Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-09-2019, 05:42 PM
beertracker's Avatar
beertracker beertracker is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Banana Democracy of America
Posts: 481
Default 455 Main Bore Diameters

Could someone tell me what the main bore housing diameter for a 455 should be? Mine measure 3.4264-3.4268 without bearings installed and caps torqued. I am using a telescoping gauge and calibrated .0001" mic for measurements.

The crank main journals have been cut .010".

__________________
  #2  
Old 11-09-2019, 05:59 PM
llwta76 llwta76 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,203
Default

3.4380-3.4390 is the range. Trying to hold the main housing bores near the middle of that range is best. Larry

  #3  
Old 11-09-2019, 06:09 PM
Bill Hanlon's Avatar
Bill Hanlon Bill Hanlon is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fredericksburg, TX
Posts: 2,349
Default

Then how did beertracker's get smaller?

__________________
My Pontiac is a '57 GMC with its original 347" Pontiac V8 and dual-range Hydra-Matic.
  #4  
Old 11-09-2019, 06:29 PM
johnta1's Avatar
johnta1 johnta1 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: now sunny Florida!
Posts: 21,265
Default

I'd say he needs to remeasure it?

This is the block measurement without the bearings in the bore correct?


__________________
John Wallace - johnta1
Pontiac Power RULES !!!
www.wallaceracing.com

Winner of Top Class at Pontiac Nationals, 2004 Cordova
Winner of Quick 16 At Ames 2004 Pontiac Tripower Nats

KRE's MR-1 - 1st 5 second Pontiac block ever!


"Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts."

"People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid." – Socrates
  #5  
Old 11-09-2019, 08:36 PM
beertracker's Avatar
beertracker beertracker is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Banana Democracy of America
Posts: 481
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by llwta76 View Post
3.4380-3.4390 is the range. Trying to hold the main housing bores near the middle of that range is best. Larry
The numbers in above quote are without main bearings and the caps are torqued, right? My numbers in the first post are smaller than these. I will recheck my numbers. Maybe I mis-read the mic? If I did I am consistently wrong five times.

__________________
  #6  
Old 11-09-2019, 11:20 PM
beertracker's Avatar
beertracker beertracker is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Banana Democracy of America
Posts: 481
Default

I re-measured #1 main housing bore (no bearing installed, cap torqued) and the number was the same. So I am reading the mic correctly and the number is too small. I paid the shop to run a align bore test and they told me my block does not need a align bore so none was performed. Apparently my shop did not not check the main bore housing diameter. I supppose that is extra money for that service?

Does anyone have any solutions beside having the main housing bores re-bored to spec? I suppose that is called a align bore job? The other solution is to quit while I am ahead.

__________________
  #7  
Old 11-09-2019, 11:35 PM
AG's Avatar
AG AG is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: NH
Posts: 3,249
Default

You need to get a dial bore gauge.

__________________
1967 Firechicken, 499", Edl heads, 262/266@0.050" duration and 0.627"/0.643 lift SR cam, 3.90 gear, 28" tire, 3550#. 10.01@134.3 mph with a 1.45 60'. Still WAY under the rollbar rule.
  #8  
Old 11-10-2019, 12:07 AM
llwta76 llwta76 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,203
Default

This ^. Or take it to ANOTHER shop to check while you wait. ( I wouldn't go back to them for any work )
Your readings are over .011" too small

  #9  
Old 11-10-2019, 02:21 AM
chiphead's Avatar
chiphead chiphead is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Aiken, SC
Posts: 5,185
Default

Did you use a telescoping snap gauge? Not nearly accurate enough for measuring a precision hole down to .001. You need a dial bore gauge with a dial readout. Even a cheap Fowler with a .0005" dial would be OK.

.011" too small is a gigantic, unimaginable undersize. No way a crank would rotate with housings that small. It's got to be a measurement error??

The correct machining procedure would be a line hone to correct slightly under/oversized crank tunnel with original caps. Line bore is a more involved and aggressive process for fitting replacement caps. Do you know if the caps are original to this block?

__________________
I could explain all this to the girl at the parts store, but she'd probably call the asylum.

White '67 LeMans 407/TH350/Ford 3.89... RIP
Red '67 LeMans. 407/TH400/Ford 3.25

Last edited by chiphead; 11-10-2019 at 02:31 AM.
  #10  
Old 11-10-2019, 07:40 AM
steve25's Avatar
steve25 steve25 is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 14,737
Default

The your motor has the same main Bore size as the 421 listed here.

The first shot list Bearing clearance ranges for street motors, and the second shot for race.

This info posted was out of the Federal Mogal Bearing book.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0816.jpg
Views:	149
Size:	70.1 KB
ID:	524151   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0819.jpg
Views:	109
Size:	59.0 KB
ID:	524152   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0820.jpg
Views:	100
Size:	60.1 KB
ID:	524153  

__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs!
And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs!

1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set.

Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks.

1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes.
Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph.

Education is what your left with once you forget things!
  #11  
Old 11-10-2019, 10:44 AM
"QUICK-SILVER" "QUICK-SILVER" is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: LaFayette Georgia
Posts: 5,514
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by beertracker View Post
I am using a telescoping gauge.
Ends on this guage flat or round?

Are you seeing any difference between up down measurement and parting line measurement?

Does parting line have a lip or stair step that you can feel?

Buffalo Springfield "For What It's Worth"
There's something happening here
What it is ain't exactly clear

Clay

  #12  
Old 11-10-2019, 10:47 AM
beertracker's Avatar
beertracker beertracker is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Banana Democracy of America
Posts: 481
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chiphead View Post
Did you use a telescoping snap gauge? Not nearly accurate enough for measuring a precision hole down to .001. You need a dial bore gauge with a dial readout. Even a cheap Fowler with a .0005" dial would be OK.

.011" too small is a gigantic, unimaginable undersize. No way a crank would rotate with housings that small. It's got to be a measurement error??

The correct machining procedure would be a line hone to correct slightly under/oversized crank tunnel with original caps. Line bore is a more involved and aggressive process for fitting replacement caps. Do you know if the caps are original to this block?
Yes, I am using a telescoping snap gauge and calibrated .0001 resolution mic. Strange thing is I asked the same question over on PSP forum and never got a answer. I don't know if the caps are original to the block. bt

__________________

Last edited by beertracker; 11-10-2019 at 10:52 AM.
  #13  
Old 11-10-2019, 11:01 AM
beertracker's Avatar
beertracker beertracker is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Banana Democracy of America
Posts: 481
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by steve25 View Post
The your motor has the same main Bore size as the 421 listed here.

The first shot list Bearing clearance ranges for street motors, and the second shot for race.

This info posted was out of the Federal Mogal Bearing book.
Thank you for the info. bt

__________________
  #14  
Old 11-10-2019, 11:32 AM
beertracker's Avatar
beertracker beertracker is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Banana Democracy of America
Posts: 481
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by "QUICK-SILVER" View Post
Ends on this guage flat or round?

Are you seeing any difference between up down measurement and parting line measurement?

Does parting line have a lip or stair step that you can feel?

Buffalo Springfield "For What It's Worth"
There's something happening here
What it is ain't exactly clear

Clay
Snap gauge ends are rounded.
All measurements were taken at 12:00 and 6:00 positions. Will check 9:00 and 3:00 positions.
No lip or stair step felt or gap at parting line.

Agree with Buffalo Springfield

__________________
  #15  
Old 11-10-2019, 03:27 PM
hurryinhoosier62 hurryinhoosier62 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Floyd Co., IN/SE KY
Posts: 3,931
Default

Most times when the main caps are not original to the block the main saddle is actually larger than spec, not .011 too tight. At this point, you’d be better off to take the block back to the original shop and have them mic the main saddle with you present. Take a Sharpie and write each measurement on the pan rail.

__________________
“It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance.”

Dr. Thomas Sowell
  #16  
Old 11-10-2019, 06:31 PM
beertracker's Avatar
beertracker beertracker is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Banana Democracy of America
Posts: 481
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by hurryinhoosier62 View Post
Most times when the main caps are not original to the block the main saddle is actually larger than spec, not .011 too tight. At this point, you’d be better off to take the block back to the original shop and have them mic the main saddle with you present. Take a Sharpie and write each measurement on the pan rail.
Good idea, thanks, bt

__________________
  #17  
Old 11-10-2019, 10:04 PM
Half-Inch Stud's Avatar
Half-Inch Stud Half-Inch Stud is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: BlueBell, PA or AL U.S.A.
Posts: 18,473
Default

Measure at 70F, two mesurements where 1 measure is 90 degrees from the other.

  #18  
Old 11-13-2019, 06:51 PM
beertracker's Avatar
beertracker beertracker is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Banana Democracy of America
Posts: 481
Default

Problem solved I was mis-reading the mic. I was one decimal place off. Thank to all who helped. bt

__________________
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:35 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017