Suspension TECH Including Brakes, Wheels and tires

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-02-2020, 10:21 PM
redonred81 redonred81 is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Montreal,quebec
Posts: 280
Default How to measure rear height on 74 TA

My 74 sits a little low on the rear.was wondering if its stock height or its sagging.do i change my leafs? I would like it a little higher.thanks.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	18BA3001-BB6F-4895-85A0-21E7D3A9719C.jpg
Views:	110
Size:	68.4 KB
ID:	544094   Click image for larger version

Name:	CED26E70-D09D-4EAD-B52A-F6C1FB8E9E43.jpg
Views:	114
Size:	76.9 KB
ID:	544095   Click image for larger version

Name:	45EA1A54-6563-4D48-B8E8-8C6B4F0744C8.jpg
Views:	108
Size:	76.3 KB
ID:	544096  

  #2  
Old 07-02-2020, 11:11 PM
blueghoast's Avatar
blueghoast blueghoast is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,409
Default

The car sit's perfecked in my opinion but a taller tire would do what your
wanting it to do. Then you would have two size tire's though.

GT.

  #3  
Old 07-02-2020, 11:43 PM
Stuart's Avatar
Stuart Stuart is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 7,938
Default

If you have a factory shop manual, the procedure for measuring ride height should be in there someplace. I don't know F bodies, but in general it's typically some dimension between part of the suspension and the frame.

  #4  
Old 07-03-2020, 08:12 AM
The Champ's Avatar
The Champ The Champ is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Rochester, MN
Posts: 2,536
Default

There already appears to be plenty of air space between the top of the tires and the fender lip. Not sure why you'd want more.

Taller tires would raise the rear and fill the air gap.

  #5  
Old 07-03-2020, 09:06 AM
Big Bear's Avatar
Big Bear Big Bear is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Ont Canada
Posts: 132
Default

Our 80 TA was bottoming out whenever we took passengers or had luggage on a trip so I bought Delco air shocks from Rock Auto to stiffen the ride when loaded. It did sit higher when unloaded so just let out some pressure to return it to original height. To go back to original just swap back to original shocks. I hope my 74 TA sits as nice as yours when finished.

  #6  
Old 07-03-2020, 09:55 AM
78w72 78w72 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: iowa
Posts: 4,718
Default

without knowing the size tires, i say that looks very close to stock & has a great stance. whatever you do dont jack up teh rear with aftermarket "5leaf" springs or air shocks! air shocks will make the rear ride much worse than stock type shocks... i had them back in the early 90's on a 2nd gen & the ride was terrible compared to even cheap monroe shocks.

if you want more height as others mentioned, get a taller/wider tire. stock size for 78-81 firebirds was 225/70/15 thats ~ 27.5" tall, a 255/60 is close to that height but wider than stock size & will fit a 15x7 rally 2 rim. some even go to the 275/60 thats closer to 28" tall but much wider, they will fit & work on a 15x7 but will have a little bit of a rounded sidewall. but again, i think it sits nice as is.

the manual has you measure the height from the rear rocker area to the ground, id have to check for the spec but im sure others can post it. the easier unofficial way to measure front or rear height is at the center of the wheel using the center cap then go from the ground to the bottom of the fender lip, quick easy way to know what changes were made with springs or tires. i have a stock suspension 81 t/a or a 1.5" lowered 72 firebird i can get you a measurement to compare to yours if you want.

  #7  
Old 07-03-2020, 02:04 PM
Formulajones's Avatar
Formulajones Formulajones is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 10,836
Default

Like mentioned, need to know tire heights for accurate results.

Assuming all tires are the same height, then having the car slightly lower in the back is correct and how GM designed them originally. This is to induce proper rocker drainage. Usually the difference is only about a 1/2"

Proper measurements are generally taken just in front of the rear tire from the bottom of the rocker near the pinch weld for the back.

The front is done just behind the front tire on the rocker near the pinch weld, not the bottom of the fender.

Each model car has it's own range of measurements that are considered "correct" ride height.

__________________
2019 Pontiac Heaven class winner

https://youtu.be/XqEydRRRwqE
  #8  
Old 07-03-2020, 05:16 PM
redonred81 redonred81 is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Montreal,quebec
Posts: 280
Default Tires

Im running stock size,225 70.heres a pic with honeys.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	image.jpg
Views:	80
Size:	45.1 KB
ID:	544189  

  #9  
Old 07-03-2020, 05:16 PM
redonred81 redonred81 is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Montreal,quebec
Posts: 280
Default

I guess i will leave it as is.

  #10  
Old 07-03-2020, 05:17 PM
redonred81 redonred81 is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Montreal,quebec
Posts: 280
Default

Thanks all

  #11  
Old 07-03-2020, 05:26 PM
78w72 78w72 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: iowa
Posts: 4,718
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by redonred81 View Post
Im running stock size,225 70.heres a pic with honeys.
that looks about perfect in my opinion.. any higher it will have that 70's/80's overly jacked up look! LOL! google some images of 2nd gen t/a's, most sit like that or a tad lower.

  #12  
Old 07-03-2020, 05:40 PM
redonred81 redonred81 is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Montreal,quebec
Posts: 280
Default

These cars were a little high in the front,maybe thats what make them look low in the back

  #13  
Old 07-03-2020, 05:46 PM
redonred81 redonred81 is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Montreal,quebec
Posts: 280
Default Pics

Here is back and front..maybe its just me lol
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	1D92D856-E8F5-4F1F-BD02-65C2882BC5DA.jpg
Views:	82
Size:	51.9 KB
ID:	544190   Click image for larger version

Name:	0F7EC63F-78DF-42FC-87D7-07803984F849.jpg
Views:	92
Size:	44.6 KB
ID:	544191  

  #14  
Old 07-04-2020, 09:07 AM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 20,576
Default

Measure from center of the wheel to fender lip to compare front and back.

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:31 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017