FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
LS engines supposedly need a higher by-pass pressure rating - 22 PSI vs most all other filters rated lower.
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Most pontiac V8s have an upright filter above the pickup or main bearings, not sure if any little bit of oil above the filter that can potentially drain back would have any negative effects... if it did the filter would most likely have one. |
#44
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think I might’ve asked these questions years ago but don’t remember if they ever got an answer. The Baldwin B39 filter I believe does not have an anti-drain back valve? I don’t believe this is a problem on Pontiacs with the oil filters that hang down? And is there a problem using the B39 filter along with the factory bypass valve??
__________________
'71 GTO, 406 CID, 60916, 1.65 HS, '69 #46 Heads 230CFM, 800CFM Q-jet, TH400, 12 Bolt 3.55 '72 Lemans, Lucerne Blue, WU2, T41, L78, M22, G80 |
The Following User Says Thank You to Holeshot71 For This Useful Post: | ||
#45
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Both B39 and B9 has a anti drain-back valve.
https://www.rockauto.com/en/moreinfo...t=5340&jsn=323 https://www.rockauto.com/en/moreinfo...t=5340&jsn=338 No problems w or w/o anti drain-back valve on Pontiac V8´s w factory bypass valve. Also, WIX 51258 has an anti drain-back valve while the larger WIX51049 don´t. https://www.rockauto.com/en/moreinfo...t=5340&jsn=349 https://www.rockauto.com/en/moreinfo...t=5340&jsn=344 FWIW |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I purchased 4 cases of WIX 51049 filters years ago. Been using these filters on multiple cars and they have no anti- drain back valve. Pontiac filters are for the most part upright and the filter will always be full of oil.
|
#47
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
This is True, the oil filter will always be full of oil, but like someone mentioned, I think it was Steve, oil will drain back out of the galleys back to oil filter then into oil pan.
__________________
68 Firebird. IA2 block, 505 cu in, SD Performance E-head, Solid roller 3600 weight. Reid TH400 4:11 gear. 29" slick. Best so far 9.95@134 mph. 1.43 60 ft. 76 Trans am, TKX .81 o/d, 3.73 Moser rearend, 468 with KRE D-ports, Doug headers, 3" Exh. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just asking as I dont know all the specifics on oil filter function... but isnt the ADBV to prevent oil in the filter from draining back? Like in situations where its not upright? Or is it designed to prevent oil in the engine from draining back into the filter... which doesnt make much sense on a pontiac since the filter is upright & stays full.
|
#49
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Oil in the filter will not drain back so to speak, as the filter is lower than the hole going into the block from the pump. It's the oil in the engine ahead of the filter that will drain back slowly draining through the oil filter back into the oil pan. The oil filter anti drain back valve will or should hold the oil up in the engine to help prevent those few seconds of dry starts.
__________________
68 Firebird. IA2 block, 505 cu in, SD Performance E-head, Solid roller 3600 weight. Reid TH400 4:11 gear. 29" slick. Best so far 9.95@134 mph. 1.43 60 ft. 76 Trans am, TKX .81 o/d, 3.73 Moser rearend, 468 with KRE D-ports, Doug headers, 3" Exh. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() The ADBV in that situation is to keep the filter itself full of oil when it would want to flow out the top back into the engine, not keeping a very small amount of oil in the engine to drain back down into the filter. Doesnt the ADBV only work one way, to keep oil IN the filter? Never thought about it much since Ive never had a problem with any type of filters on my pontiac cars. |
#51
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That new Champion filter design does look impressive.
I can’t think of any time having an anti drain back valve would be a bad thing unless it negatively affects the flow rating. On an old Pontiac I can’t picture it making much difference either way. The small filter I use with Pontiac’s with header clearance issues does not have a drain back valve. The use filter drain back valves is kind of all over the place for OEM applications. The newer Mopar 3.8 V6 corporate engine has a canister style filter upside down up on top of engine. When you change the oil there is never oil in it, it is stupid easy to change and doesn’t leave a mess like a spin on. I know someone sells kits to add a drain back valve, which I have always thought would be a good idea. But my 14 Ram with that engine has with over 200K miles on it now, the drain back must not make a lot of difference. I can think of a few even more extreme examples that have no drain back provisions, take a terrible amount of time to build oil pressure, and seem to run forever. Some engines have to have drain back valves, like some Diesel engine that uses oil pressure for other functions in the injection system. Turbocharged engines are sensitive to dry starts too. |
#52
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The other day I went to Napa to get a filter. They asked which one I wanted, the Silver or the Gold. I asked what the difference was and they said the Silver was rated for 5000 miles max, the Gold was rated for 10,000. Both made by Wix. Things that make you go hmmmmm.
Btw, the Chrysler engine with the crazy filter design on top of the engine that has no drain back feature is a 3.6, not a 3.8. |
#53
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
'71 GTO, 406 CID, 60916, 1.65 HS, '69 #46 Heads 230CFM, 800CFM Q-jet, TH400, 12 Bolt 3.55 '72 Lemans, Lucerne Blue, WU2, T41, L78, M22, G80 |
#54
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I had found through OA's that I had stretched to 6000 miles and things were still looking good, the filter was still doing a good job. I didn't stretch it further though and just kind of picked 6000 miles as a good spot to change oil in the cars. Could probably go further but I was happy with that, basically saving me double the cost I was spending changing oil in the cars at 3000 miles. I found out that was completely premature. I need to revisit that again at some point, not just to see if I can go further, but also to just get an update on filter quality and oil quality to make sure nothing has changed. |
#55
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Basically when sitting gravity will pull oil back down from the gallies into the filter. The thought is that gravity will force the oil over time, through the filter and back into the pan without a drain back valve, basically creating a dry start again. The anti drain back valve theoretically stops this from happening. The anti drain back valve wont let the oil escape therefore keeping more oil up in the engine, at least that's the thought process behind it anyway. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Formulajones For This Useful Post: | ||
#56
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks, and like mentioned about filters on top side of engines. I've changed oil in a Mercedes and a Porsche engine with the filter on top and it is just a cartridge filter. No check valves anywhere that I see. Engines start up fine after an oil change.
I had my diesel truck at the dealer for an oil change where they don't fill the oil filter, and upon starting it up you can hear what I believe is the lifters pumping back up. It only last like 2 seconds. I guess the moral of the story in all this as we all know, the sooner oil is everywhere in your engine the better. FWIW.
__________________
68 Firebird. IA2 block, 505 cu in, SD Performance E-head, Solid roller 3600 weight. Reid TH400 4:11 gear. 29" slick. Best so far 9.95@134 mph. 1.43 60 ft. 76 Trans am, TKX .81 o/d, 3.73 Moser rearend, 468 with KRE D-ports, Doug headers, 3" Exh. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
It is essentially a one-way valve on the filter inlet. Oil can be pushed past that valve to enter the filter, but (if it's working properly) oil cannot EXIT the filter ENTRY. |
#58
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Another thing to consider is in a situation where the oil can drain back from the filter the drain back valve may keep contaminants in the filter from going back into the engine.
__________________
'71 GTO, 406 CID, 60916, 1.65 HS, '69 #46 Heads 230CFM, 800CFM Q-jet, TH400, 12 Bolt 3.55 '72 Lemans, Lucerne Blue, WU2, T41, L78, M22, G80 |
The Following User Says Thank You to Holeshot71 For This Useful Post: | ||
#59
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
If someone has a small space saver Champion that works with Pontiac’s on header applications, I’d be interested in trying one of them. I noticed the Wix number I use for headers doesn’t cross to Champion. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
What was strange is that the full size stp/champ that crosses to the other full size filters did not fit between a header tube & side of bell housing, but all other full size filters Ive tried fit ok, for some reason the full size STP is slightly bigger than most other full size filters and would not fit. Edit- Heres the thread with the smaller STP/champion filter I used... you commented in there a few times. STP S3675xl https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...d.php?t=877002 Last edited by 78w72; 01-12-2025 at 11:52 AM. |
The Following User Says Thank You to 78w72 For This Useful Post: | ||
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|