FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#101
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I know of one '66 GTO that had a 421/338 h.p./2speed auto combo. The car was very low option and sold as a 335 h.p. 389 to a man in his 40's at Roughton Pontiac. Nobody would have ever known if it had not piggy backed a bearing under warrenty and the mechanic realized it when he pulled the engine apart. Nobody would likely have intentionally used the 338 h.p. motor. If they were going to the trouble why not a 376 hp 4 speed car? Obviously a mistake, somebody that got a 2+2 or some other full size and thought they had 421 probably had the GTO's 389 under the hood. I saw one of the 7 or 8 LS6 '71 Chevelles built(some say none were built), it was sold new at Colonial Chevrolet, a red bench seat, auto on the column, black interior car with cowl induction and the 425 h.p. decal on the open element air cleaner sitting on the Holley carb. My stepdad had a one off '65 Dodge pickup. It was a shortbed 2wd, dark blue and white. It had a 426 wedge, A-933 4 speed and a Dana 60 with 3.54 gears. It had a one off Hurst shifter built just for that truck, the truck was originally built for Cotten Owens to use as a pit crew truck/parts hauler for his Dodge NASCAR team and came from Dodge that way. Remember that in the days before the assembly line was fully automated, a lot of strange things could, and did get built. Some on purpose, some by accident. Also a lot of test mules ended up with COO's and titles, even though they were "checked off" as crushed.
__________________
Randy W 1975 Firebird third owner. 1980 Grand Am/black/beaurdeaux/45000 mile original owner.(Now belongs to Iowapub.) '67 Impala SS (sold) |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
73 455SD Grand Am
Any person who ever worked on a assembly line knows how goofed up things get. Wrong parts,bad parts,different parts, I got a 73 Le Mans one time that had a 350 emblem on the grill and a 400 engine under the hood! Seems they ran short on 350's and dropped in some 400's to keep thr line from going down.
But as far as the 73 455SD that was owned by Roach we may never learn what happened there. Who in there right mind would tell if they had it? |
#103
|
||||
|
||||
Fellow PY member Bill Morgan made a strange purchase within the last year...a '73 LeMans Sport Coupe sans the 1/4 louver windows (it has the large "collonade" windows that were on the base LeMans and the Luxury LeMans). The VIN checks out to be a legitimate Sport Coupe. Nearest I could figure is that Fisher Body ran out of the louvered window shells and had to ship the collonade window shells to finish that production run of Sport Coupes. Never saw one before or since. It would be worth saving just for posterity if no other reason, but the car is in rather rough shape. Bill posted pictures of it somehwhere on the board, probably the lobby.
__________________
Just a blind squirrel looking for a nut. |
#104
|
||||
|
||||
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...=471183&page=5
Here it is...more pictures on following pages. I also see pictures of my old '73 in Scott W's garage (the green pieces).
__________________
Just a blind squirrel looking for a nut. |
#105
|
||||
|
||||
Brian, there was a option code (WX8/422) in 1973, that shows up in factory documentation as "LeMans Sport Option-less Louvers." Factory production info shows 3,872 such cars were built that way. Sounds like Bill's car is one of them.
|
#106
|
||||
|
||||
Far as I know you could get either window. Some people didn't like the reduced visibility of the louvered windows, so I believe Pontiac let you substitute the big windows. PHS might clear it up.
__________________
http://www.pontiacpower.org/ |
#107
|
||||
|
||||
Was never aware of that, Rocky. PHS documents would be interesting, but Bill pulled the engine from that car and put it up for sale, don't know if he still has it or not. If I had more garage room, more money, and more time, I would have liked to bring it home, but the Can Am and funny car eat up all of that.
__________________
Just a blind squirrel looking for a nut. |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
Sooo..... I finally read through all the pages, hoping to see pictures or documentation of this 455SD Grand Am. I guess not.
There goes an hour of my time......
__________________
2001 Pontiac Trans Am WS6, 6-Speed, LS6 block, TEA LS6 heads, 4" SCAT forged crank, SCAT H-Beam rods, 226/234 cam, McLeod RST clutch, SLP Lid, SLP Power Flo Catback 1980 Pontiac Trans Am Y-84 Bandit WS6, 455 (.030 over), #96 Heads, Hedman headers, Wolverine 234/244 cam, Performer intake, Holley Sniper "Need a car to run blocker. Speedy car. Speedier than that....." |
#109
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Just a blind squirrel looking for a nut. |
#110
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
J/K
__________________
Randy W 1975 Firebird third owner. 1980 Grand Am/black/beaurdeaux/45000 mile original owner.(Now belongs to Iowapub.) '67 Impala SS (sold) |
#111
|
||||
|
||||
[QUOTE=Brian Baker]Were you speaking of Phil Griffith's Grand Am? There has been pictures of it posted here in the past, by myself and by Scott W. Do a search. As for documenting it, it's been said over and over that is was not factory built. It's an original 400 4-speed car however. If you were speaking of something else, never mind.[/QUOTE
Just in case anybody wants a look: http://www.grandamregistry.com/new/sdga.cfm
__________________
1973 SD455 Formula (Cameo) 1974 SD455 T/A (Bucaneer) 1973 SD455 T/A (Brewster) UK's only RAV motor.... 2006 Jeep GC SRT8 |
#112
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#113
|
||||
|
||||
Dave Bethauser from Witchita bought a new 73 gto with no louvers. You could delete them.
|
#114
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Randy W 1975 Firebird third owner. 1980 Grand Am/black/beaurdeaux/45000 mile original owner.(Now belongs to Iowapub.) '67 Impala SS (sold) Last edited by RandyW; 11-01-2007 at 07:55 PM. |
#115
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Just a blind squirrel looking for a nut. |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Actually, I did read through most all of it. Interesting for sure. It would have been nice if there really was a documented SD Grand Am. I remember reading about some of the factory 4-door Hemi cars and Hemi wagons Chrysler made in the mid-sixties. Pretty cool. Too bad you can't get stuff "special" today. I really hoped that there would have been a few factory LS6 Trans Ams and Camaros in 2002.
__________________
2001 Pontiac Trans Am WS6, 6-Speed, LS6 block, TEA LS6 heads, 4" SCAT forged crank, SCAT H-Beam rods, 226/234 cam, McLeod RST clutch, SLP Lid, SLP Power Flo Catback 1980 Pontiac Trans Am Y-84 Bandit WS6, 455 (.030 over), #96 Heads, Hedman headers, Wolverine 234/244 cam, Performer intake, Holley Sniper "Need a car to run blocker. Speedy car. Speedier than that....." |
#117
|
||||
|
||||
an almost definitive answer
There was a Grand Am SD with TA suspension and TA Steering Gear made as a probable press car at 895 Joslyn AKA Pontiac Engineering Bldg and now AKA Powertrain Engineering (one of several). I remember seeing it several times in the tunnel that lead through the Eng Bldg. Sadly it lived its last months or years in that tunnel because of its other feature: The Sun Roof Which had been blown out of the track early in its life and was never fixed.
So, there sat a fabulous car with a hole in the roof. There was a placard somewhere on the dashboard that enumerated the features and accessories of the car. BUT here is my question: when is a car official? 1. If it is put together at the engineering building? 2. If it is built on the pilot line? 3. If it is built at an assembly plant at normal speed? I vote against #1 because it is not necessarily made to any official specs other than "Do these parts fit together?" Yet I think the GA SD was probably put together at 895 Joslyn by the "Experimental Garage" mechanics I never saw any other GA SD's but I did see the final report on the roof... Blamed it on an assembler at Fisher Body. Anyway despite the Urban Legend spell on strange cars at Pontiac, I actually saw this car on a daily basis for almost a year. KTF citydesk175 |
#118
|
|||
|
|||
cool first-hand info!
I have been keeping up with this thread, but can;t rememeber if anyone has brought up the Grand Am station wagon built by Engineering fo then manager Tom Goad? And how they converted it back to Lemans specs before Tom purchased it and put it all back together. Does this count as a Grand Am wagon 1-of-1? Or is it just a cool Lemans? I agree with KTF scenario #1. Pontiac built it, just because it was never offered to the public doesn;t mean it's not real!
__________________
Jeff Ianitello |
#119
|
||||
|
||||
scnario number 1?
Thanks for the comment and interest
I rembember a mechanic at 895 bragging that his really important job was to create next years model out of this years model. An official real current car was placed in his workspace along with racks full of next years parts. CHALLENGE: Remove the obsolete parts, keep the carryover parts and somehow make the "future" parts fit. When by a miracle, the NEW car works and looks like it can be manufactured, maintained and repaired, explain to all the engineers and draftsmen who visit to find out how you managed to make it all fit and work.... Because it might not have been all that obvious on the drafting board. Some of this fitting and engineering process may be obvious in retrospect but some is not and I don't know if it is done this way anymore. The next time you wonder what genius caused all the chaos inside your car, blame it on a mechanic at 895 Joslyn in Pontiac MI. So, I think the GA SD in question started life as a real car and someone wrote an engineering work order to change it. BTW KTF = "Keep the Faith" citydesk175 |
#120
|
|||
|
|||
73 455SD Grand Am
I'd like to buy in to the idea of the SD as a created idea in the lab project.But,if it was just a dream,how did an actual list of parts along with part numbers,diagrams of these parts,descriptions, and a inventory of parts that were tossed in the trash?
I feel it had to be more than just a simple mock-up idea. You have to admit that if a guy in Wisconsin could manage to collect a group of original manufactured parts with part nos. on them they had to go further into this idea than just a idea? |
Reply |
|
|