Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-25-2015, 09:44 PM
69*Goat's Avatar
69*Goat 69*Goat is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 515
Default Engine temp concerns

Ok, got a head scratcher here. A stroked 400 to a 461. My old cam and head combination was 9.5:1 #46 heads flowing 250CFM with the SD Stump puller cam. I had a short snout stamped impeller water pump that I clearance the divider plate on, and this engine would NEVER get above 180 deg. Now, I have swapped to Kauffman D-ports flowing 305CFM,10.6:1CR using the "Old Faithful" cam, and I have changed to a long snout cast impeller water pump. I also clearanced the divider plate, but this darn thing wants to stay at 200-220. It may be running a little lean, but I did some carb work on it today which improved it a little, but it is still running warmer than I like. I am running only water in the system right now, with a regular 180 thermostat.

Timing is 10 initial, 32 total

Any suggestions on where to start looking for the problem?

__________________
461 Cu. In. Pure Pontiac Power:

1969 Pontiac GTO - Back On Top - Popular Hot Rodding Magazine

Last edited by 69*Goat; 05-25-2015 at 10:05 PM.
  #2  
Old 05-26-2015, 10:49 AM
AdamIsAdam's Avatar
AdamIsAdam AdamIsAdam is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 2,285
Default

Subscribed...

__________________
Adam
__________________
1964 LeGTO
469, M21, 3.42

__________________
Sold:
1968 Pontiac LeMans Convertible
See it go HERE
  #3  
Old 05-26-2015, 08:10 PM
69*Goat's Avatar
69*Goat 69*Goat is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 515
Default

Ok, did some investigating when I got home.

Timing:

The total is 30, not 32. That is W/O any vacuum advance. If I hook it to ported vacuum, I get 36, if I hook it to manifold, I get 42.

I have a vacuum leak on the carb where the choke can /pot is bolted to the carb. I bet that is affecting what the ported vac on the carb is pulling. It is only pulling 5-7 inches of vacuum just off idle, where the manifold is pulling close to 20 inches just off idle.

Until I get this sieve of a carb changed, or fixed, there is not much more I can look at.

__________________
461 Cu. In. Pure Pontiac Power:

1969 Pontiac GTO - Back On Top - Popular Hot Rodding Magazine
  #4  
Old 05-26-2015, 08:24 PM
AdamIsAdam's Avatar
AdamIsAdam AdamIsAdam is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 2,285
Default

My understanding is that ported vacuum line should give you zero vacuum and thus zero advance at idle.

Also, 20" is a lot for your combo at idle. Others will chime in I'm sure. I have 12" and less of a cam as I recall.

__________________
Adam
__________________
1964 LeGTO
469, M21, 3.42

__________________
Sold:
1968 Pontiac LeMans Convertible
See it go HERE
  #5  
Old 06-10-2015, 03:58 PM
69*Goat's Avatar
69*Goat 69*Goat is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 515
Default

I'm about at my wits end with the temp issue. I have gotten the carb mixture right, I have the timing set at 32 deg total without vacuum advance, and I have the vac adv hooked to manifold vacuum. This is a new engine, i have put 100 miles on it, and after getting all of the above adjustments done the temp did drop to between 195-200. it is not getting above 200 right now. As I stated before, my old Iron headed set up never ran hotter than 185, all day long it would stay at 185. The CR with the iron heads was 9.5:1, and I know that it was running lean. My new aluminum headed set up has a CR of 10.6:1 and the AFR is where it should be.

Is the new setup the culprit?

Could the cast impeller water pump be pushing too much water through the system? and not allowing it to sit in the radiator long enough (That was one suggestion given to me)

I am going to go home and pull the thermostat housing and see what I see. I do remember when I pulled the engine apart for the new upgrades that the thermostat was wedged in the water crossover at an angle which was allowing water to get past the thermostat basically making it a restriction instead of blocking it off and waiting for the thermostat to open.

You guys have any suggestions?

__________________
461 Cu. In. Pure Pontiac Power:

1969 Pontiac GTO - Back On Top - Popular Hot Rodding Magazine
  #6  
Old 06-10-2015, 04:34 PM
ponyakr's Avatar
ponyakr ponyakr is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: North Louisiana
Posts: 7,621
Default

I'm certainly no cooling expert. But I've read that 12-14 initial and 34-36 total will usually run a few degrees cooler than 10 & 30.

And, are you using an adjustable vac can, so you can reduce the vac advance from the high intake vac advance numbers numbers ?

Are you running the same advance numbers you were with the other engine ?

I didn't see it mentioned, but are you using the same fan, shroud, and rad as before ?

I'm just assuming that with the extra energy generated by the lager engine, it will just naturally produce more heat. So, you may need to upgrade the entire system--bigger radiator, more fan power, etc.

The question of tranny cooling lines, usually comes up. If the fluid is routed thru the rad, that warms the coolant. And if an aux cooler is used and is directly in front of the rad, that will slightly increase coolant temp, by heat transfer and making it harder to pull air thru the rad and the tranny cooler. Hey, ALL these little things can add up to cooling problems.

Anybody have any luck with a GOOD pusher fan in front of the radiator, or AC condenser if you have one, as a helper for slow speed situations ? I read that one guy bought one and it hardly blew any air at all.

Another cooling question. I read that an electric fan from a Lincoln Mark VIII, will suck 5000cfm of air, on high speed. Anybody tried one ?

http://www.hotrod.com/how-to/engine/...ooling-system/

http://www.ebay.com/bhp/mark-viii-fan


Last edited by ponyakr; 06-10-2015 at 05:05 PM.
  #7  
Old 06-10-2015, 05:34 PM
72LuxuryLeMansLa.'s Avatar
72LuxuryLeMansLa. 72LuxuryLeMansLa. is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Eunice, La.
Posts: 3,181
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 69*Goat View Post
I'm about at my wits end with the temp issue. I have gotten the carb mixture right, I have the timing set at 32 deg total without vacuum advance, and I have the vac adv hooked to manifold vacuum. This is a new engine, i have put 100 miles on it, and after getting all of the above adjustments done the temp did drop to between 195-200. it is not getting above 200 right now. As I stated before, my old Iron headed set up never ran hotter than 185, all day long it would stay at 185. The CR with the iron heads was 9.5:1, and I know that it was running lean. My new aluminum headed set up has a CR of 10.6:1 and the AFR is where it should be.

Is the new setup the culprit?

Could the cast impeller water pump be pushing too much water through the system? and not allowing it to sit in the radiator long enough (That was one suggestion given to me)

I am going to go home and pull the thermostat housing and see what I see. I do remember when I pulled the engine apart for the new upgrades that the thermostat was wedged in the water crossover at an angle which was allowing water to get past the thermostat basically making it a restriction instead of blocking it off and waiting for the thermostat to open.

You guys have any suggestions?
Is this the same bottom end as before? What is the quench distance? Being new there can be some tightness causing excess friction and thereby more heat.....With regards to the thermostat, did you verify it's opening temp with a thermometer in a pot of water before install? There is almost no quality control these days and I've had 180°F thermostats open at 195-200°F.....That being said 200°F while not ideal is not going to hurt anything.

__________________
Karl

  #8  
Old 06-10-2015, 05:37 PM
69*Goat's Avatar
69*Goat 69*Goat is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 515
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ponyakr View Post
I'm certainly no cooling expert. But I've read that 12-14 initial and 34-36 total will usually run a few degrees cooler than 10 & 30.
Actually I am running 12 Initial now, with 20 Mechanical for 32 total. Jeff Kauffman told me that these heads don't really like more than 32 Degrees of timing (Not including Vac adv).

Quote:
Originally Posted by ponyakr View Post
And, are you using an adjustable vac can, so you can reduce the vac advance from the high intake vac advance numbers numbers ?
No Adj Vac can.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ponyakr View Post
Are you running the same advance numbers you were with the other engine ?
Yes, the only difference this go round is: I was using ported vacuum with the old set up.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ponyakr View Post
I didn't see it mentioned, but are you using the same fan, shroud, and rad as before ?
Yes

Quote:
Originally Posted by ponyakr View Post
I'm just assuming that with the extra energy generated by the lager engine, it will just naturally produce more heat. So, you may need to upgrade the entire system--bigger radiator, more fan power, etc.
It was same bore and stroke with the Iron heads on it. Maybe the higher Compression ratio.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ponyakr View Post
The question of tranny cooling lines, usually comes up. If the fluid is routed thru the rad, that warms the coolant. And if an aux cooler is used and is directly in front of the rad, that will slightly increase coolant temp, by heat transfer and making it harder to pull air thru the rad and the tranny cooler. Hey, ALL these little things can add up to cooling problems.
Yes, bigger trans cooler this go round 12" x 12" as opposed to 9" x 7" that was on it. The cooler is standing away from the radiator by about an 1".

Quote:
Originally Posted by ponyakr View Post
Anybody have any luck with a GOOD pusher fan in front of the radiator, or AC condenser if you have one, as a helper for slow speed situations ? I read that one guy bought one and it hardly blew any air at all.
I pulled All of the A/c Components off several years ago.

__________________
461 Cu. In. Pure Pontiac Power:

1969 Pontiac GTO - Back On Top - Popular Hot Rodding Magazine
  #9  
Old 06-10-2015, 05:41 PM
69*Goat's Avatar
69*Goat 69*Goat is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 515
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 72LuxuryLeMansLa. View Post
Is this the same bottom end as before? What is the quench distance? Being new there can be some tightness causing excess friction and thereby more heat.....With regards to the thermostat, did you verify it's opening temp with a thermometer in a pot of water before install? There is almost no quality control these days and I've had 180°F thermostats open at 195-200°F.....That being said 200°F while not ideal is not going to hurt anything.
Same bottom end as before, the only difference this time is Coated bearings, and coated piston skirts. I did not check the thermostat before install. I will do that tonight.

__________________
461 Cu. In. Pure Pontiac Power:

1969 Pontiac GTO - Back On Top - Popular Hot Rodding Magazine
  #10  
Old 06-10-2015, 05:44 PM
72LuxuryLeMansLa.'s Avatar
72LuxuryLeMansLa. 72LuxuryLeMansLa. is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Eunice, La.
Posts: 3,181
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 69*Goat View Post
Same bottom end as before, the only difference this time is Coated bearings, and coated piston skirts. I did not check the thermostat before install. I will do that tonight.
It was rebuilt then....This is what I mean about it being new/not broke in yet. I've even read that one of the guys on here had a rope seal that was too tight and it caused high temps.....

__________________
Karl

  #11  
Old 06-10-2015, 05:51 PM
69*Goat's Avatar
69*Goat 69*Goat is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 515
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 72LuxuryLeMansLa. View Post
It was rebuilt then....This is what I mean about it being new/not broke in yet. I've even read that one of the guys on here had a rope seal that was too tight and it caused high temps.....
Wow... BOP seal here.

__________________
461 Cu. In. Pure Pontiac Power:

1969 Pontiac GTO - Back On Top - Popular Hot Rodding Magazine
  #12  
Old 06-11-2015, 12:54 PM
frbformula's Avatar
frbformula frbformula is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: SE. Michigan
Posts: 312
Default

Get a laser temp gun and check the temps going into the radiator and coming out of the radiator. Also check temps where you sending unit is to verify that it is still reading correctly.

  #13  
Old 06-11-2015, 03:14 PM
Schurkey Schurkey is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The Seasonally Frozen Wastelands
Posts: 5,920
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 69*Goat View Post
Could the cast impeller water pump be pushing too much water through the system? and not allowing it to sit in the radiator long enough (That was one suggestion given to me)
Stop trusting whoever told you that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 69*Goat View Post
the thermostat was wedged in the water crossover at an angle which was allowing water to get past the thermostat basically making it a restriction instead of blocking it off and waiting for the thermostat to open.
That is NOT POSSIBLE if you have the proper thermostat and a correct-size thermo housing/water outlet. This is the first thing to inspect and repair.

  #14  
Old 06-11-2015, 03:33 PM
Chris65LeMans's Avatar
Chris65LeMans Chris65LeMans is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,595
Default

You said previously that the car doesn't get above 200. I'm not hearing a problem in there.

__________________
1965 Pontiac LeMans. M21, 3.73 in a 12 bolt, Kauffman 461.
  #15  
Old 06-11-2015, 03:57 PM
Larry Navarro's Avatar
Larry Navarro Larry Navarro is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Spring(Houston) Tx. USA
Posts: 6,369
Default

http://www.hotrod.com/how-to/engine/...ystem-upgrade/

  #16  
Old 06-11-2015, 04:16 PM
72LuxuryLeMansLa.'s Avatar
72LuxuryLeMansLa. 72LuxuryLeMansLa. is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Eunice, La.
Posts: 3,181
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Navarro View Post
So he had mismatched parts.......

__________________
Karl

  #17  
Old 06-11-2015, 04:19 PM
1967Tempest's Avatar
1967Tempest 1967Tempest is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Fayetteville, GA
Posts: 3,019
Send a message via MSN to 1967Tempest
Default

200* at idle or 200* doing 65 down the road.

Idle is usually effected by air movement through the rad and air in the system.

Highway speeds is either air is not going through the rad, but around it, or coolant movement.

If my car is running 195* and I am going down RT 15 here (Huge 4 mile downhill 55 MPH highway), the second I put it in neutral, the temps shoot up to over 205*. Almost instantly. I have the Lincoln Mark VIII electric fan set-up. Then when I get to the bottom of the hill, throw it 5th gear, the temps shoot down to under 170*. As soon as the RPM's of the water pump increase.

Also where is your temp sensor? In the coolant crossover? Keep in mind that spot is where the engine is putting out the hottest coolant back to the radiator.

New T-stat? (although the t-stat only regulates the MINIMUM operating temperature.)

Air sealing kit around rad?

Down flow or cross flow? Down flows seem to have issues if the rad hose is higher that the return inlet, air gets trapped.

Lower rad hose have the spring in it?

Are you sure that you burpped all of the air out of the system?

Mechanical or electric gauge?

ANd yes, if you are getting vacuum at the ported line at idle the carb has an issue.

__________________
1967 Pontiac Tempest 2dr HRDTP Coupe 468 C.I. 500 HP 5 speed = FUN!!!
1990 Chevy Suburban R2500 Daily Driver
1986 Volvo DL245 Wagon.. Project car!!!
The Burb Files
  #18  
Old 06-11-2015, 05:49 PM
69*Goat's Avatar
69*Goat 69*Goat is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 515
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris65LeMans View Post
You said previously that the car doesn't get above 200. I'm not hearing a problem in there.
Going from a Constant 180-185 to 200 bothers me...

Oil pressure decreases 5-7 PSI at that temp, and that bothers me...

Call me anal... :/

__________________
461 Cu. In. Pure Pontiac Power:

1969 Pontiac GTO - Back On Top - Popular Hot Rodding Magazine
  #19  
Old 06-11-2015, 05:52 PM
69*Goat's Avatar
69*Goat 69*Goat is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 515
Default

I did change over to Aluminum Pulleys from Ram Air Restoration with this build. After reading Larry's post, maybe I need to check that as well.

__________________
461 Cu. In. Pure Pontiac Power:

1969 Pontiac GTO - Back On Top - Popular Hot Rodding Magazine
  #20  
Old 06-11-2015, 06:21 PM
AdamIsAdam's Avatar
AdamIsAdam AdamIsAdam is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 2,285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 69*Goat View Post
Going from a Constant 180-185 to 200 bothers me...

Oil pressure decreases 5-7 PSI at that temp, and that bothers me...

Call me anal... :/
X2!

__________________
Adam
__________________
1964 LeGTO
469, M21, 3.42

__________________
Sold:
1968 Pontiac LeMans Convertible
See it go HERE
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:01 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017