Pontiac - Boost Turbo, supercharged, Nitrous, EFI & other Power Adders discussed here.

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-06-2017, 10:16 PM
charlie66's Avatar
charlie66 charlie66 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,266
Default Torker intake Question

I'm modifying a Torker intake to make the 4 front runners wider, and while im in there im going to even out the stepped floor. So my question is do I go with the lower floor or the upper floor level? Its for a boosted engine. Originally I was going to lower the floor for more plenum size and port size , but then I started looking at the whole picture and the lower floor/runners go so flat from the plenum to the head flange where the higher floor/runners are high and have a nice pitch / slope downward to the flange . To me it seems the lower runners kind of fall off like a cliff as the air enters the head port, where the higher ones look like the air will enter in a more smoother flowing manner. Also if it was higher would it have better velocity and throttle manners?

Thanks ...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20171206_172213088.jpg
Views:	146
Size:	56.5 KB
ID:	469562   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20171206_164235740.jpg
Views:	138
Size:	110.9 KB
ID:	469563   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20171206_164036614.jpg
Views:	148
Size:	70.0 KB
ID:	469564   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20171206_164311146.jpg
Views:	147
Size:	81.1 KB
ID:	469565   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20171206_172148474.jpg
Views:	123
Size:	68.6 KB
ID:	469566  


__________________
My Half AN Injun.....
  #2  
Old 12-09-2017, 11:48 PM
charlie66's Avatar
charlie66 charlie66 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,266
Default

So I decided to raise the front floor to the same level as the back because it was less work. Being its going to be used for boost I don't think 5/8 of a inch will really matter. So far I made the front runners and hot glued it together for mock up.. Next is the back ones and then to finish with the floor.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20171207_134850136.jpg
Views:	120
Size:	74.9 KB
ID:	469757   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20171207_113112565.jpg
Views:	138
Size:	158.9 KB
ID:	469758   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20171209_220555323.jpg
Views:	121
Size:	125.0 KB
ID:	469759   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20171209_215558740.jpg
Views:	118
Size:	93.0 KB
ID:	469760   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20171209_220544766.jpg
Views:	131
Size:	126.0 KB
ID:	469761  


__________________
My Half AN Injun.....
  #3  
Old 12-10-2017, 12:00 AM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,303
Default

Give you a lot of credit Charlie, removing the poor runners and making your own runners to match the rear ones is a job, but possibly less actual work vs doing a split manifold. (two Rear sections like I did.)

Tom V.

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #4  
Old 12-10-2017, 12:46 AM
charlie66's Avatar
charlie66 charlie66 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,266
Default

Thanks Tom.

There was a moment where I stepped back and looked at this gutted what used to be Torker manifold and said to myself what have I done there's no coming back from this one.. haha. But then I just went with my thoughts and let it unfold .. Now it seems like no big deal. I have a good idea for the rest of them already. The hardest part was shaping the runner wall and twisting it to go parallel with the divider .. I had to make up a tool to do it.. I got a nice chunk of 1/2 aluminum for the floor. I'm going to try and pitch the floor to each runner with the center at a flat peak...

__________________
My Half AN Injun.....
  #5  
Old 12-10-2017, 08:22 AM
taff2's Avatar
taff2 taff2 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: South Wales in UK.
Posts: 2,172
Default

Is there a particular reason you are modding a Torker 1 rather than using a better manifold such as a Victor?

  #6  
Old 12-10-2017, 11:01 AM
charlie66's Avatar
charlie66 charlie66 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,266
Default

Hood clearance mainly . 2 1/4 inch difference.. I need hood clearance . I'm not chopping a 1964 got hood...

I've owned this manifold since I was 22 . Used to run it on a 389 that ran low 12's . I guess im a little attached to it too. haha. I probably could of got something like a Holley street Dominator or something like that but I don't see why I cant make this one work. All you really have to do is get boost into it an keep turning the knob till your happy right.. Im actually having fun doing this anyway. I like the challenge.. I have all winter ..

I guess you're not a fan of this one?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20171208_140938947.jpg
Views:	107
Size:	77.3 KB
ID:	469789   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20171208_140813121.jpg
Views:	130
Size:	75.5 KB
ID:	469790  

__________________
My Half AN Injun.....
  #7  
Old 12-10-2017, 11:29 AM
charlie66's Avatar
charlie66 charlie66 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,266
Default

One thing I noticed about this particular Torker , not saying all Torkers are this way, but this one the driver side back runners are 1/8 wider half way down heading towards the plenum. That might just explain why number 5 and 7 plugs were always a little learner then then 6 and 8.. Idk I could be wrong , but I don't think so....

__________________
My Half AN Injun.....
  #8  
Old 12-10-2017, 11:36 AM
charlie66's Avatar
charlie66 charlie66 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Vaught View Post
Give you a lot of credit Charlie, removing the poor runners and making your own runners to match the rear ones is a job, but possibly less actual work vs doing a split manifold. (two Rear sections like I did.)

Tom V.
Getting another manifold and matting both back half's together would of been a better way of making this one more uniform but I didn't have another and thought it would be cool to keep the front area between the runners and water crossover looking the same as original ...

I would luv to see a picture of the one you did....

__________________
My Half AN Injun.....
  #9  
Old 12-10-2017, 12:06 PM
n2ogpsj462's Avatar
n2ogpsj462 n2ogpsj462 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ambler, PA
Posts: 943
Default

Ditching the 4cyl or just a stay busy project?

__________________
71 grand prix SJ 4280# 462 new for 2008 -
8.7:1 , 98cc 6Xs 246/209, 342 12bolt , BW S475 turbo JGS 50mm WG 56mm BOV. 600hp the easy way!
  #10  
Old 12-10-2017, 12:06 PM
charlie66's Avatar
charlie66 charlie66 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by taff2 View Post
Is there a particular reason you are modding a Torker 1 rather than using a better manifold such as a Victor?
I also like one off things that no one else has..

__________________
My Half AN Injun.....
  #11  
Old 12-10-2017, 12:18 PM
JSPONT's Avatar
JSPONT JSPONT is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: ROCKY POINT NY
Posts: 2,917
Default

I have a home for that victor if you are not using it! LOL
Nice job Charlie, you are motivated for sure.

You make headers yet??

  #12  
Old 12-10-2017, 01:20 PM
charlie66's Avatar
charlie66 charlie66 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by n2ogpsj462 View Post
Ditching the 4cyl or just a stay busy project?
Man that is a loaded question. haha

I'm not but I am. I know that makes no sense.

The 4 cylinder is like having a bipolar girlfriend its very unpredictable . Its happy one second and the next millisecond its not. I like it most of the time because its got cool factor and it gets tons of attention no matter where I bring it , the car is basically like a movie star, im not kidding everyone piles around it to look at the motor as soon as I pull in to any local car show.. .it has a reputation around here for more then one reason . But at the same time I can't afford to build it the way it needs to be built for the power level I want It to live at. If I get a crank made for the 4500- 5000 dollar's Moldex wants to build one for, a big question comes to mind that stops me quick. What will be the next weak link. In my mind its the block . I had a chance back when I started building it to buy a Super Duty block (very rare) but didn't because the guy wanted 1400 just for the block. so I went with the other block he had for 400. At the time it seemed like the better choice because I didn't know where I was going with this and how successful I would be at actually getting it built. there's not a lot of parts out there for it . So I called Nunzi and told him about it . In an earlier conversation I had with him prior to this one he assured me I would never find one , boy was that far from the truth for me. He didn't believe me at first because of the rarity of the block . But after the guy Andy that had it called him he bought it for 1000 bucks . It kills me every time I think about not buying that block. If I had the block I would get the crank made and have a 1000 hp 4 cylinder all day long .. An to rub it in more the machinist that did Nunzi's block did mine. He told me that that block was so hard to bore because of the high nickel content it had. He said he was afraid it was going to break the boring bit it was so hard when boring... he said mine cut like butter. Anyway right now the cam is out and back for the third time to the guy that made it because one of the lobes keeps going bad. Just like a pimple something keeps erupting from underneath , it seems there was a defect in the core . So when he gets back from the PRI show he's going to evaluate it and tell me what he's going to do. So there you got a short history of what its like doing a 4 cylinder. Its just hot and cold all the time.. So yeah im building a 8 cylinder for the future because of the rocky road I've had so far. It will make the same power at 12 psi then dealing with 38 psi and do it reliably .. Sorry for the long answer, you just got me thinking....

__________________
My Half AN Injun.....
  #13  
Old 12-10-2017, 01:28 PM
charlie66's Avatar
charlie66 charlie66 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JSPONT View Post
I have a home for that victor if you are not using it! LOL
Nice job Charlie, you are motivated for sure.

You make headers yet??
I told you last year I wanted to trade you for your warrior but you sold it..

No , but I have a good idea thanks to Tom V and Taff ... It will eventually all get done..

I'm only one poor bastard with too much time on his hands .... Lol

__________________
My Half AN Injun.....
  #14  
Old 12-10-2017, 02:16 PM
n2ogpsj462's Avatar
n2ogpsj462 n2ogpsj462 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ambler, PA
Posts: 943
Default

It does make sense especially for reliability. What cubic inch? If I were to start over I think I'd do a 3" main 440.

__________________
71 grand prix SJ 4280# 462 new for 2008 -
8.7:1 , 98cc 6Xs 246/209, 342 12bolt , BW S475 turbo JGS 50mm WG 56mm BOV. 600hp the easy way!
  #15  
Old 12-10-2017, 02:46 PM
JSPONT's Avatar
JSPONT JSPONT is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: ROCKY POINT NY
Posts: 2,917
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by charlie66 View Post
I told you last year I wanted to trade you for your warrior but you sold it..

No , but I have a good idea thanks to Tom V and Taff ... It will eventually all get done..

I'm only one poor bastard with too much time on his hands .... Lol
I'm a poor bastard with NO time on my hands!!

  #16  
Old 12-10-2017, 04:20 PM
charlie66's Avatar
charlie66 charlie66 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by n2ogpsj462 View Post
It does make sense especially for reliability. What cubic inch? If I were to start over I think I'd do a 3" main 440.
For me its the smallest stroke and big bore.. So with out spending a lot of money getting the stroke that id like, im stuck with a 400 .035 over with a 3.75 stroke.. it will make more power then I could ever use...

__________________
My Half AN Injun.....
  #17  
Old 12-10-2017, 04:22 PM
charlie66's Avatar
charlie66 charlie66 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JSPONT View Post
I'm a poor bastard with NO time on my hands!!
Oh believe me, I've learned that to be true....

__________________
My Half AN Injun.....
  #18  
Old 12-10-2017, 04:30 PM
charlie66's Avatar
charlie66 charlie66 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,266
Default

I redid the front runners for the third and last time now. The roof was too wide and had to squash it down some . also made a divider for the two runners . It will all blend with the weld and a grinder...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20171210_151237604.jpg
Views:	98
Size:	128.4 KB
ID:	469825   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20171210_151125330.jpg
Views:	100
Size:	112.5 KB
ID:	469826  

__________________
My Half AN Injun.....
  #19  
Old 12-10-2017, 08:19 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,303
Default

If I can get some pics of my Split back-half Torquer intake I will post them up, Charlie.

Tom V.

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #20  
Old 12-10-2017, 11:02 PM
73 TRANSAM 73 TRANSAM is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 545
Default

Charlie,
I am very impressed with your work on this intake. Keep working on it.

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:41 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017