FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#121
|
|||
|
|||
I’ll post all the details this weekend, keep in mind it won’t be apples to apples comparison because I have mechanical secondaries vs your vac. secondaries. In the meantime you may want to provide us more information on your carb, eng., trans, etc.
I should mention I did upgrade my HEI (after throwing a bunch of new parts at it while chasing the stab and stumble issue) with an aftermarket blue tooth HEI with fully adjustable timing curve, someone of the best money ever spent. Will have to check if the stumble was resolved before or after the new HEI install. |
#122
|
|||
|
|||
An AFR spike will always show for a split second be it from off idle to full throttle or from cruise to full throttle. What you want to see is instant recovery of the AFR after the quick AFR spike.
It is interesting how many carb issues show up in non Holley carbs or modified carbs.
__________________
466 Mike Voycey shortblock, 310cfm SD KRE heads, SD "OF 2.0 cam", torker 2 373 gears 3200 Continental Convertor best et 10.679/127.5/1.533 60ft 308 gears best et 10.76/125.64/1.5471 |
#123
|
|||
|
|||
Dido ta man, thats exactly what shows up on my data log chart a momentary lean spike, instant AFR recovery with no sign of any stumble or hesitation.
|
#124
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I’m able to tune around most of the issues. My biggest hang up right now is stabbing the pedal to full throttle (or sometimes 1/2 throttle). The AFR will spike up to 19-20 and the car will just hang. I usually have to back off the pedal at that point, and the car will pick up and go. Anything less than a rapid stab — ie, if if I roll into full throttle just a bit — it roars through the full rpm just fine. This seems like the area that should be covered by the accelerator shot. But I have maxed out the pump shot (up to 50cc with .047 shooter and big yellow cam) and it doesn’t overcome the lean spike. You can see the AFR dive initially for a split second but then it shoots up lean. Here are some examples from logged runs. Interestingly, my Edelbrock 800 AVS2 never had lean spikes at initial throttle opening, on the graph or in the seat (not saying it’s a better carb, just an interesting note).
__________________
1976 Trans Am Buccaneer Red 468ci, 10.5:1 CR, 87 CC RPM CNC e-heads, HR 282/288, 230/236, 561/.573 lift, Johnson Lifters & HS 1.65 Rockers |
#125
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Your bluetooth HEI sounds cool. I sometimes wonder why we pay $500+ bucks for MSD distributors that give you just a handful of advance curve options with springs and weights, when this could easily be handled electronically with 100% adjustability. But then again I also just recently . . . . paid $500+ bucks for an MSD distributor that gives you just a handful of advance curve options with springs and weights. Here is my current build: 1976 468 CID; 10:5 CR Forged 4.25 crank; ICON forged flat-top pistons 4.3cc relief HR 230/236 @ .050; 282/288 adv.; ground on 112 LSA .561/.573 lift w/ HS 1.65 rockers 87cc Round Port E-Heads Performer RPM 850 Speed Demon VS MSD ignition system Doug’s Headers TH350 3,000 stall PTC converter 3.73 axle ratio Pypes exhaust w/ X crossover
__________________
1976 Trans Am Buccaneer Red 468ci, 10.5:1 CR, 87 CC RPM CNC e-heads, HR 282/288, 230/236, 561/.573 lift, Johnson Lifters & HS 1.65 Rockers |
#126
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
1967 Firechicken, 499", Edl heads, 262/266@0.050" duration and 0.627"/0.643 lift SR cam, 3.90 gear, 28" tire, 3550#. 10.01@134.3 mph with a 1.45 60'. Still WAY under the rollbar rule. |
#127
|
|||
|
|||
Brentco, any carb spacer on that RPM intake?
Also, if you have timing specs please also provide that info. |
#128
|
||||
|
||||
I agree it’s a big shot. To get into more detail, after installing the 50cc pump I started with the 47 nozzle, and it made a richer initial AFR dive than necessary — sometimes down to the 10-11 range. So I worked back up to a smaller nozzle to extend the bigger shot out over a longer period. There is a 37 nozzle on there now, which (usually) only drops the AFR to around the 12 range during that initial rich dive. So going any smaller on the nozzle would not give enough shot up front.
__________________
1976 Trans Am Buccaneer Red 468ci, 10.5:1 CR, 87 CC RPM CNC e-heads, HR 282/288, 230/236, 561/.573 lift, Johnson Lifters & HS 1.65 Rockers |
#129
|
|||
|
|||
Consider testing with a CO and HC meter instead of, or in addition to an O2 sensor. Perhaps a full "4- or 5-gas" analyzer.
CO is an enormously more helpful guide to rich/lean than measuring O2. HC plus high O2 is a characteristic of misfire. |
#130
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Try a different accel. cam. Needs to have a longer ramp so it will spread the shot out until the RPM's of the engine can catch up to the squirter. (or change position of the cam)
__________________
John Wallace - johnta1 Pontiac Power RULES !!! www.wallaceracing.com Winner of Top Class at Pontiac Nationals, 2004 Cordova Winner of Quick 16 At Ames 2004 Pontiac Tripower Nats KRE's MR-1 - 1st 5 second Pontiac block ever! "Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts." "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid." – Socrates |
#131
|
||||
|
||||
Since it wasn't mentioned, keep in mind when getting into squirters that big you really need the hollow screw. The channel through the body is only so big, so when the squirter reaches a certain size, around .035 or so, it's really not accomplishing much to go any bigger unless the hollow screw is installed.
I find pump cams affecting intensity and duration to have as much or more affect than just squirter changes alone. Personally I haven't had an engine I couldn't tune with just using the pink squirter in the #1 position on various style intake manifolds. Just as big of a player is initial timing, how much you have, and how fast it ramps in off idle. Vacuum advance is another big player. Just some ideas if not already mentioned. |
#132
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
It seems like what I’m seeing is the pump shot not being able to keep up with the RPMs of the engine, rather than the other way around, no? If the RPMs were not able to keep up with the pump shot, it would cause a rich condition right?
__________________
1976 Trans Am Buccaneer Red 468ci, 10.5:1 CR, 87 CC RPM CNC e-heads, HR 282/288, 230/236, 561/.573 lift, Johnson Lifters & HS 1.65 Rockers |
#133
|
||||
|
||||
The pump shot is only there to cover up the hole you make when the throttle blades open. After that they have nothing to do with the fuel curve once that shot burns off.
So if I'm reading your statement correctly, and you're having a lean condition as RPM rises, after your initial pump shot, then you probably need to look at your transition circuits. |
#134
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks Formulajones, all good points. I do have the hollow screw. For timing, right now I have 17 initial, 21 mechanical, and about 9 vacuum on manifold. Advance starts around 1100-1200 and all in by 3000. Have tried different initial settings and ported vacuum (although not extensively).
Quote:
And before anyone says it, I have squared the transfer slots, etc. Carb is very sensitive to throttle blade position. Right now primary t-slot is square at .020” and secondary blade is at the very bottom of the slot with barely a sliver showing. I have tried all configurations and that seems to work best.
__________________
1976 Trans Am Buccaneer Red 468ci, 10.5:1 CR, 87 CC RPM CNC e-heads, HR 282/288, 230/236, 561/.573 lift, Johnson Lifters & HS 1.65 Rockers |
#135
|
||||
|
||||
Where are you located Brentco?
|
#136
|
|||
|
|||
You’ll probably eventually get rid of the lean spot by dumping tons of fuel, but a better way to go is find a vacuum secondary carb when running on the street. Just my experience/2 cents.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
1979 Firebird Trans Am 301/4spd (Now 428) 1977 Firebird Formula 400/Auto 2007 Grand Prix GXP 5.3L |
#137
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
You are 100% correct though that the transfer slot seems to be a major player. It’s strange how much of an effect that has on WOT, but that certainly seems to be the case. I’ve tried different IFR and IAB sizes, and have gotten to a point where now the lean spike only happens with a very quick stab to WOT. But I’m fighting the balance between that and an overly rich cruise. I’ve gone down from the .035 stock IFR to a .031 (in the lower position), and now I’m back up to a .033. The .033 basically eliminated the lean spike everywhere but stab to WOT. Now, however, my freeway cruise AFR is back down to high 11s. I suppose I could live with that if it got my WOT to the right place, but I can’t really live with both a rich cruise and a bog launching to WOT.
__________________
1976 Trans Am Buccaneer Red 468ci, 10.5:1 CR, 87 CC RPM CNC e-heads, HR 282/288, 230/236, 561/.573 lift, Johnson Lifters & HS 1.65 Rockers |
#138
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
1976 Trans Am Buccaneer Red 468ci, 10.5:1 CR, 87 CC RPM CNC e-heads, HR 282/288, 230/236, 561/.573 lift, Johnson Lifters & HS 1.65 Rockers |
#139
|
||||
|
||||
This was kind of buried in my description, but it is a vacuum secondary carb (and that’s one of the reasons I got a vac sec in the first place, supposed to be more tunable for the street).
__________________
1976 Trans Am Buccaneer Red 468ci, 10.5:1 CR, 87 CC RPM CNC e-heads, HR 282/288, 230/236, 561/.573 lift, Johnson Lifters & HS 1.65 Rockers |
#140
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
No spacer — just a plate, maybe 1/8” thick, to provide clearance for the 50cc pump arm.
__________________
1976 Trans Am Buccaneer Red 468ci, 10.5:1 CR, 87 CC RPM CNC e-heads, HR 282/288, 230/236, 561/.573 lift, Johnson Lifters & HS 1.65 Rockers |
Reply |
|
|