Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-01-2011, 12:23 AM
A.W.Dille A.W.Dille is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mocksville, North Carolina
Posts: 1,701
Default Rusted frame rail

I just saw that the rear frame rail on the drivers side of my 85 Grand Prix is about gone. Since this is my daily driver (listed in my signature) I'm now faced with whether to fix it or hunt another body for the engine and trans. I have been driving this car for over ten years and just completely rebuilt the entire front end last year and just removed the landau top on it and was planning on new paint and putting the 400 back in it. Now I'm torn about if it's worth saving or not.

__________________
1971 GTO,72 400, stock bottom end, 670 heads, Lunati BMII cam, headers, iron intake Q-jet, four speed. Best 60 ft 1.806in 2004. Best 1/8th mile e.t. 8.46 with 3.55 open rear
85 Grand Prix, 70 400, casting 62 heads stock rebuild, Turbo 350 trans 78 800 cfm Q-jet modified as per Cliff Ruggles book.
87 F350 6.9 4 speed dually

A poor man has poor ways.
  #2  
Old 07-01-2011, 09:36 AM
Mr Twister's Avatar
Mr Twister Mr Twister is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wayland, Michigan
Posts: 934
Default

There is a guy that advertises on maliburacing dot com that sells replacment frame sections. Here is the address: http://www3.sympatico.ca/conradlozier/

  #3  
Old 07-01-2011, 11:30 PM
A.W.Dille A.W.Dille is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mocksville, North Carolina
Posts: 1,701
Default

Mr Twister, thanks for the link. I'll get in contact with them and check on pricing. I really like my GP and don't want to junk it on account of the rusted frame rail. In fact future plans are for the 400 to go back in with a tri-power or a 400stroker (428) with tri-power and overdrive and still be my daily driver.

__________________
1971 GTO,72 400, stock bottom end, 670 heads, Lunati BMII cam, headers, iron intake Q-jet, four speed. Best 60 ft 1.806in 2004. Best 1/8th mile e.t. 8.46 with 3.55 open rear
85 Grand Prix, 70 400, casting 62 heads stock rebuild, Turbo 350 trans 78 800 cfm Q-jet modified as per Cliff Ruggles book.
87 F350 6.9 4 speed dually

A poor man has poor ways.
  #4  
Old 07-02-2011, 06:35 AM
stevep's Avatar
stevep stevep is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mendon Mass
Posts: 6,595
Default

I had a 79 4 speed Grand Am 15 years ago that had a rotted right rear frame rail. I bought a good used rail and had a local welding shop replace it. You could not tell that anything as ever wrong after he was done.

__________________
The difference between inlaws and outlaws? Outlaws are wanted
  #5  
Old 07-02-2011, 09:06 AM
Sirrotica's Avatar
Sirrotica Sirrotica is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Catawba Ohio
Posts: 7,210
Default

AW, This is a very common problem that showed up years ago in the cars in the rust belt. When I lived in Erie PA I replaced or repaired probably 10 or so on G body cars. Anyone that has good fabricating skills can replace one from a donor car and as has been said already, the repair would not even be evident. If the rest of the car is sound I would just replace the frame rail. The problem is caused by the way the rail was designed, it picks up mud and salt kicked up from the rear wheels and it just lays there damp and eventually the bottom of the rail falls apart. Most times the sides are still intact which is why sometimes I just replaced the metal on the bottom of the rail. Good luck on the repair........................

__________________
Brad Yost
1973 T/A (SOLD)
2005 GTO
1984 Grand Prix

100% Pontiacs in my driveway!!! What's in your driveway?

If you don't take some of the RACETRACK home with you, Ya got cheated

  #6  
Old 07-03-2011, 12:22 AM
A.W.Dille A.W.Dille is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mocksville, North Carolina
Posts: 1,701
Default

Thanks Brad, but this is a southern car bought new here in North Carolina. The rest of the car is in really good shape so I'll likely get a rail out of a car in one of the local yards here. I'm experienced in body and frame work so likely I'll weld in the replacement myself. Thanks again guys.

__________________
1971 GTO,72 400, stock bottom end, 670 heads, Lunati BMII cam, headers, iron intake Q-jet, four speed. Best 60 ft 1.806in 2004. Best 1/8th mile e.t. 8.46 with 3.55 open rear
85 Grand Prix, 70 400, casting 62 heads stock rebuild, Turbo 350 trans 78 800 cfm Q-jet modified as per Cliff Ruggles book.
87 F350 6.9 4 speed dually

A poor man has poor ways.
  #7  
Old 07-03-2011, 09:25 AM
Sirrotica's Avatar
Sirrotica Sirrotica is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Catawba Ohio
Posts: 7,210
Default

My point was in a southern car it just takes longer for it to become evident that it was a poor design and will eventually rot with that southern clay too, it just takes longer to rust from the inside out without the chemical assistance from our calcium chloride we use so abundantly for ice control. In the day we had wreckers up north that would buy southern rails and ship them and sell rust free rails to us to repair our rotted out rust belt brethren. I'm betting if you examine your cars frame you'll find some mud caked inside. I have an 86 GP that spent it's whole life in Ohio and it's not rotted out because evidently someone kept the mud and salt out of the frame. It could be due to bad recycled metal too, but all the ones I have worked on were filled with mud too. In fairness it's also fairly thin metal in that area, also another reason it is predisposed to rusting. Just my observations over the years.............

__________________
Brad Yost
1973 T/A (SOLD)
2005 GTO
1984 Grand Prix

100% Pontiacs in my driveway!!! What's in your driveway?

If you don't take some of the RACETRACK home with you, Ya got cheated

  #8  
Old 07-03-2011, 09:48 AM
Hammertime Mike's Avatar
Hammertime Mike Hammertime Mike is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 986
Send a message via ICQ to Hammertime Mike
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirrotica View Post
My point was in a southern car it just takes longer for it to become evident that it was a poor design and will eventually rot with that southern clay too, it just takes longer to rust from the inside out without the chemical assistance from our calcium chloride we use so abundantly for ice control. In the day we had wreckers up north that would buy southern rails and ship them and sell rust free rails to us to repair our rotted out rust belt brethren. I'm betting if you examine your cars frame you'll find some mud caked inside. I have an 86 GP that spent it's whole life in Ohio and it's not rotted out because evidently someone kept the mud and salt out of the frame. It could be due to bad recycled metal too, but all the ones I have worked on were filled with mud too. In fairness it's also fairly thin metal in that area, also another reason it is predisposed to rusting. Just my observations over the years.............
Your right, coming from upstate NY, we were replacing those rear rails within five years. Fortunately it's not a bad fix. We had a guy who made his yearly trip to the Talladaga races. He had hooked up with a bone yard down there and would bring back a pile of those rear rails.

__________________
  #9  
Old 07-03-2011, 10:59 PM
A.W.Dille A.W.Dille is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mocksville, North Carolina
Posts: 1,701
Default

Brad I know all about the salt and other stuff used on the roads in Ohio and the toll that is taken on vehicles in the north. I brought my GTO south with me when I moved down here from Ohio in 95, still fixing rust in the body and the original frame is long gone. Five years ago when I took the GP apart to paint it and do the conversion from the V6 to the Pontiac engine I went through and cleaned every inch of frame I could get to, drivers side was packed full but the frame itself was solid. Even though I do my best to keep the unside clean I guess that things can get overlooked at times. Just bothers me that this isn't a good time for me to contend with this when I getting ready to tear into the engine to try to locate a miss and put in another transmission. Looks as though the GTO is going to get more than normal use the next few weeks.

__________________
1971 GTO,72 400, stock bottom end, 670 heads, Lunati BMII cam, headers, iron intake Q-jet, four speed. Best 60 ft 1.806in 2004. Best 1/8th mile e.t. 8.46 with 3.55 open rear
85 Grand Prix, 70 400, casting 62 heads stock rebuild, Turbo 350 trans 78 800 cfm Q-jet modified as per Cliff Ruggles book.
87 F350 6.9 4 speed dually

A poor man has poor ways.
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:35 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017