Exhaust TECH Mufflers, Headers and Pipes Issues

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-12-2004, 07:29 PM
OneMeanGTO OneMeanGTO is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 14
Default

Hey Folks,
I'm restoring a 66 gto hardtop.. Motor is stock 389 with tri-power and M-20 tranny. Looking at maybe using ram air manifolds..worth using them or not? not sure if will go with stock 2.25 collectors or 2.45.. Is it worth going bigger or am i just wasting my money.. what size pipes would you recomended also? should i stay away from flow masterS? heard dynamax ultra flows are good.. thanks

  #2  
Old 03-12-2004, 07:29 PM
OneMeanGTO OneMeanGTO is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 14
Default

Hey Folks,
I'm restoring a 66 gto hardtop.. Motor is stock 389 with tri-power and M-20 tranny. Looking at maybe using ram air manifolds..worth using them or not? not sure if will go with stock 2.25 collectors or 2.45.. Is it worth going bigger or am i just wasting my money.. what size pipes would you recomended also? should i stay away from flow masterS? heard dynamax ultra flows are good.. thanks

  #3  
Old 03-12-2004, 09:36 PM
wheelspin's Avatar
wheelspin wheelspin is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hacienda Hts., SoCal
Posts: 4,345
Default

OMG,

For your stock 389, I don't think you could tell the difference between 2.5" and 2.25". However, plan for the future as reading the Forums will soon have you lusting for "more power".

My signature 66 GTO has Doug's headers, 2.5" X pipe, 2.5" 3 chamber Flows, and 2.5 full length tailpipes. My wife and I drive this car cross country to POCI and GTOAA national events and I dragrace it monthly in the Pontiac Drag Days Series. You need to decide how important "correctness" is and what your objectives for the car are.

Les

__________________
Les Iden
----------------------------
'65 Buick Sport Wagon Custom, 340, T350, 3:23
'66 GTO Post/468, 700R4, 3.31 (Mike's as of 9-16)
'68 Grand Prix/455, dual AFBs, T400, 2:93 posi (sold)
'72 TA tribute/461, T400, 3.08, (Russ's as of 9-16)
'97 Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder Turbo, Konis, 5 speed
'09 Torrent GXP, nav, Sun & Sound pkg., Bilsteins
  #4  
Old 03-13-2004, 05:37 AM
Tom Hand's Avatar
Tom Hand Tom Hand is offline
Exhaust Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Lee's Summit, MO, USA
Posts: 994
Default

If you plan to run it harder later, the larger ones are a good choice. Pipe size of 2.5" should work for a long time.

As far as mufflers, it is really up to your sound preference. With exhaust manifolds, the muffler choice is not quite as critical. The straight-through mufflers tend to allow the engine to make more power when you run it higher. UltraFlo, Xlerator, Magnaflow all will provide very similar performance with slight variations in sound. The chambered and baffled mufflers will also run about the same with the sound level usually being higher.

Chris here at PY has the CD of Muffler Sounds that will let you listen to most of the current popular mufflers before you buy them. It also will let you hear the X-crossover. You should consider putting this on now too and it will help make your muffler choice even less critical.
Tom Hand

__________________
Tom Hand
  #5  
Old 03-13-2004, 08:50 PM
Ccass's Avatar
Ccass Ccass is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Max Performance Hatfield, Pa
Posts: 4,693
Default

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by OneMeanGTO: not sure if will go with stock 2.25 collectors or 2.45.. Is it worth going bigger or am i just wasting my money thanks <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

HPP Dyno tests showed an overal gain of about 8-12 hp and only a 2hp gain by using the 2.45 manifolds vs the 2.25". Not really worth the extra in my opinion. The mandrel pipes and crossover will make the real difference.

[This message was edited by Ccass on March 17, 2004 at 06:00 PM.]

__________________
---------------------------
Fool Around, Get Hurt, Don't come Crying to me.
  #6  
Old 03-17-2004, 01:23 AM
ctrumbull ctrumbull is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 24
Default

Dude - I have the same 66 setup as you're explaining and just put on the 2.5" mandrel bent system (w/x) from PY. I wanted as original of a sound as possible, Tom and others previously recommended the Dynomax Turbo mufflers. The sound they give is mellow and very little, which is what I was going for. They let you hear the 389 humm, not some abnoxoius overly-loud muffler. Also, the x-pipe system gives a nice smooth deceleration sound/performance.

Also, I had bad luck with removing the bolts into the exhaust manifold (3 of 4 broke off). Just be careful to use lots of penetrant days and days before if they give you any resistance. Otherwise, the PY system goes on fairly straight forward.

Good luck - Chris

  #7  
Old 07-21-2004, 07:06 PM
OneMeanGTO OneMeanGTO is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 14
Default

thanks for everyones input.. looks like I'm going with 2.5 ram manifolds and 2.5 mandrel bent exhaust.. not sure what mufflers yet.. Cheers!!

  #8  
Old 07-23-2004, 11:53 AM
Astock Astock is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: S.Calif.
Posts: 65
Default

I have a brand new set of 2 1/2" R A manifolds that I just bought. I ended up going with Doug's.If your interested I'll sell them at a discount with my receipt.
Jim pocakes@email.com

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:27 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017