Suspension TECH Including Brakes, Wheels and tires

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-08-2002, 09:03 PM
Bungee Bungee is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Diego, Californy
Posts: 322
Default

For years, I've experienced wheel hop with my '78 T/A, and just assumed it was something I'd have to live with...I don't know much about performance cars [img]redface.gif[/img] .

But now that I'm doing research for my current 455 build, I'm realizing that the wheel hop may be the result of rear air shocks lifting the ass-end so high off the 275/60/15's . . . as I understand it, raising the rear end changes the suspension geometry in a negative way.

But I still want to retain my airshocks and keep the rear end raised high.

So I'm thinking of installing a set of Competition Engineering traction bars (I would have opted for Lakewood's, but they require you cut 1/2" off the sway bar ends). Are traction bars a good idea? Or am I using the wrong solution for this problem? . . . and are Competition Engineering traction bars a good product.

Thanks

  #2  
Old 09-08-2002, 09:03 PM
Bungee Bungee is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Diego, Californy
Posts: 322
Default

For years, I've experienced wheel hop with my '78 T/A, and just assumed it was something I'd have to live with...I don't know much about performance cars [img]redface.gif[/img] .

But now that I'm doing research for my current 455 build, I'm realizing that the wheel hop may be the result of rear air shocks lifting the ass-end so high off the 275/60/15's . . . as I understand it, raising the rear end changes the suspension geometry in a negative way.

But I still want to retain my airshocks and keep the rear end raised high.

So I'm thinking of installing a set of Competition Engineering traction bars (I would have opted for Lakewood's, but they require you cut 1/2" off the sway bar ends). Are traction bars a good idea? Or am I using the wrong solution for this problem? . . . and are Competition Engineering traction bars a good product.

Thanks

  #3  
Old 09-09-2002, 04:59 PM
Wayne79T/A's Avatar
Wayne79T/A Wayne79T/A is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Victoria,Tx
Posts: 77
Default

I am no expert on suspension,,,,,,but,
I had a 79 T/A with a medium performance 403.
All it would do is spin the tires with air shocks
and traction bars.
I put stock shocks on it,removed the traction bars,put 255 60/15 tires on the back and all it
did was hook up after that.

My .02

__________________
1979 T/A, 4 speed, 4 wheel disc,455 HO.
  #4  
Old 09-09-2002, 07:07 PM
ta406pont ta406pont is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 319
Default

If your really lookin for a great traction product buy a set of CalTracs the are the cat's a$$,a little exspensive but they are worth it.

Here's a Link
http://www.calvertracing.com/

Hope this helps
Rob..

  #5  
Old 09-09-2002, 09:04 PM
Bungee Bungee is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Diego, Californy
Posts: 322
Default

I checked out Cal Tracs and sent them a request for info.

Thanks for the tip

  #6  
Old 09-09-2002, 10:03 PM
Wayne79T/A's Avatar
Wayne79T/A Wayne79T/A is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Victoria,Tx
Posts: 77
Default

My circle trac buddy-guru said it had someting to do with rear axle wrap up?

__________________
1979 T/A, 4 speed, 4 wheel disc,455 HO.
  #7  
Old 09-11-2002, 11:46 AM
Half-Inch Stud's Avatar
Half-Inch Stud Half-Inch Stud is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: BlueBell, PA or AL U.S.A.
Posts: 18,476
Default

Traction Slap bars are a great item.

That's all I got back there to achieve 1.60 second 60'times...and avoid leafspring wrap.

Cal-Tracs look good, look smart...my J-Bolt Slapper bars were $40 though.

H.I. Stud

__________________
12.24/111.6MPH/1.76 60'/28"/3.54:1/SP-TH400/469 R96A/236-244-112LC/1050&TorkerI//3850Lbs//15MPG/89oct

Sold 2003: 12.00/112MPH/1.61 60'/26"x3.31:1/10"/469 #48/245-255-110LSA/Q-Jet-Torker/3650Lbs//18MPG 94oct
Sold 1994: 11.00/123MPH/1.50 60'/29.5"x4.10:1/10"/469 #48/245-255-110LSA/Dual600s-Wenzler/3250Lbs//94oct
  #8  
Old 09-11-2002, 01:54 PM
455HOGT37's Avatar
455HOGT37 455HOGT37 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Mojave Desert
Posts: 824
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Bungee:


But I still want to retain my airshocks and keep the rear end raised high.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Throw the airshocks away! When I was young I used airshocks on my 68 GTO to clear the N-50 Pro-Tracs. I was so proud my new 455 would blow them away until I put normal size tires under it with gas shocks and it suddenly hooked! Lesson learned: The air shocks are hurting you much more than the big tires are helping. Do a search and see how many of the experienced/fast guys have air shocks on their cars. Airshocks are pure evil, I tell you!

  #9  
Old 09-12-2002, 06:49 PM
Brian Baker's Avatar
Brian Baker Brian Baker is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Glen Burnie, MD USA
Posts: 17,184
Default

As Homer would say to Flanders, air shocks suck-diddley-uck. They don't allow the suspension to work, which "amplifies" the wheel hop issues.

For street driving, replace them with a good gas shock. For traction bars, a simple slapper bar will get the job done, but if you want to get serious the Cal-Tracs are what you want. The Cal-tracs will require you to remove the springs to install new bushings in the front eye (solid aluminum, supplied by Calvert Racing) as well as the front pivot brackets. Wouldn't be a bad idea to replace the rear eye bushings at the same time.

__________________
Just a blind squirrel looking for a nut.
  #10  
Old 09-13-2002, 08:43 AM
Half-Inch Stud's Avatar
Half-Inch Stud Half-Inch Stud is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: BlueBell, PA or AL U.S.A.
Posts: 18,476
Default

I haven't got serious...yet the 1.6 60foot times are decent for rubber-bushed, 5-leaf with J-Bolt Slappers, 3.31 geared, 26"tiny tired steel car.

...must be the Q-Jet

__________________
12.24/111.6MPH/1.76 60'/28"/3.54:1/SP-TH400/469 R96A/236-244-112LC/1050&TorkerI//3850Lbs//15MPG/89oct

Sold 2003: 12.00/112MPH/1.61 60'/26"x3.31:1/10"/469 #48/245-255-110LSA/Q-Jet-Torker/3650Lbs//18MPG 94oct
Sold 1994: 11.00/123MPH/1.50 60'/29.5"x4.10:1/10"/469 #48/245-255-110LSA/Dual600s-Wenzler/3250Lbs//94oct
  #11  
Old 09-15-2002, 10:50 AM
455HOGT37's Avatar
455HOGT37 455HOGT37 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Mojave Desert
Posts: 824
Default

One other trick that worked for me is to get another set of rear springs and add a leaf or two to yours. You will remove the rubber spring isolators to make room, then select some of the longer leavs from your "new" set and use them in the same position on your car. My Bird had a few half leaves and that is where I added one of the new ones, so I ended up with one additional full and one half leaf. As long as you remember that the front of the spring pack is mostly a control arm and the rear half is your "spring", you can get what you want with a little parts swapping. As a bonus, you may be able to get away without those ugly traction bars. I saw a guy get "high centered" on a speed bump once. Now that is NOT the look you want, stereo blasting, trying to look cool in front of everyone on the cruise... and you are stuck, rear tires spinning wildly one half inch off the ground.

  #12  
Old 09-16-2002, 12:53 PM
Bungee Bungee is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Diego, Californy
Posts: 322
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by 455HOGT37:
I saw a guy get "high centered" on a speed bump once. Now that is NOT the look you want, stereo blasting, trying to look cool in front of everyone on the cruise... and you are stuck, rear tires spinning wildly one half inch off the ground.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">

  #13  
Old 10-02-2002, 09:24 PM
spamburger17 spamburger17 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: ohio,usa
Posts: 141
Send a message via MSN to spamburger17
Default

You can also preload the leafs by attaching U bolts to the outter leafs and clamping them together slightly( the tighter, the more preload) itll help plant the tires some

  #14  
Old 10-03-2002, 06:57 AM
Half-Inch Stud's Avatar
Half-Inch Stud Half-Inch Stud is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: BlueBell, PA or AL U.S.A.
Posts: 18,476
Default

...and remove the steel bands on the rearward leaf stack...for that ol' Chrysler look.

__________________
12.24/111.6MPH/1.76 60'/28"/3.54:1/SP-TH400/469 R96A/236-244-112LC/1050&TorkerI//3850Lbs//15MPG/89oct

Sold 2003: 12.00/112MPH/1.61 60'/26"x3.31:1/10"/469 #48/245-255-110LSA/Q-Jet-Torker/3650Lbs//18MPG 94oct
Sold 1994: 11.00/123MPH/1.50 60'/29.5"x4.10:1/10"/469 #48/245-255-110LSA/Dual600s-Wenzler/3250Lbs//94oct
  #15  
Old 10-03-2002, 01:50 PM
ddouble's Avatar
ddouble ddouble is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: N.C.
Posts: 171
Default

As much as we may hate to admit it Chrysler had something right with the torsion bar front, loose leaf stack in the back and a pinion snubber. Some of those old Mopars would hook.

It sure did look funny when they would preload the suspension and the rear springs would spread like turkey feathers.

Dan

The DotRod rides again.

__________________
He's not the sharpest tool in the shed but he is a real tool.
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:58 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017