FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
The Body Shop TECH General questions that don't fit in any other forum |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
A body frames
Was wondering what years and models of GM A body frames fit a 65 GTO?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
'64-67 GM A-body frames are all 116" wheelbase. 2 door or 4 door.
'64-67 Pontiac & Buick A-body frames will bolt in, with the qualification that all '67 A-body frames having a differently stamped rear coil spring pockets in the crossmember. '64-65 Olds A-body frames will also work. For '66 models, Olds Cutlasses & 442's went to a cross flow radiator & that required a change to wider front frame horns, thus making the '66 & 67 Olds A-body frames year specific for Olds A-body's. For a serious restoration, I would search out for a '65 or '66 frame & note the front of the front (engine mount) crossmember area. The '64 Pontiac & Olds A-body frames I've removed from partscars had a different shaped area at the front center of front frame crossmember than the '65 & 66 A-body frames that I have had (& possibly have in the frame stacks). The feature Im remembering was an open triangular shape at the front versus the "shoe horn" shape. If total correctness is very important, thre are noted serious '64 & 65 restorer/collectors here on the board that could confirm that feature.
__________________
Buzzards gotta eat... same as worms. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I know you meant 115” wheelbase.
__________________
1964 Tempest Coupe LS3/4L70E/3.42 1964 Le Mans Convertible 421 HO/TH350/2.56 2002 WS6 Convertible LS1/4L60E/3.23 |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Of course it depends which year(s) that discrepancy happened, and I don't remember that. Worth checking if you're building a concours car. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Last edited by 6d7gto; 10-17-2024 at 12:34 PM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
__________________
Buzzards gotta eat... same as worms. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Buzzards gotta eat... same as worms. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Was looking at a 67 Skylark convt frame as a replacement if needed. Would it have the factory stiffeners installed being a convt frame. My 65 is a post car.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
The '67 Skylark convert frame is exact same application as '67 Tempest/LeMans/GTO. uses the '67 style rear springs due to the different stamped big crossmember. Substituting a boxed convert frame in a car that at originally had an open side rail type frame, you'll want to go with a main fuel line & brake line for that boxed (convert style) frame. The other things to note is if your '65 is a 3spd or 4spd car, you 'll want to take measurements of where the welded on tab is on the front drivers side for the Z-bar. These were welded on through '67 models, & you'd need to weld the tab onto the previously automatic A-body frame. Will also need the transmission crossmember for the boxed (convert) frame.
__________________
Buzzards gotta eat... same as worms. |
The Following User Says Thank You to 'ol Pinion head For This Useful Post: | ||
#10
|
|||
|
|||
All great information. Thanks alot. Just asking due to pulling the frame on the GTO soon and wanted a back up plan if its in rough shape.
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting factoid: ALL 1967 Buick GS 400's had a boxed frame...hardtop,sports coupe &convertible
|
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|