Suspension TECH Including Brakes, Wheels and tires

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-16-2020, 12:46 PM
leeklm's Avatar
leeklm leeklm is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Mpls, MN
Posts: 1,747
Default FYI on rear disc brake line sizing

During my 68 strret/strip build, I researched line sizing and other various suggestions when installing rear disc brakes. I ended up going with the Ford Explorer calipers on my new 9".

I read several articles suggesting that disc calipers could use smaller brake line than drums, and many were installing 3/16 line all the way around. Since I had an entire roll of 3/16, that is what i used. From the start, braking on the car was ok, but not great. I bought a guage to test line pressures, which were on the low side of spec on the front. I did not have the proper line adapter to test the rear, but could tell it needed more rear brake.

Figured it would not hurt to save a few pounds so I talked to Wilwood and bought their recommended MC, and connected to a generic 4 wheel disc distribution block . Front line pressure was a little better with the wilwood, but no seat of the pants difference. Next step was to remove the block, connecting brake lines directly to the MC. Maybe a little better, but minimal.

This past wknd I replaced the 3/16 rear line with 1/4" from the MC to the T, leaving 3/16 to each wheel. Immediate improvement!! Braking is great, and can really feel the rear brakes doing something. I have 275/15 Nitto street tires and use a 10" racing slick, so always figured I could use more rear braking. If I was using a skinny rear street tire, I think I would now have to install an adjustable bias valve to slow the rear brakes down.

Anyway, I guess the lesson is to not assume rear discs can always use a smaller brake line!!!

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

__________________
68 Firebird-- Street/Strip - 400/461 Eagle Forged Bottom End & Ross Flat top pistons. KRE 325 CFM D port, Ultradyne 263/271 @.050, .4267 lift. Crower Solid roller lifters and 1.65 stainless rockers. Quickfuel 1000 on Torker2 intake and 2" open spacer. Hedman 1.75" headers. TH400 w/brake. Ford 9" w/3.80 gears & 28x9 Hoosier pro bracket drag radial. Best ET: 1.35 60ft, 6.29 @ 107.20 mph, 9.99 @132.33 mph. 3,300 race weight
  #2  
Old 06-16-2020, 01:54 PM
ZeGermanHam's Avatar
ZeGermanHam ZeGermanHam is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,927
Default

Yep, the 1/4" line that runs from front to rear should be retained. It's my understanding (and I'm no expert) that disc brakes require more volume at the same PSI than drums.

__________________

1966 Pontiac GTO (restoration thread)
1998 BMW 328is (track rat)
2023 Subaru Crosstrek Limited (daily)
View my photos: Caught in the Wild
  #3  
Old 06-17-2020, 04:57 AM
Geoff Geoff is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,471
Default

Discs require more pressure than drums, all else being equal. Considerably more pressure. A disc brake caliper is essentially a G clamp.
The drum brakes used on our Pontiacs are a duo-servo type where the brake shoes tend to get 'locked up' by the rotating drum, which assists in the braking action. Self assistance. Discs do not have this feature & relay on more line pressure.

  #4  
Old 06-17-2020, 07:34 AM
HWYSTR455's Avatar
HWYSTR455 HWYSTR455 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 14,721
Default

Yeah, discovered this years ago, but this is something that needs to be repeated over time.

Volume is just as important as psi, and is controlled by caliper volumes, line sizes/volume (and length), and master cyl bore size. There's actually a formula for calculating it.

Secondary variables are, as examples, restrictions, pad take-up, and fluid (moisture, type, etc).

Following an OE type system is a 'safe' approach, any variation should be thought-through for potential impacts. I generally recommend line kits that are 'conversion' sets, based off the original design. A front to rear line generally is in the $65 range, and worth saving the time & headaches.

You can vary master cyl bore size to target a certain feel or modulation, but it's more used for 'fine tuning' than correcting any other factors. It is possible to end up 'outside the box' and not have properly functioning brakes.

.

__________________
.

1970 GTO Judge Tribute Pro-Tour Project 535 IA2
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=760624
1971 Trans Am 463, 315cfm E-head Sniper XFlow EFI, TKO600 extreme, 9", GW suspension, Baer brakes, pro tour car
https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...ght=procharger
Theme Song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zKAS...ature=youtu.be
  #5  
Old 07-06-2020, 11:56 PM
punkin punkin is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Northern Colorado
Posts: 295
Default

Which bore diameter MC did you get? Are you using power assist?

Thanks for sharing this information. This is good stuff.

__________________
1968 Firebird
IAIIa 522
340 E-heads
Northwind with XFlow TBI
4L80E
3.50:1 Rear
  #6  
Old 07-07-2020, 09:08 AM
leeklm's Avatar
leeklm leeklm is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Mpls, MN
Posts: 1,747
Default

Here is the part... no power assist

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

__________________
68 Firebird-- Street/Strip - 400/461 Eagle Forged Bottom End & Ross Flat top pistons. KRE 325 CFM D port, Ultradyne 263/271 @.050, .4267 lift. Crower Solid roller lifters and 1.65 stainless rockers. Quickfuel 1000 on Torker2 intake and 2" open spacer. Hedman 1.75" headers. TH400 w/brake. Ford 9" w/3.80 gears & 28x9 Hoosier pro bracket drag radial. Best ET: 1.35 60ft, 6.29 @ 107.20 mph, 9.99 @132.33 mph. 3,300 race weight
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:10 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017