#1  
Old 01-05-2021, 10:36 PM
jerry455 jerry455 is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: sterling hts mi
Posts: 296
Default Intake manifold differences

I was wondering about different intake manifolds. My new 455 is nearing completion and my buddy wants me to use an Edelbrock Performer RPM. I have Edelbrock round port heads and am using a hydraulic roller cam. He says it should make in the mid 500's horsepower. I would like to make my plain jane Firebird into a Formula or Trans Am. Both of them, I am pretty sure will have clearance problems with the RPM manifold. I would love to have the Formula hood functional, if I go that route. Is the aluminum H.O. manifold equivalent flowing to the RPM? I have seen the testing that Jim Hand has done and others. How well did a SD manifold flow versus the H.O.? I know that the repo H.O. manifolds are known for core shift and need to be ported to optimize port flow. Is the benefit of that manifold worth it for a low 12 second street driver? I tried searching for answers but I could not find any comparisons. I thought I would ask someone here who may have already gone down that road.

  #2  
Old 01-05-2021, 11:11 PM
i82much's Avatar
i82much i82much is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,786
Default

t2?

  #3  
Old 01-05-2021, 11:25 PM
ignaro's Avatar
ignaro ignaro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 109
Default

Isn't the Performer (non-rpm) designed for the hood clearance issues of some firebirds? They're cheap when used

Sent from my SM-G988U1 using Tapatalk

  #4  
Old 01-05-2021, 11:36 PM
Formulajones's Avatar
Formulajones Formulajones is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 10,788
Default

Having a Formula I can tell you the hood clearance sucks.

If you plan to make the Formula hood functional with the factory air cleaner you have virtually no wiggle room to play with, give or take about a 1/4" with the stock intake in place.

Been a long time since I've played with or seen a T2 but what I82much suggested might be a possible solution if you don't like the stock intakes. I do know the RPM does not fit. The problem with the single planes like the T2 is they don't really shine until you start running spacers on them, and then there goes that hood clearance again.

I've played with stock intakes on mine for years and I know many here have as well. In fact I'm pretty sure people like Cliff, Jim Hand, and others have ported different versions of the stock intakes, including the HO and iron pieces and found very little difference between them, while at the same time matching the performance of some of the aftermarket intakes.

I've had them on and off my engine and have been drag racing the car for more than 20 years. I currently run one of the aftermarket RAIV intakes on the car, (same as the HO piece) and can say without a doubt it makes no difference in ET or MPH on my car over the stock iron piece. While the ports don't look super pretty as cast, they have had no affect on performance at all. There are a lot of pretty fast Pontiacs out there with the stock intakes.

__________________
2019 Pontiac Heaven class winner

https://youtu.be/XqEydRRRwqE
  #5  
Old 01-05-2021, 11:36 PM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 18,764
Default

Street Doms are stock height.Tom

  #6  
Old 01-06-2021, 12:49 AM
JLMounce JLMounce is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Greeley, Colorado
Posts: 3,679
Send a message via AIM to JLMounce
Default

Are you running a carb or a throttle body injection system? If you’re going the entry level EFI route, consider the torker ii.

__________________
-Jason
1969 Pontiac Firebird
  #7  
Old 01-06-2021, 01:10 AM
77 TRASHCAN's Avatar
77 TRASHCAN 77 TRASHCAN is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 31May2013 Temporary home to the world's widest (that we know of) tornado. Lord, NO more Please...
Posts: 6,591
Default

Dave at SD Performance can port a stock intake, iron or aluminum, to fit your needs( yes, he is still porting iron intakes, just not heads).
If you read on his website, aftermarket versions of the factory aluminum intakes can be of terrible quality and may require welding, which isn’t free.

Sounds like you have an awesome engine! You’ll have to contact Dave via email. He’s a one an band and doesn’t have time to blab on the phone. Be patient!

__________________
1977 Black Trans Am 180 HP Auto, essentially base model T/A.
I'm the original owner, purchased May 7, 1977.

Shut it off
Shut it off
Buddy, I just shut your Prius down...
  #8  
Old 01-06-2021, 07:51 AM
Cliff R's Avatar
Cliff R Cliff R is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mount Vernon, Ohio 43050
Posts: 17,972
Default

Dave will port your intake, he uses a CNC scan of my intake.

On the dyno on a 440CID engine my intake made 497hp. Switching to an Edelbrock Performer RPM dropped to 491hp. Swapped on one of those HO reproduction intakes next and made 487hp.

Average power was best with the modified iron intake as well. I suppose the larger RPM may have a "crossover" point someplace where it starts to make more power than my modified iron intake.

I ran an RPM intake for a while on my current 455 and HATED it. Took some "cobbling" to get it under the hood, which included raising the throttle cable bracket, going to a 1" shorter Shaker and not being able to use a stock type air filter in it. Moving the lid 1" closer to the carb KILLED engine power and I couldn't even make a full drag strip pass with a lid on the air filter!

I ended up making a custom filter for the Shaker opening. Ran that set-up for a while then bought a real HO intake that Dave at SD CNC ported for me and modified with my CNC scan.

It allowed me to go back to all the factory air cleaner parts and guess what, it runs QUICKER in 60' times than the RPM intake! It gives up about 1mph on top end, but that's nothing compared to all the cobbling and drama required to fit an RPM intake under the hood on one of these cars.....FWIW.......

__________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a Veteran!
https://cliffshighperformance.com/
73 Ventura, SOLD 455, 3740lbs, 11.30's at 120mph, 1977 Pontiac Q-jet, HO intake, HEI, 10" converter, 3.42 gears, DOT's, 7.20's at 96mph and still WAY under the roll bar rule. Best ET to date 7.18 at 97MPH (1/8th mile),
  #9  
Old 01-06-2021, 10:28 AM
78w72 78w72 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: iowa
Posts: 4,682
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jerry455 View Post
I was wondering about different intake manifolds. My new 455 is nearing completion and my buddy wants me to use an Edelbrock Performer RPM. I have Edelbrock round port heads and am using a hydraulic roller cam. He says it should make in the mid 500's horsepower. I would like to make my plain jane Firebird into a Formula or Trans Am. Both of them, I am pretty sure will have clearance problems with the RPM manifold. I would love to have the Formula hood functional, if I go that route. Is the aluminum H.O. manifold equivalent flowing to the RPM? I have seen the testing that Jim Hand has done and others. How well did a SD manifold flow versus the H.O.? I know that the repo H.O. manifolds are known for core shift and need to be ported to optimize port flow. Is the benefit of that manifold worth it for a low 12 second street driver? I tried searching for answers but I could not find any comparisons. I thought I would ask someone here who may have already gone down that road.
X3 on the SD ported factory intake, i ran a iron one done to SD's "stage 3" porting & on a 72 firebird with 72cc Eheads & formula hood & the car runs low 11's but is mostly a street driver. i since changed to a factory HO intake with the same SD porting & runs just as good & looks much better.

to answer your question, no a stock HO or repro HO does not flow as goood as an RPM, but stock intakes are much better than non rpm performers & will probably support 12's in stock form, or you can do the notch trick on the plenum divider & do a hand gasket match to the E-head intake ports to improve it a bit. also keep in mind the factory SR (after 1972) & repro intakes have a shorter plenum depth than the original intakes according to rocky rotella's testing, not sure how much that hurts performance but something to consider if you want to get the most out of the intake.

  #10  
Old 01-06-2021, 11:17 AM
74Grandville 74Grandville is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Plainville, CT
Posts: 1,837
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tom s View Post
Street Doms are stock height.Tom
this would be my vote too. I just did a 400 swap on my TA and went with the HSD . I wanted the ability to run different carbs easily. i'm also using an edelbrock carb which i know is not normal, but it was what i had rebuilt on hand and it actually works really well. I had to make some modifications to make it work though. ( modify air cleaner, modify throttle bracket as it is WIDE)

I did start with a Q-jet, but it was way off on calibration and will move back to it on a later date.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	holley Street Dominator.jpg
Views:	228
Size:	89.6 KB
ID:	557661   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0681.jpg
Views:	200
Size:	70.4 KB
ID:	557662  

__________________
1979 Firebird Trans Am 301/4spd (Now 428)
1977 Firebird Formula 400/Auto
2007 Grand Prix GXP 5.3L

Last edited by 74Grandville; 01-06-2021 at 11:42 AM.
  #11  
Old 01-06-2021, 11:44 AM
78w72 78w72 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: iowa
Posts: 4,682
Default

street dominator intake is nice... but there is also a tomahawk or current brand name that is a copy of a street dominator ported by SD. they usually need some cleaning up of casting flash etc but might be a decent option for a single plane. i have a polished version i was going to try someday.

  #12  
Old 01-06-2021, 12:02 PM
Navy Horn 16 Navy Horn 16 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Dripping Springs, Texas
Posts: 802
Default

Drop base units open up a lot of options for "other than stock" air cleaners. The WFO 1, and Gen 2 units that Butler Performance sells will give you plenty of space to run a shaker with a taller than stock intake. I've run the Performer RPM/WFO-1 with no problems.

The problem with the Performer RPM is that there isn't enough "meat" in the runners to port match KRE ported heads (which I have). I'm running a ported Holley Street Dominator that I got from our own Steve Coombs, plus a 1 inch spacer which he well documented that makes more power than without the spacer. With the G2 drop base, I needed a half inch aluminum spacer between the carb and air cleaner to get the shaker height that I want.

I'm not suggesting that anyone try to copy my formula: HSD+ carb spacer - drop base + air cleaner spacer - shaker gasket = final height

I'm just saying there are a lot of options out there to run intakes other than stock. I've found that the limiting factor has been spread vs square bore. I'd run a Kauffman Northwind, but they don't make it in spreadbore so it won't work with a Q-Jet.

Here is a link to the puzzle pieces.

https://butlerperformance.com/c-1234...s-filters.html

__________________
77 Trans Am, 469 w/ported E-Heads via Kauffman, matched HSD intake, Butler Performance forged rotating assembly, Comp custom hyd roller, Q-jet, Art Carr 200 4R, 3.42s, 3 inch exhaust w/Doug's cutouts, D.U.I. Ignition. 7.40 in the 8th, 11.61@116.07 in the quarter...still tuning.

  #13  
Old 01-06-2021, 12:43 PM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 18,764
Default

A first gen with factory RA pans can only use a stock height intake.No room for a spacer so a Performer or the HSD or clones are pretty much the only options to run a square base carb.For a spread bore a factory intake is really hard to beat.Tom

  #14  
Old 01-06-2021, 01:55 PM
Formula8's Avatar
Formula8 Formula8 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,308
Default

There is a lot to this and I have a basement full of failed attempts to get mine to work. I started with PTFB's first "attempt" at a drop base which is a miserable POS. Didn't fit, didn't drop enough and sure as hell didn't flow anything. I ended up modifying the hell out of it, then adding an Air Raid 3" conical filter. If you want some entertainment on the hassle, go here: http://transamcountry.com/community/...?topic=53872.0

After a lot of attempts, it seems like PTFB finally has a product that meets expectations and although I am not a big fan of the way Dave handles his business or attacks customers critical of his products, it appears this last version which is suspiciously similar to what I did before his was released, is probably the best available at this time. I would definitely pick it up through Butler though

Also, here is a link to an article that provides some additional measurements and comparisons: https://www.hotrod.com/articles/hppp...d-replacement/

__________________
71 Formula 433, Splayed cap 400 block, 4" stroke Scat forged crank, 6.8 Eagle rods, custom Autotec pistons. SD 295 KRE D ports, Old faithful hybrid roller, Torker II, Holley Sniper Stealth, Tribal Tubes, TKO 600, 3.73 Eaton posi.
  #15  
Old 01-06-2021, 02:13 PM
Cliff R's Avatar
Cliff R Cliff R is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mount Vernon, Ohio 43050
Posts: 17,972
Default

Very few folks actually test many of these parts and combinations of parts.

What I can tell you from street and track testing is that more times than not any gains from a bigger/taller intake, or moving to a single plane intake with a spacer, then having to use a "drop base" style air cleaner is moving the air cleaner lid too close to the carburetor hurts power in the upper mid-range and top end..

Don't be fooled by dyno testing with single plane intakes with spacers on them, or the 1" taller RPM intake that show improved top end power. IF you don't back up that testing after the engine makes it to the vehicle and you've had to use a drop base air cleaner it doesn't really qualify as a complete test.

I found all this out actually testing every single intake that will fit under the hood of the Ventura. To get the taller intakes or single plane intakes with spacers to work at all I had to REMOVE the stock type air filter and make a custom one for the opening in the Shaker.

On private track rentals and even at the HPP "Shootout" at Norwalk in the early 2000's I did some back to back intake and carb testing. Kind of interesting but after all the testing the best runs were with the "modified" iron intake with no spacer on it. The highest MPH was obtained with a Tomahawk intake with a custom made well blended 1" spacer on it and my 4781-2 Holley DP carb. That combo actually ran nearly 2mph FASTER than all other combinations, but gave up enough in 60' and short times that the "modified" factory intake w/o a spacer netter a slightly quicker ET.

I also dyno and track tested 4 different 1" spacers, 4 hole, fully open, fully divided and semi-open. The best of those was the semi-open very close to what Jim Hand uses and describes in his book. It was worth nearly 2 more MPH than all other combinations.

Anyhow, the Performer intake FAILED every attempt I tried to test it. My engines just flat hate that intake and I was never able to make a complete full throttle pass with one. For some reason it induces a HUGE hesitation/stumble/bog when I go quickly to full throttle that will NOT tune out.

I suppose the engine just sees it as a restriction of some sort, doesn't matter, I gave up on it and went with the RPM until I obtained a real HO intake CNC ported to my KRE heads by Dave at SD. That intake fits, no spacer required, and outruns everything else I've tried to date........Cliff

PS: note that I call my factory iron and HO intake "modified". That just helps to keep the Trolls and other naysayers from busting my balls because I'm a "hot-rodder" and LOVE messaging factory parts to run as well as and often better than shiny aftermarket stuff!......

__________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a Veteran!
https://cliffshighperformance.com/
73 Ventura, SOLD 455, 3740lbs, 11.30's at 120mph, 1977 Pontiac Q-jet, HO intake, HEI, 10" converter, 3.42 gears, DOT's, 7.20's at 96mph and still WAY under the roll bar rule. Best ET to date 7.18 at 97MPH (1/8th mile),
  #16  
Old 01-06-2021, 03:01 PM
Bruce Meyer's Avatar
Bruce Meyer Bruce Meyer is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 1,385
Default

If your planning to go with a squarebore Holley carb my first pick would be a Torker 2. If your going with a Q-jet or another Spreadbore carb then I would say the stock intake is pretty good. I wouldn't try to run a spreadbore carb on a Torker 2 or a square bore Holley on a stock intake.

  #17  
Old 01-06-2021, 03:29 PM
Steve C. Steve C. is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Liberty Hill, Tx. (Austin)
Posts: 10,385
Default

Both the Holley Street Dominator intake and the Tomahawk intake are able to be ported to a height of 2.300" with about 0.250" above for a gasket seal.


.

__________________
'70 TA / 505 cid / same engine but revised ( previous best 10.63 at 127.05 )
Old information here:
http://www.hotrod.com/articles/0712p...tiac-trans-am/

Sponsor of the world's fastest Pontiac powered Ford Fairmont (engine)
5.14 at 140 mph (1/8 mile) , true 10.5 tire, stock type suspension
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDoJnIP3HgE
  #18  
Old 01-06-2021, 04:16 PM
77 TRASHCAN's Avatar
77 TRASHCAN 77 TRASHCAN is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 31May2013 Temporary home to the world's widest (that we know of) tornado. Lord, NO more Please...
Posts: 6,591
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliff R View Post
Very few folks actually test many of these parts and combinations of parts.


PS: note that I call my factory iron and HO intake "modified". That just helps to keep the Trolls and other naysayers from busting my balls because I'm a "hot-rodder" and LOVE messaging factory parts to run as well as and often better than shiny aftermarket stuff!......


LOL, I remember some folks having BIG issues with your "Hot Rodded" intakes...

__________________
1977 Black Trans Am 180 HP Auto, essentially base model T/A.
I'm the original owner, purchased May 7, 1977.

Shut it off
Shut it off
Buddy, I just shut your Prius down...
  #19  
Old 01-06-2021, 07:48 PM
Cliff R's Avatar
Cliff R Cliff R is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mount Vernon, Ohio 43050
Posts: 17,972
Default

Ya, but they never once point out that they OUTRAN intakes made by folks who had a "clean slate" to work with, so no rules and few limitations. They just cry "foul" instead.

I'd also add here that these companies are marketing genius's. They tell us that all these parts are just waiting to be installed to make MORE power at every RPM, walk on more water and leap taller buildings. I been watching folks yank the EXCELLENT cast iron intakes off of SBC engines for half a century now and replace them with aluminum intakes that do nothing more that unload some money out of your wallet and take a few pounds off the front of the vehicle. In at least 95 percent of the applications they are used in you just end up with no more if as much power and loose some thermal efficiency until the engine is really well heat soaked.....FWIW......

__________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a Veteran!
https://cliffshighperformance.com/
73 Ventura, SOLD 455, 3740lbs, 11.30's at 120mph, 1977 Pontiac Q-jet, HO intake, HEI, 10" converter, 3.42 gears, DOT's, 7.20's at 96mph and still WAY under the roll bar rule. Best ET to date 7.18 at 97MPH (1/8th mile),
  #20  
Old 01-06-2021, 07:52 PM
Cliff R's Avatar
Cliff R Cliff R is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mount Vernon, Ohio 43050
Posts: 17,972
Default

"If your planning to go with a squarebore Holley carb my first pick would be a Torker 2."

+2, the T-II is an EXCELLENT intake. I have seen it used more times than I can count to get the best power numbers out of these engines, and it absolutely LOVES a 1" spacer that's been well blended into the plenum areas.......

__________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a Veteran!
https://cliffshighperformance.com/
73 Ventura, SOLD 455, 3740lbs, 11.30's at 120mph, 1977 Pontiac Q-jet, HO intake, HEI, 10" converter, 3.42 gears, DOT's, 7.20's at 96mph and still WAY under the roll bar rule. Best ET to date 7.18 at 97MPH (1/8th mile),
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:06 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017