Suspension TECH Including Brakes, Wheels and tires

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-20-2020, 12:16 AM
ZeGermanHam's Avatar
ZeGermanHam ZeGermanHam is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,927
Default Poly bushings worth it for the diff/axle?

Hi all,

I'm getting ready to bolt on all of my new suspension and rear end parts to my freshly refurbished '66 GTO frame. I'm installing a new Quick Performance 9" rear axle which came with rubber upper control arm bushings preinstalled.

However, my UMI State 3 suspension kit also came with polyurethane bushings for the diff. I'm debating on whether it's worth the trouble of pressing out the rubber bushings and installing the poly bushings.

The rest of the rear control arm bushings are a combination of polyurethane and spherical "roto" joints. The car is being built to handle like a more modern car, but won't be used for autocross. It'll be on 15" steelies with 235/60R15 tires.

Are the rear upper control arm diff bushings a game changer, or are they less impactful than other areas? Thanks!

__________________

1966 Pontiac GTO (restoration thread)
1998 BMW 328is (track rat)
2023 Subaru Crosstrek Limited (daily)
View my photos: Caught in the Wild
  #2  
Old 03-20-2020, 12:30 AM
Scarebird's Avatar
Scarebird Scarebird is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ABQ, USA
Posts: 5,017
Default

I would stay rubber - poly binds it up too much.

I went all spherical on mine.


  #3  
Old 03-20-2020, 09:27 AM
leeklm's Avatar
leeklm leeklm is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Mpls, MN
Posts: 1,747
Default

As mentioned, the rubber should be fine. I used the roto joints with adjustable uppers on my 66 and really liked them . Along with reinforced stock lower arms with poly bushings you could do burnouts all day long with no wheel hop whatsoever.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

__________________
68 Firebird-- Street/Strip - 400/461 Eagle Forged Bottom End & Ross Flat top pistons. KRE 325 CFM D port, Ultradyne 263/271 @.050, .4267 lift. Crower Solid roller lifters and 1.65 stainless rockers. Quickfuel 1000 on Torker2 intake and 2" open spacer. Hedman 1.75" headers. TH400 w/brake. Ford 9" w/3.80 gears & 28x9 Hoosier pro bracket drag radial. Best ET: 1.35 60ft, 6.29 @ 107.20 mph, 9.99 @132.33 mph. 3,300 race weight
  #4  
Old 03-20-2020, 11:45 AM
ZeGermanHam's Avatar
ZeGermanHam ZeGermanHam is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,927
Default

Thanks Scarebird and leeklm. Sounds like I'm unlikely to experience any significant drawbacks to sticking with rubber bushings on the diff. I suppose if for some reason they aren't working out, it's easy enough for me to swap them out for the poly bushings down the road.

__________________

1966 Pontiac GTO (restoration thread)
1998 BMW 328is (track rat)
2023 Subaru Crosstrek Limited (daily)
View my photos: Caught in the Wild
  #5  
Old 03-28-2020, 01:36 AM
jarretts70 jarretts70 is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 446
Default

scarebird, did you fit spherical bushings to the original arms? what bushings did you use?

  #6  
Old 03-28-2020, 12:57 PM
pokey1 pokey1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 229
Default

going with HR parts and stuff bushings. They are poly but have grease zerks and are grease able so they do not bind or squeak. The stock ones that came in my quick performance rear were really soft so switching.

__________________
1967 GTO, 467 roller motor, e heads ported, tremec T56 magnum 6 speed and
9" done. EZ EFI 2.0 with FAST dual sync distributor and separate nitrous system done. Track is at 4300 ft elevation. so far a best of 11.95@116. Suspension now getting dialed in...tubular front a arms with dual adjustable coil overs HR Parts n stuff rear bar and whole car lowered 3 inches..
  #7  
Old 03-28-2020, 02:25 PM
Scarebird's Avatar
Scarebird Scarebird is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ABQ, USA
Posts: 5,017
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jarretts70 View Post
scarebird, did you fit spherical bushings to the original arms? what bushings did you use?
I used Speedway's Metric 1973-88 bushings. I had to make end spacers for them.


  #8  
Old 03-29-2020, 09:21 AM
jarretts70 jarretts70 is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 446
Default

Scarebird - So you turned the spacers in a lathe? I like your setup. Good way to take advantage of the not so expensive speedway bushings. I don't have a lathe...dang.

I've got a set or ridetech adjustable upper arms on order. I went with them simply because I could get a good price thru a local shop that is a dealer. They use a spherical bushing @ the frame end. My plan was to find another spherical bushing to use in the axle end of the lower arms. Then use poly in the rear upper location (the ones pressed into the axle). and also the front lower. I figure the mix of spheres & poly should firm things up & still have reasonable articulation.

  #9  
Old 03-29-2020, 10:23 AM
Scarebird's Avatar
Scarebird Scarebird is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ABQ, USA
Posts: 5,017
Default

I hope it works for you - I have noted from experts that poly won't swivel like rubber or spherical, your feedback would be quite valuable.

  #10  
Old 03-30-2020, 12:35 AM
pokey1 pokey1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 229
Default

Here are the new poly bushings I put in..
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4929.jpg
Views:	117
Size:	45.7 KB
ID:	535759   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4930.jpg
Views:	110
Size:	50.5 KB
ID:	535760  

__________________
1967 GTO, 467 roller motor, e heads ported, tremec T56 magnum 6 speed and
9" done. EZ EFI 2.0 with FAST dual sync distributor and separate nitrous system done. Track is at 4300 ft elevation. so far a best of 11.95@116. Suspension now getting dialed in...tubular front a arms with dual adjustable coil overs HR Parts n stuff rear bar and whole car lowered 3 inches..
  #11  
Old 03-30-2020, 12:53 AM
ZeGermanHam's Avatar
ZeGermanHam ZeGermanHam is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,927
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pokey1 View Post
going with HR parts and stuff bushings. They are poly but have grease zerks and are grease able so they do not bind or squeak. The stock ones that came in my quick performance rear were really soft so switching.
What were the symptoms you experienced that caused you to feel the bushings in your QP rear end were too soft?

__________________

1966 Pontiac GTO (restoration thread)
1998 BMW 328is (track rat)
2023 Subaru Crosstrek Limited (daily)
View my photos: Caught in the Wild
  #12  
Old 03-30-2020, 10:37 AM
pokey1 pokey1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 229
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeGermanHam View Post
What were the symptoms you experienced that caused you to feel the bushings in your QP rear end were too soft?
None at this time. I have had the old Lakewood ladder bars on the car since 1978. The car has always sat pretty high in the front and back. In about 1998 I was going thru the car again and had the ladder bars off and decided to try running without them. On the street in front of my house I dumped the clutch and the car started to hop severely and before I could get the clutch back in it sheared the teeth off of 1st gear on the main cluster and the countershaft. Put ladder bars back on and never had the problem again. The ladder bars make everything really stiff and the way it was set up there was now way I could get the correct weight transfer I wanted. When I put the quick performance rear end in I put Adjustable coil over shocks on so I would be able to lower the height. I have now put the coil overs on the front and went to lower the car but the ladder bars would not let the back go down. Ca really get no adjustment the way they are set up. Si I decided it is time for them to go and now trying HRpartsnstuff sway bar. While under the car I could see that just sitting the upper trailing arms on the diff were really squishing out already and was told that is typical because of how soft they are. I order to keep consistent driveline angles when dropping the clutch It made sense to me to make the rest of the suspension components more rigid so that why I decided to try this. Car is now down about 3 inches all around from the picture. Haven't had a chance to try it yet.

__________________
1967 GTO, 467 roller motor, e heads ported, tremec T56 magnum 6 speed and
9" done. EZ EFI 2.0 with FAST dual sync distributor and separate nitrous system done. Track is at 4300 ft elevation. so far a best of 11.95@116. Suspension now getting dialed in...tubular front a arms with dual adjustable coil overs HR Parts n stuff rear bar and whole car lowered 3 inches..
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:24 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017