175 mph.”
Dan Gurney's truthful response to his and Brock Yate's winning of the first ever Cannonball Baker Sea-to-Shining Sea...

Still have my 1st Firebird
7th Firebird
57 Starchief
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:36 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017