FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
'64 GP lower ball joints
Working on a '64 GP. Having a hard time finding lower ball joints that fit the 1 1/2" hole in the lower arm. All have the ones for 1 13/16" hole. Anyone else run into this? Know who has them?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
1959-1964 should be the same.
__________________
The difference between inlaws and outlaws? Outlaws are wanted |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Depends when in 1964 the vehicle was built. My 64 Catalina was assembled in March, 1964. It uses the same lower ball joints as a 65.
__________________
It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance. Dr. Thomas Sowell |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
I have never run into that!
__________________
The difference between inlaws and outlaws? Outlaws are wanted |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I know. It’s an oddball but ‘63/early ‘64 seems to be a change over period in front suspension parts.
__________________
It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance. Dr. Thomas Sowell |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I never ran into that either. Look on e-Bay for some NOS Moog ball joints..
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Are the lower ball joints on your '64 press fit? I don't see why the size of the hole in the lower A-arm would make a difference. I have a '64 GP built in December of '63 and the ball joints are attached to the lower A-arm by three small nuts and bolts each. Is that how the '65s are? I ordered my ball joints (uppers and lowers) a few years ago and got MOOG replacements. I don't remember having a problem finding them.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to AZ64GP For This Useful Post: | ||
#8
|
||||
|
||||
1959-1970 B Body Pontiac lower ball joints are not pressed in.
__________________
The difference between inlaws and outlaws? Outlaws are wanted |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
No they bolt in.. Thank God..
|
Reply |
|
|