FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
how fast have you gone with reproduction 1967-1969 style D PORT long branches
have a decent 455 with mildly ported iron heads, xr 288 HR about 9.75:1 and stock un ground on Ames long branch manifolds estimate 425 hp
I know the car will be quicker with headers, but how much quicker? still have some bugs to iron out and have way too much gear in it w the 411s I have another pump gas e head round port 455 waiting to go in that will have dougs headers on it. I really dont know if i would swap the manifolds for headers but curious to see how fast someone else may have gone. Im guessing 3600ish weight.
__________________
1969 carousel red firebird 455, richmond 5 speed 1964 540 gto 1971 lemans sport convertible 1972 Maverick under slow construction |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I can't answer the speed question, but I talked to RARE this morning and they have left sides only in the long branch manifolds for D-port. They said 8-12 weeks out for the right sides.
I miss-read this, I see you have some in hand.
__________________
-Jason 1969 Pontiac Firebird |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
These long branch ones in this dyno test of a stock rebuild of a RA3 motor made 368 Hp, which was only a 8 Hp improvement over the standard log exh manifolds.
In a previous dyno test of a rebuilt and fine tuned RA4 motor they eked out 400 Hp, so seeing that number came in with the better flowing round port exh manifolds I don’t know how close you will really come to 425 Hp even considering the bigger cubes and Cam difference. I have a set of the GTO ones I have been meaning to get on my flow bench for years now, as that will be a true indicator of the ultimate level of hp any motor could make with them.
__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs! And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs! 1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set. Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks. 1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes. Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph. Education is what your left with once you forget things! Last edited by steve25; 05-12-2023 at 03:40 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I had long branch manifolds with 2.5 flowmaster cross flow system on my 68 Firebird. 455, similar cam, a RPM with a Thermoquad. Turbo 400, 3.31 gears with 275/60 Drag Radials. Car weighed 3660 with h me in it.
It ran 12.10 @ 114 in Kansas in summer. Sold it to a guy in Pennsylvania. He told me he was running high 11’s there. Edit, I’ve got oldtimers disease. 12.10’s was with headers & dual dyno max mufflers under the back seat foot wells. It ran 12.25 with long branch & cross flow exhaust. Had Continental tight 10 inch converter both ways. Last edited by Murf; 05-12-2023 at 04:42 PM. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Murf For This Useful Post: | ||
#5
|
||||
|
||||
That’s about what I was hoping if we sniff your results I’d be pretty happy
__________________
1969 carousel red firebird 455, richmond 5 speed 1964 540 gto 1971 lemans sport convertible 1972 Maverick under slow construction |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Not track times but an interesting dyno comparison that Mike did with the long branch manifolds:
"Now for some numbers: Best with exhaust manifolds, 464.6 Ft. Lbs @ 4700 rpm Peak HP 442.2 @ 5900 rpm. With borrowed 1 3/4 headers from a 74 GTO NHRA stocker: 18" long 3" collector, 481.6 ft. lbs torque @ 4800 rpm. 20-28 more ft. lbs. of torque everywhere. 448.4 HP @ 5800 rpm. Was not tuned to the headers, so 10-15 HP more on top could be expected. No reason to tune to headers because they are not going to be used." Eric
__________________
"Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the mouth" noted philosopher Mike Tyson Life begins at the end of your comfort zone. “The mind, once stretched by a new idea, never returns to its original dimensions.” |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Elarson For This Useful Post: | ||
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Notice my edit. Sorry about that. 😀
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Looks like with a 12.25 number that Murf was making about 340 Hp at the flywheel.
__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs! And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs! 1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set. Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks. 1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes. Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph. Education is what your left with once you forget things! |
The Following User Says Thank You to steve25 For This Useful Post: | ||
#9
|
||||
|
||||
I’m only showing about 300 at the moment
__________________
1969 carousel red firebird 455, richmond 5 speed 1964 540 gto 1971 lemans sport convertible 1972 Maverick under slow construction |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
It’s hard to be very precise with the Moroso slide calculator, and I was being a tad generous.
__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs! And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs! 1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set. Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks. 1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes. Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph. Education is what your left with once you forget things! |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Just look at the pure stock guys that have to run those manifolds. They can't port them, nor port any other aspect of the engine.
There are a couple of 69 birds using the long branch manifolds running 12's. One in particular RAIV that has been in the 11's going back several years now. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Formulajones For This Useful Post: | ||
#12
|
||||
|
||||
This is my best in my convertible. My friend has gone 11.20’s around 122 or so in his 67 FB Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dave M For This Useful Post: | ||
#13
|
||||
|
||||
What’s your compression and head flow Dave
__________________
1969 carousel red firebird 455, richmond 5 speed 1964 540 gto 1971 lemans sport convertible 1972 Maverick under slow construction |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
??? Murf’s numbers, especially the MPH.. look more like 450 HP?
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Only 9.2 and I was told flow was 240. But I have my doubts Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
My first time out with 3.08 gears and a TH400 w/13” Continental converter mine went 12.22 at 113. I’ve since upgraded to a 4L80E with a 3200 stall and 3.55 gears but haven’t been to the track. This is with a Holley Sniper EFI, full street trim and crap in the trunk. On the engine dyno with headers and a Holley HP it made 521 hp.
__________________
Will Rivera '69 Firebird 400/461, 290+ E D-Ports, HR 230/236, 4l80E, 8.5 Rear, 3.55 gears '64 LeMans 400/461, #16 Heads, HR 230/236, TKO600, 9inch Rear, 3.89 gears '69 LeMans Vert, 350, #47 heads: Non-running project |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to grivera For This Useful Post: | ||
#17
|
||||
|
||||
I’m having to shift 4 times because of the gear being a bit steep some changes coming to see if I can get it to mph again
I’m Trying to stay 52-5500 I don’t want to work on it every weekend, just wring it’s neck once in awhile it’s fun to drive
__________________
1969 carousel red firebird 455, richmond 5 speed 1964 540 gto 1971 lemans sport convertible 1972 Maverick under slow construction |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Here's the ramair II bird that put everyone on notice a dozen years ago in the stock class.
Since then there are several that run 11's in this class currently. Since you aren't competing with rules and skies the limit, you could technically compare to the FAST class, which has had one in particular max effort dip into the 9's, with the long branch manifolds. https://youtu.be/KWR0IBTtG80 |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Formulajones For This Useful Post: | ||
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Round port but yes having had a few sets of repro round port f body manifolds they are much larger Than the d port version especially in the middle of the y
I am also sure they are opened up as much as they could those things are heavy lol
__________________
1969 carousel red firebird 455, richmond 5 speed 1964 540 gto 1971 lemans sport convertible 1972 Maverick under slow construction |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
There are D port birds in the stock class using them as well. They (the 68's) typically run in the low to mid 12's. In there case the manifolds aren't limiting them, it's the rest of the D port package that limits the car (smaller cam, smaller heads etc...)
They aren't allowed to mess with them at all, no porting. So even the round port example I used above is a PS racer following the same rules but that really wouldn't apply to your question anyway, you aren't building a PS racer, you don't have rules to comply with, so we are just looking for the fastest car on stock long branch manifolds and the FAST series would also be a good place to look where porting is allowed. In fact I don't think there is a better place to look at how fast stock parts can go than the Pure Stock and Fast racing series. There's nothing else out there like it. https://www.psmcdr.com/rules#:~:text...0be%20retained. If you can get Dennis or Dan to chime in I believe he has records of fastest times. I'd be willing to bet no one has gone faster with stock manifolds than these guys. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Formulajones For This Useful Post: | ||
Reply |
|
|