FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Comparing Starter 1107355 versus 1108353
Curious if anyone knows the main difference between the 2 starters other than the 1108353 is a RAIII.
I need something to replace my missing 1108353 starter and don’t think I’m finding one so thought about a standard 1107353 and wanted to know main differences and if there is any issues running a 335 on a RAIII motor. Car is a 69 Judge |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Thise starters have been high for a few years now. No different than the 4500 273 carb that everyone needs too.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Yea, I’ve seen that. I’m more curious as to what the differences are. Is there a problem using the 355 starter?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
All 3 are high torque so it would probably work fine.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
looks like the 335 isn't up there anymore so both are high torque
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Yes Don, that’s why that 273 is still on my wanted list. LOL, I don’t even see them that much anymore. One of these days...
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Since they are both high torque then I would assume the RAIII has a higher torque value than a standard.
Money is a secondary issue to deal with, finding a correctly or close dated 69 8353 is the first hurdle, never seen a 69 for sale yet. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Yea, any Good condition PMD Hi-TQ Starter is going to play very well with your 400.
I have an unstamped GM Hi-TQ starter (of that era) laying around. DROOL. Gimmie big bucks. That is why i have little respect for stampings adding value to Production parts. Carbs, Dizzys, Starters. MOTORs repair manual dated 1970 has a very fine list of PMD Starter Stampings, and their Specs. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|