FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
1108436 starter
I have a 1108436 starter for sale dated 0J8 Otober 8th 1970 needs to be rebuilt perfect for a 71 Judge or trans am or even use it as a service replacement for a 70 judge or trans am $2500
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
“J” is a September date on starters. My 1108436 has an “M” (9M23) date code which would alphabetically be the 13th month. The letter “I” was skipped on starters likely because it looks like the number “1”
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
The Following User Says Thank You to Bird_collector For This Useful Post: | ||
#3
|
|||
|
|||
This is correct
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Late built 70 raiv TA
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Also correct Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Is this still for sale?
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
If he does not have still have it available let me know. I have one that I would consider parting with. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
thanks!
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Is there a general rule for how far a 436 starter should pre-date the build date? I've heard of 73 SDs with 1B11 starters.
I have a 1B11 436 starter set aside for a car that was built in March 1972. Feb 1971 too early for a March 1972 car? Mike |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
It’s 1B1 or 1B 1 actually, and it’s fact. I’ve seen a 12k mike car, that had one and was ridiculously original. Personally I haven’t heard of any stamp dates after 1B 1 so given the low production of 72 and SD’s I’d assume 1B 1 is ok for a 72. Doubt anyone will argue it as long as the number is correct. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Starter is still for sale. 631-804-0106 Thanks Chris
|
Reply |
|
|