#1  
Old 07-30-2020, 08:02 PM
ignaro's Avatar
ignaro ignaro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 109
Default Am I measuring pushrods wrong?

I'm building a 461 stroker with Speedmaster heads and I need to order pushrods.

I initially used the method where you put a dry erase marker on the end of the valve (thanks Fast Monty's Garage!) and the rocker arm wears the ink off-- I got 9.135" on all valves.
Before ordering, I asked Butler to help me make sure I was doing it properly since they're hydraulic roller lifters and there are a lot of opintions out there. The Butler tech said he was certain I would wind up needing 8.800" pushrods and I must have done something wrong. I decided to keep learning and measuring until I got closer to that "known-correct" goal.

I thought that maybe the lifters were collapsing? I swapped to the checking springs and did it again. Got the same result.

More research, I found this video from Straub that explains the whole goal is to have the rocker arm be square to the valve at 1/2 lift. That makes a ton of sense.
I reset everything, drew a line on a rocker, have my checking springs, got it as square as I could by eye, and the pushrod came out to (drumroll please)... 9.135"! Literally the exact same as Monty's video.

The Johnson lifters want .035" +/- .010" of preload, so I think I need 9.170". They come in .050" increments so call it 9.150" pushrods.

Am I doing something wrong or is the Butler guy just remembering measurements from different lifters/rockers/heads?

461 with 10.230" deck height.
Speedmaster 72cc heads, round port.
.027" head gaskets
Johnson lifters 2112OPR
CompCams 1.5 ratio roller rockers CCA-19060

Thanks!

  #2  
Old 07-30-2020, 08:06 PM
ignaro's Avatar
ignaro ignaro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 109
Default

Photos showing the travel of the rocker arm and the witness mark on the valve. (Thanks, Monty!)

Sent from my SM-G988U1 using Tapatalk

  #3  
Old 07-30-2020, 08:58 PM
NeighborsComplaint's Avatar
NeighborsComplaint NeighborsComplaint is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Elgin
Posts: 2,468
Default

Was Butlers' guess based on their experience with ProComp cylinder heads?

__________________
Triple Black 1971 GTO
The Following User Says Thank You to NeighborsComplaint For This Useful Post:
  #4  
Old 07-30-2020, 09:10 PM
ignaro's Avatar
ignaro ignaro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 109
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NeighborsComplaint View Post
Was Butlers' guess based on their experience with ProComp cylinder heads?
They said so but I don't know. I'm also not sure whether or by how much they differ from E-heads

Sent from my SM-G988U1 using Tapatalk

  #5  
Old 07-30-2020, 11:12 PM
Old Man Taylor's Avatar
Old Man Taylor Old Man Taylor is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Escondido, CA, USA
Posts: 6,945
Default

I would go with the length you got to yield that swipe mark on the valve stem.

  #6  
Old 07-31-2020, 12:27 AM
Lee's Avatar
Lee Lee is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Crosby, TX (East of Houston)/Texas/USA
Posts: 2,054
Default

You got it correct. The Comp Cam rockers are designed differently than most other Pontiac rockers.

I recently built a motor, and had both Crower and CompCam (1.65) rockers handy. Iron heads, but HR cam/lifters. Crower rockers needed an 8.800" pushrod, Comp rockers needed 9.150".

FWIW, I think Butler is a GREAT source for parts, but not nearly as great for advice on street-oriented builds.

__________________
'73 T/A (clone). Low budget stock headed 8.3:1 455, 222/242 116lsa .443/.435 cam. FAST Sportsman EFI, 315rwhp/385rwtq on 87 octane. 13.12 @103.2, 1.91 60'.

'67 Firebird [sold], ; 11.27 @ 119.61, 7.167 @ 96.07, with UD 280/280 (108LSA/ 109 ICL)solid cam. [1.537, 7.233 @93.61, 11.46 @ 115.4 w/ old UD 288/296 108 hydraulic cam] Feb '05 HPP, home-ported "16" D-ports, dished pistons (pump gas only), 3.42 gears, 275/60 DR's, 750DP, T2, full exhaust

My webpage http://lnlpd.com/home
  #7  
Old 07-31-2020, 01:35 AM
Jack Gifford's Avatar
Jack Gifford Jack Gifford is offline
formerly 'Pontiac Jack'
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Phelps, NY 14532
Posts: 10,176
Default

FWIW- At half lift, the line that should be square to the valve centerline goes from the rocker's pivot center to the roller tip's center- not to the tip of the valve. This gives minimum "pattern" width, and also gives maximum valve travel at full lift. Note that this may not center the "pattern" on the valve tip- but that's not a concern.

__________________
Anybody else on this planet campaign a M/T hemi Pontiac for eleven seasons?
... or has built a record breaking DOHC hemi four cylinder Pontiac?
... or has driven a couple laps of Nuerburgring with Tri-Power Pontiac power?(back in 1967)
  #8  
Old 07-31-2020, 05:46 AM
steve25's Avatar
steve25 steve25 is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 14,632
Default

If your running any type of Hydro lifter remember that the amount you preload the lifter by will shorten up on the measurement you made with your adjustable push rod, so you need to factor that back in to the needed lenght of the push rod you order up to maintain perfect geometry.

__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs!
And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs!

1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set.

Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks.

1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes.
Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph.

Education is what your left with once you forget things!
  #9  
Old 07-31-2020, 11:03 AM
chiphead's Avatar
chiphead chiphead is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Aiken, SC
Posts: 5,182
Default

Agree on any phone advise. Trust but verify. The pushrod pocket on those comp lifters looks higher up on the rocker body, like it would want a longer pushrod than say a HS or a Crower Enduro rocker.

When I checked the length on my setup, it wanted 8.850" pushrods IIRC.
H-J lifters, Voodoo HR cam, iron heads, long valves at 1.8 IH, Crower enduro rockers. I used the Straub technique.

__________________
I could explain all this to the girl at the parts store, but she'd probably call the asylum.

White '67 LeMans 407/TH350/Ford 3.89... RIP
Red '67 LeMans. 407/TH400/Ford 3.25
  #10  
Old 07-31-2020, 02:15 PM
AG's Avatar
AG AG is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: NH
Posts: 3,240
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Man Taylor View Post
I would go with the length you got to yield that swipe mark on the valve stem.
X2, looks good.

__________________
1967 Firechicken, 499", Edl heads, 262/266@0.050" duration and 0.627"/0.643 lift SR cam, 3.90 gear, 28" tire, 3550#. 10.01@134.3 mph with a 1.45 60'. Still WAY under the rollbar rule.
  #11  
Old 07-31-2020, 02:30 PM
grandam1979 grandam1979 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ohio, Findlay
Posts: 1,428
Default

Is that guide plate bent or is it supposed to be like that?

  #12  
Old 07-31-2020, 02:33 PM
Tim Corcoran's Avatar
Tim Corcoran Tim Corcoran is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Willow Spring, North Carolina
Posts: 4,664
Default

If you use light checking springs on the valve will you get a more accurate measurement and not have to calculate in lifter plunger travel or will a light checking still depress the plunger.

__________________
Tim Corcoran
  #13  
Old 07-31-2020, 03:22 PM
chiphead's Avatar
chiphead chiphead is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Aiken, SC
Posts: 5,182
Default

Depends. My setup would collapse the HR lifters even with the light checking springs. The straub technique doesn't require rolling the motor through with a pushrod. However when you do roll it through to look for the tip wipe, the lifter was wanting to collapse. I used a set of washers on the adj pushrod locknut to hit the lifter body to keep it from collapsing. There is a margin of error, but not much if you do it right.

My wipe pattern was just outboard of the center, but since I'm using longer valves, its to be expected. Longer valve moves the contact patch outboard of center, since the valve is angled toward the rocker stud.

__________________
I could explain all this to the girl at the parts store, but she'd probably call the asylum.

White '67 LeMans 407/TH350/Ford 3.89... RIP
Red '67 LeMans. 407/TH400/Ford 3.25
  #14  
Old 07-31-2020, 08:01 PM
ponjohn's Avatar
ponjohn ponjohn is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 9,530
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee View Post
You got it correct. The Comp Cam rockers are designed differently than most other Pontiac rockers.

I recently built a motor, and had both Crower and CompCam (1.65) rockers handy. Iron heads, but HR cam/lifters. Crower rockers needed an 8.800" pushrod, Comp rockers needed 9.150".

FWIW, I think Butler is a GREAT source for parts, but not nearly as great for advice on street-oriented builds.

Sooooo, I build a combo. Want to switch from 1.5 to 1.65 rockers and there is a chance I may need different pushrods?

  #15  
Old 08-01-2020, 10:10 AM
Lee's Avatar
Lee Lee is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Crosby, TX (East of Houston)/Texas/USA
Posts: 2,054
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ponjohn View Post
Sooooo, I build a combo. Want to switch from 1.5 to 1.65 rockers and there is a chance I may need different pushrods?
If you are using the same brand/style of 1.65 rockers as the 1.5's, then you SHOULD be ok. It never hurts to measure and check, though.

__________________
'73 T/A (clone). Low budget stock headed 8.3:1 455, 222/242 116lsa .443/.435 cam. FAST Sportsman EFI, 315rwhp/385rwtq on 87 octane. 13.12 @103.2, 1.91 60'.

'67 Firebird [sold], ; 11.27 @ 119.61, 7.167 @ 96.07, with UD 280/280 (108LSA/ 109 ICL)solid cam. [1.537, 7.233 @93.61, 11.46 @ 115.4 w/ old UD 288/296 108 hydraulic cam] Feb '05 HPP, home-ported "16" D-ports, dished pistons (pump gas only), 3.42 gears, 275/60 DR's, 750DP, T2, full exhaust

My webpage http://lnlpd.com/home
  #16  
Old 08-01-2020, 10:45 AM
RocktimusPryme's Avatar
RocktimusPryme RocktimusPryme is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bedford, IN
Posts: 2,166
Default

https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=24s&...-fZyVI2ihwYBg4

If you want to check your previous work using a different method to see if it comes out close. This video helped me when I put my BBC together. I thought it was easy to follow.

__________________
1967 Firebird 462 580hp/590ftlbs
1962 Pontiac Catalina Safari Swapped in Turd of an Olds 455
Owner/Creator Catfish Motorsports
https://www.youtube.com/@CatfishMotorsports
  #17  
Old 08-01-2020, 01:12 PM
1968GTO421's Avatar
1968GTO421 1968GTO421 is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Travelers Rest, SC
Posts: 1,285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chiphead View Post
Agree on any phone advise. Trust but verify. The pushrod pocket on those comp lifters looks higher up on the rocker body, like it would want a longer pushrod than say a HS or a Crower Enduro rocker.

When I checked the length on my setup, it wanted 8.850" pushrods IIRC.
H-J lifters, Voodoo HR cam, iron heads, long valves at 1.8 IH, Crower enduro rockers. I used the Straub technique.
Thanks, an interesting way to check valve geometry, seems more accurate than others.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5is9BsH5OU

(Jeremy treed me on the video)

__________________


"No replacement for displacement!"

GTOAA--https://www.gtoaa.org/
  #18  
Old 08-10-2020, 10:30 PM
Tim Corcoran's Avatar
Tim Corcoran Tim Corcoran is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Willow Spring, North Carolina
Posts: 4,664
Default

That is a very good video and I love that method takes the guess work out of it

__________________
Tim Corcoran
  #19  
Old 08-24-2020, 08:08 AM
HWYSTR455's Avatar
HWYSTR455 HWYSTR455 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 14,658
Default

I swear by that method Straub uses.

You can get 'close enough' using the marker on tip method for a 'general' rebuild, but it's not telling the whole story.

.

__________________
.

1970 GTO Judge Tribute Pro-Tour Project 535 IA2
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=760624
1971 Trans Am 463, 315cfm E-head Sniper XFlow EFI, TKO600 extreme, 9", GW suspension, Baer brakes, pro tour car
https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...ght=procharger
Theme Song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zKAS...ature=youtu.be
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:03 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017