#1  
Old 10-17-2024, 02:10 AM
blackadder blackadder is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 128
Default A body frames

Was wondering what years and models of GM A body frames fit a 65 GTO?

  #2  
Old 10-17-2024, 10:01 AM
'ol Pinion head 'ol Pinion head is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: INJUN Territory, Red State Merica!
Posts: 9,697
Default

'64-67 GM A-body frames are all 116" wheelbase. 2 door or 4 door.

'64-67 Pontiac & Buick A-body frames will bolt in, with the qualification that all '67 A-body frames having a differently stamped rear coil spring pockets in the crossmember.

'64-65 Olds A-body frames will also work. For '66 models, Olds Cutlasses & 442's went to a cross flow radiator & that required a change to wider front frame horns, thus making the '66 & 67 Olds A-body frames year specific for Olds A-body's.

For a serious restoration, I would search out for a '65 or '66 frame & note the front of the front (engine mount) crossmember area. The '64 Pontiac & Olds A-body frames I've removed from partscars had a different shaped area at the front center of front frame crossmember than the '65 & 66 A-body frames that I have had (& possibly have in the frame stacks). The feature Im remembering was an open triangular shape at the front versus the "shoe horn" shape. If total correctness is very important, thre are noted serious '64 & 65 restorer/collectors here on the board that could confirm that feature.

__________________
Buzzards gotta eat... same as worms.
  #3  
Old 10-17-2024, 11:21 AM
b-man's Avatar
b-man b-man is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sunny So Cal
Posts: 17,152
Default

I know you meant 115” wheelbase.

__________________
1964 Tempest Coupe LS3/4L70E/3.42
1964 Le Mans Convertible 421 HO/TH350/2.56
2002 WS6 Convertible LS1/4L60E/3.23
  #4  
Old 10-17-2024, 11:43 AM
hgerhardt's Avatar
hgerhardt hgerhardt is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: CA
Posts: 667
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 'ol Pinion head View Post
....... & note the front of the front (engine mount) crossmember area........ The feature Im remembering was an open triangular shape at the front versus the "shoe horn" shape. ........
Seems I remember from way back that various Fisher Body plants did that triangular frame horn differently. Some had the integral formed triangle and some had the triangle as a separate piece made from bent plate stock and welded on.

Of course it depends which year(s) that discrepancy happened, and I don't remember that. Worth checking if you're building a concours car.

  #5  
Old 10-17-2024, 12:29 PM
6d7gto 6d7gto is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,381
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hgerhardt View Post
Seems I remember from way back that various Fisher Body plants did that triangular frame horn differently. Some had the integral formed triangle and some had the triangle as a separate piece made from bent plate stock and welded on.

Of course it depends which year(s) that discrepancy happened, and I don't remember that. Worth checking if you're building a concours car.
That said, not sure about 1965...but I do know that 1967 had 3 different frame builders. All 3 manufacturers (Pontiac, AO Smith and Parrish) had differences in them; which might account for the different shoe horn configurations? Pretty sure the vehicle build plant locations utilized different frame manufacturers...probably using the closest to them for shipping purposes.


Last edited by 6d7gto; 10-17-2024 at 12:34 PM.
  #6  
Old 10-17-2024, 02:59 PM
'ol Pinion head 'ol Pinion head is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: INJUN Territory, Red State Merica!
Posts: 9,697
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by b-man View Post
I know you meant 115” wheelbase.
Yes, 115" WB.

__________________
Buzzards gotta eat... same as worms.
  #7  
Old 10-17-2024, 03:05 PM
'ol Pinion head 'ol Pinion head is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: INJUN Territory, Red State Merica!
Posts: 9,697
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6d7gto View Post
That said, not sure about 1965...but I do know that 1967 had 3 different frame builders. All 3 manufacturers (Pontiac, AO Smith and Parrish) had differences in them; which might account for the different shoe horn configurations? Pretty sure the vehicle build plant locations utilized different frame manufacturers...probably using the closest to them for shipping purposes.
Agree several different frame mfg'ers may have supplied in '64 & '65 model years. Will start examining the lh frame legs & front frame crossmember areas in several friends very original '64 & 65 GTO's. On the A-body frame plants, believe they were all located in the upper Midwest.

__________________
Buzzards gotta eat... same as worms.
  #8  
Old 10-17-2024, 04:46 PM
blackadder blackadder is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 128
Default

Was looking at a 67 Skylark convt frame as a replacement if needed. Would it have the factory stiffeners installed being a convt frame. My 65 is a post car.

  #9  
Old 10-17-2024, 05:06 PM
'ol Pinion head 'ol Pinion head is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: INJUN Territory, Red State Merica!
Posts: 9,697
Default

The '67 Skylark convert frame is exact same application as '67 Tempest/LeMans/GTO. uses the '67 style rear springs due to the different stamped big crossmember. Substituting a boxed convert frame in a car that at originally had an open side rail type frame, you'll want to go with a main fuel line & brake line for that boxed (convert style) frame. The other things to note is if your '65 is a 3spd or 4spd car, you 'll want to take measurements of where the welded on tab is on the front drivers side for the Z-bar. These were welded on through '67 models, & you'd need to weld the tab onto the previously automatic A-body frame. Will also need the transmission crossmember for the boxed (convert) frame.

__________________
Buzzards gotta eat... same as worms.
The Following User Says Thank You to 'ol Pinion head For This Useful Post:
  #10  
Old 10-17-2024, 06:33 PM
blackadder blackadder is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 128
Default

All great information. Thanks alot. Just asking due to pulling the frame on the GTO soon and wanted a back up plan if its in rough shape.

  #11  
Old 10-17-2024, 06:50 PM
gokitty gokitty is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Rougemont,NC
Posts: 55
Default

Interesting factoid: ALL 1967 Buick GS 400's had a boxed frame...hardtop,sports coupe &convertible

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:22 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017