FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#141
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
First thing to recheck will be the open pressure, then I'm going to re-adjust (if possible) the pushrod guide plates to get the closed end of the opening as far from the pushrod as possible. After removing all the pushrods, 3 balls had fallen out and almost all showed visible signs of the balls being crammed down ointo the shafts. This has been the same on all 3 sets of stock pushrods (again, 11/32, 9.2" which came stock on the RAIV). All are breaking at the rocker end. If it was too much spring pressure then at least one of these 48 rods would show damage at the lifter end, right? To my thinking, something is happening between the guide plate and the rocker arm pushrod seat. Could the geometry be off and the rockers torqueing the top of the pushrods against the guides at full lift? Remember, this motor has not seen 2000 RPM and these pushrods are disintegrating after 15 moinutes of break in. I'm also going to remove the plugs and slowly turn the motor by hand and carefully watch pushrod and rocker travel. I will probably just go back to a stamped steel 1.65 rocker, since the only thing unchanged through three broken pushrod cycles are the rockers. I've ordered chromoly pushrods but I'm afraid the cam will get wiped if the original pushrod material is not the problem. |
#142
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
As previously stated, that machine shop closed its doors 10+ years ago and the owners/machinists (I knew them personally - good guys) are all deceased. In their defense they machined 5 other engines for me over the years (and assembled the heads) without problems. And yeah, it sucks. I had planned on selling this car at Mecum Kissimmee in January and I was right on track until this happened. Oh well, we press on. |
#143
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
These Comp Cam roller tip rockers have a longer slot than the stock stamped steel units but that would make great sense in explaining the pushrod failure. Maybe full rollers are in my near future.
|
#144
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Jimbobeast For This Useful Post: | ||
#145
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Chuck the RA4 guide plates take bigger 11/32" push Rods so he would have to swap out the guide plates also.
__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs! And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs! 1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set. Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks. 1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes. Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph. Education is what your left with once you forget things! |
The Following User Says Thank You to steve25 For This Useful Post: | ||
#146
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I certainly feel for you man! Dennis |
#147
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The O/P could take one of those 11/32" push rods to a machine shop and have them tested to see how much pressure/force it takes to push the ball into the push-rod. That would defiantly something I would want to know. Now, that you know your open and closed spring pressures, you can kinda work backwards to see what is binding. Hell, he can run the engine with just the outer springs installed to break in the cam. Great time to make sure there is no coil bind on springs. Can you put a feeler gauge in between the springs coils at full lift?
__________________
68 Firebird. IA2 block, 505 cu in, SD Performance E-head, Solid roller 3600 weight. Reid TH400 4:11 gear. 29" slick. Best so far 9.95@134 mph. 1.43 60 ft. 76 Trans am, TKX .81 o/d, 3.73 Moser rearend, 468 with KRE D-ports, Doug headers, 3" Exh. |
#148
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ditch the ball tipped PRs and get one piece.
__________________
1967 Firechicken, 499", Edl heads, 262/266@0.050" duration and 0.627"/0.643 lift SR cam, 3.90 gear, 28" tire, 3550#. 10.01@134.3 mph with a 1.45 60'. Still WAY under the rollbar rule. |
#149
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#150
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#151
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
In any case, I did not order these Comp Cam rockers. Maybe they are not correct for a pontiac? I am just eliminating all variables. |
#152
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
So what are you saying here?
You today ordered from Butler Pontiac style stock steel 1.65 rockers?
__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs! And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs! 1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set. Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks. 1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes. Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph. Education is what your left with once you forget things! |
#153
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yup.
|
#154
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK, I'm cautiously optimistic that I may have found the source of the problem. As stated above, the only constant feature through 3 sets of pushrods was the rocker arms. They are indeed Comp Cam roller tip 1.65 ratio, but they were supplied by the already suspect defunct machine shop. In comparing the Comp cam units to stock stamped steel OEM rockers, the pushrod makes contact with the body of the rocker at minimal movement (see photos). The cup for the pushrod ball is also way deeper and would hold the pushrod tighter causing the rocker end of the pushrod to break. Maybe these are not even Pontiac rockers? There are definite witness marks on every one of the rocker bodies where the pushrod would make contact through the valvetrain rotation. I just was not looking in that spot before. Whaddya think?
In photo 1 the OEM unit is on the left, showing the range of motion (rocking) before the pushrod contacts the body of the rocker. Photos 2 and 3 further demonstrate my point, #2 is the OEM unit. See how far it can rock before contact occurs? Photo 4 shows the witness marks from the pushrods. Photo 5 shows the depth of the pushrod "cup" but more importantly shows how close the rocker body comes to the pushrod cup (left) compared to the OEM stamped steel unit. |
#155
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You found your problem!
I am surprised you did not have many more push rods break! Here’s the difference in the factory rockers between 1.5 and 1.65. Also they might be 1.6 small block Ford rockers, and not Pontiac. If they are not Ford rockers then they are made for 5/16” push rods and as you found out they can not be used with a true RA4 valvetrain and it’s 11/32” push rods.
__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs! And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs! 1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set. Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks. 1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes. Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph. Education is what your left with once you forget things! Last edited by steve25; 02-21-2025 at 08:16 PM. |
#156
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So the difference in 1.5 and 1.65 rockers was to move the pushrod contact point closer to the pivot (center)?
These comp cam units are stamped 1.65 |
#157
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yes, the higher the ratio the closer the push rod socket will be to the ball.
So they say 1.65 they are Pontiac then and simply .will not accept 11/32” push rods.
__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs! And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs! 1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set. Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks. 1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes. Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph. Education is what your left with once you forget things! |
#158
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Yes. ![]()
__________________
John Wallace - johnta1 Pontiac Power RULES !!! www.wallaceracing.com Winner of Top Class at Pontiac Nationals, 2004 Cordova Winner of Quick 16 At Ames 2004 Pontiac Tripower Nats KRE's MR-1 - 1st 5 second Pontiac block ever! "Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts." "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid." – Socrates |
#159
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Clearly NOT Pontiac 1.65 roller tip rockers.
|
#160
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I threw away the roller tip rockers and balls, got some simple Pontiac stamped steel 1.65 rockers and balls, another (the 4th) set of 11/32 pushrods and carefully assembled everything. No clearance issues. She started up and I ran her at 2000 RPM for 20 min (with fresh oil and ZDDP additive). Hmmm, running smoothly, no leaks, no smoke, no bad noises. I removed the valve covers and checked everything visually - "Look, Ma, no broken pushrods!" (see photo 1 and 2). The valvetrain looks happy all coated with glistening honey-colored oil. All is right in the world again. I consider this a great victory. The rest of the 1970 bits and bobs were added back on (hopefully for the last time). I have to admit I'm quite pleased with myself. It has been too long of a journey. Anyway, I'm putting the wrenches aside for a week and heading to my little cabin in the NW Georgia smokey mountains. Golf, fishing and relaxing. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Jimbobeast For This Useful Post: | ||
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|