FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Totally don't get it!
These are the type of "restorations" that I totally don't get. I just don't understand why someone would do something like this. Enlighten me?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/322001847512...7512&viewitem= |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I've never got it either. In the 90's and early 00's I parted and cut up two such early nose transformations. One of them had a popup sunroof and shag carpet on the package tray area.
__________________
Buzzards gotta eat... same as worms. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Seems simple enough to me. They like the look of the 70-73 T/A but don't want to pay $20k+ for a nice example.
Honestly, the red/orange engine paint and cheap air cleaner bother me a lot more than the bumper swap.
__________________
'73 Formula - Buccaneer Red Matching #s, Resto in progress, 350 Pontiac (For now)/Doug Nash 4+1 '86 C20 Suburban - 454/NV4500 |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
I get it, just don't like it.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Easy to put this back to a 76 nose if that's your thing. Owner is at a disadvantage as a seller in this case.
__________________
___________________________________ "Objects in mirror are closer than they appear" |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
well, my 79 T/A had that fugly nose. Some like them - I do not, especially since the transition from curvy body to square nose was kinda abrupt. The square rear bumper of the 79 did not match either, so the 70-72 rear was welded into place. If this car was a TATA or W72 I would have sold it as is, but it was a drivetrain-less 403 roller with baby blue interior.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
I agree, one more nice looking Bird on the street. And some of the later plane Jane birds were just crying for a makeover. It's nice that Pontiac kept the sheet metal consistent.
__________________
___________________________________ "Objects in mirror are closer than they appear" |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
This forum caters for the pinnacle of the classic car market. The knowledge and attention to detail you guys put into this sites content, & your cars, is frankly unbelievable, and I love it.
But the car market has different layers Lots of 'car guys' are NOT into collecting cars for their value, they just like the way a car looks or performs. As a result they don't give a stuff about originality or matching numbers. And as Cal30 sys they can own a (fake) TA and live the dream for a fraction of the cost. Of course its never going to achieve the value of an original TA, but they've invested less anyway. And outside of this 'hard core Pontiac' community, how many folks would notice the mismatched bumpers? I probably wouldn't notice similarly mismatched bumpers, or spot the 'fake' Road Runner on a classic MOPAR at a cruise night, as Im just not that interested in MOPARs Its different horses for different courses! |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
At least he didn't take a numbers matching '70 t/a and mess it up.
That would start a similar thread as to "WHY". good start to a pro-touring car project. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Not sure why but there have been a few similar ones on craigslist lately using 70,1,2 & 3 noses on later cars - one in particular was a 79. Not horrible, probably a lot of fun to drive - could abuse it without remorse.
__________________
Some guys they just give up living And start dying little by little, piece by piece, Some guys come home from work and wash up, And go racin' in the street. Bruce Springsteen - Racing In The Street - 1978 |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Some people are pragmatists. I have a friend who was an original owner of a 70 TA. He sold it in the 90s because it only had 8k miles and was afraid to drive it. I should rephrase that; he was afraid to enjoy it. So he built a car nearly identical to the eBay ad. I think it was a 75 4spd car. Built a 455, added a 70 nose, white paint and blue stripe. He was not afraid to drive it or park it anywhere. Sounds kind of liberating!
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The car here,in this thread, I just dislike the damn MSD box.. there are so many now, that someday people will think they are stock and cant run without the multiple sparks! LOL I would drive a late 70's with a 72 nose, No problems, and have fun !!
__________________
"The Future Belongs to those who are STILL Willing to get their Hands Dirty" .. my Grandfather |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
I would feel "funny" motorin' up to a Poncho show in one. But I bet the 79-81 bird owners would welcome you and hang... (OK, maybe / ).... I just take it they wish they had a real 70-73 and it is a compliment. That is the "why".... nice driver lo po 70-73 cars start at 12K so that is basement market short of projects. 79 and up, spend sub 8K on really clean TA slam nose, shoot paint on maybe just it only and one has a TA way cheaper than any 70-73 even clone, so it is I think a compliment by those that are on a budget and dig 70-73, I guess..
__________________
72 Bird |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
I get it to a point...
What I don't et, is that it appears as though the guy cheaped out at the last minute - I mean, I get that somoene likes the looks of a white 70-72 car, but why cheap out on the stripes/decals? The car could have been painted in virtually any colour combination used between 1973 & 1977 and used the corresponding bird & decals. The car would look best IMHO if the car was done up with a bird in 73-77 fashion, or would look better if the tail lamps had white frames, and the decals/stripes were correct for a 70-72 car. But that's just my two cents
__________________
1970 Formula 400 Carousel Red paint on Black standard interior A no-engine, no-transmission, no-wheel option car. Quite likely one of few '70 Muncie three speed Formula 400's left. 1991 Grand Am: 14.4 @ 93.7mph (DA corrected) (retired DD, stock appearing) 2009 Cobalt SS: 13.9 @ 103mph (current DD; makes something north of 300hp & 350ft/lbs) |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Saw my "fatasy car" at a show last summer. That is a car that when 17, would have been the pinnacle of my teenage experience.
77 T/A, Candy apple red, big flairs, big tires, Side pipes etc., etc. I just shook my head & smiled. Kinda like a 50 year old gal today with Farrah hair! |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
So 79-81 guys are less serious about there birds than early bird owners? That's funny. Sub 8k on a real clean TA? Funny again. Any clean TA is no longer in that price range. Personally, either go all the way Pro -Touring or don't mod at all because if you do mod to this extent, it just looks hacked and unfinished. I look at cars like this as some little backyard flipper trying to get by as cheap as possible to make some dough off the uneducated. It's also a 76 Formula, not a TA.
__________________
1979 W72 Fire Am 1976 Fire Am Last edited by dreamn69; 02-10-2016 at 01:35 PM. |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
I'd rather go without a Firebird... then buy something like that.. Sorry... but I'd be embarrassed to own/drive something like that..
__________________
Current Pontiacs - 1973 Formula SD455 - #'s auto orig paint 1972 Trans Am - 4 speed orig paint 1974 Formula 400 - Ram Air automatic 1966 2+2 convertible - 421 4bbl automatic 1967 Grand Prix - 4 speed orig paint 1967 GTO - 4 speed orig paint 35k orig miles |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I'd just get rid of the tacky/cheap stripe job, and decal it up with a blue bird, and corresponding "Trans Am" script decals. I get that people prefer the bumperless look that the 70-73's have, but like I said earlier, it looks like the guy who did it cheaped out at the last minute; To that effect, I think it would have ended up looking nicer with NO stripes or decals, than the way it was done.
__________________
1970 Formula 400 Carousel Red paint on Black standard interior A no-engine, no-transmission, no-wheel option car. Quite likely one of few '70 Muncie three speed Formula 400's left. 1991 Grand Am: 14.4 @ 93.7mph (DA corrected) (retired DD, stock appearing) 2009 Cobalt SS: 13.9 @ 103mph (current DD; makes something north of 300hp & 350ft/lbs) |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I can't go as far as some of the other folks here though. You guys are the creme-de-la-creme of the enthusiast world, most people out there just never reach that level, nor care to. As someone who has yearned after a 70-73 for years, and is finally able to afford one only by doing nearly 100% of the restoration work myself, I can see how the early cars appeal to enthusiasts who will never be able to afford them. How many of you got into these cars when you were a bit younger before the Barrett Jackson and rotisserie restoration craze, when you could get a NICE well optioned car for 4-6k? Would you be willing to go back to the same point in your life and spend 20-30k on the same car? The ridiculously elevated price of this hobby in the last decade is making it near impossible for the average enthusiast to get their foot into the door with anything respectable (without going into massive amounts of debt at least). The more astronomical the prices go, the more clones we see. I don't see that trend reversing anytime soon. I think most of your Chebby, Ford, MOPAR, Olds, and Buick guys at a show or cruise-in wouldn't even notice the difference on this car, at least at first glance. That being said, the owner probably achieved what he was looking for at a discount price. I'm sure he wouldn't be happier driving around a rusty V6 Espirit. I certainly wouldn't.
__________________
'73 Formula - Buccaneer Red Matching #s, Resto in progress, 350 Pontiac (For now)/Doug Nash 4+1 '86 C20 Suburban - 454/NV4500 |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
I love my chrome rear bumper but think the 76-78 rear bumper matches well with the 70-73 nose. I would have painted the car Lucy blue with the right decal stripes, made the shaker correct and put a Pontiac color on the motor. As others have said that car can be driven like you stole it.
__________________
73 T/A 455, 4speed |
Reply |
|
|