#41  
Old 02-17-2020, 09:50 AM
carbking's Avatar
carbking carbking is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Eldon, Missouri 65026
Posts: 3,625
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HWYSTR455 View Post
Getting a 'true' 'AFB' carb that is rebuildable is an issue tho.

If you're going 4bbl, the support, ease of tuning, and available parts of a Holley is still a better choice than going QJ, AFB, and an OE intake.


.
Everyone to their own, but have found very few AFB's that were not rebuildable. Sometimes, finding a rare specific number (i.e. 3443s) or a specific date code may be challenging, but once found, they are virtually all rebuildable.

I won't argue the availability of parts to most; but it has NEVER been a problem on Carter carbs for me.

Personally, I find the AFB's and the Q-Jets, with their metering rod technology, MUCH easier to tune than the Holleys.

By far, the biggest challenge with the AFB's has been checking each one when it came in to make certain some previous Dr. Goodpliers (the evil twin of Mr. Goodwrench) had not "married" multiple carburetors into one.

(Opinion) the AFB is absolutely the easiest 4 barrel (other than the Stromberg 4A) to rebuild that has ever been produced.

Jon.

__________________
"Good carburetion is fuelish hot air".

"The most expensive carburetor is the wrong one given to you by your neighbor".

If you truly believe that "one size fits all" try walking a mile in your spouse's shoes!

Owner of The Carburetor Shop, LLC (of Missouri).

Current caretaker of the remains of Stromberg Caburetor, and custodian of the existing Carter and Kingston carburetor drawings.
  #42  
Old 02-17-2020, 10:53 AM
HWYSTR455's Avatar
HWYSTR455 HWYSTR455 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 14,721
Default

Ok, I was too generic on the comments, admit that. The issues I had with real AFBs was the bodies became porous. I would pop the hood and the entire body would be beaded up with fuel. Granted, those were like 63-65 AFBs, but still.

Yes, I had an issue with cobbled together ones too, and that's how I ended up with a box of parts. I think at one point I even sent you a bunch of stuff (bodies, top plates, etc) Jon, like in the 90s, but don't specifically recall.

I did find them pretty easy to tune, though changing a jet would still require removal of the top plate. Not that big of a deal, but would have been nice if it could be accessed without doing so. Direct Connection sold the Strip Kits for like $30 almost forever.

My biggest issue/complaint with them was float adjustment, seems they worked well for straight-line apps, but you pitch a car into a hard turn they would spew out the vents. Some reason I could never find a good balance of float level and bowl reserve.

I recall there was a chart that showed all the jet/rod compatibility, which made it easier to avoid a rod/jet mismatch.

I ended up with some Black Stallions, which were coated bodies, and ran those through the 80s and into the 90s, which solved the porosity issue I experienced.

Holley support is much more wide-stream, which is where the comment came from, and most can get those running well, and with a little advise/testing, even better.

You go to a local cruise and ask if someone can help you with your AFB, you will get much less willing to help than if you had a Holley, same with a QJet.

I'm not a fan of the Edelbrock 'versions' of the carb, I haven't tried the new ones, but the original ones were not very friendly and IMO had issues.

.

__________________
.

1970 GTO Judge Tribute Pro-Tour Project 535 IA2
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=760624
1971 Trans Am 463, 315cfm E-head Sniper XFlow EFI, TKO600 extreme, 9", GW suspension, Baer brakes, pro tour car
https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...ght=procharger
Theme Song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zKAS...ature=youtu.be
  #43  
Old 02-17-2020, 11:57 AM
carbking's Avatar
carbking carbking is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Eldon, Missouri 65026
Posts: 3,625
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HWYSTR455 View Post

My biggest issue/complaint with them was float adjustment, seems they worked well for straight-line apps, but you pitch a car into a hard turn they would spew out the vents. Some reason I could never find a good balance of float level and bowl reserve.

.
We modified a number of AFB's for road racing (SCCA, etc.). The solution was two-fold. First, I fabricated a baffle for the primary jets similar to that on the secondary jets. This kept the primary jets covering with fuel during hard cornering.

As far as the spewing out the vents, I fabricated an overhead vent similar to that which Carter had designed for the WCFB's (think Chevy dual quad carbs) that was a tube connecting both sides, with 3 small vent holes in the top of the tubes.

These mods allowed using stock float settings.

For racing purposes, we would use the smaller floats, which allowed a larger bowl volume.

And yes, the Holleys are much easier to make go fast around corners, but the AFB's with the above mods, will as well.

Jon.

__________________
"Good carburetion is fuelish hot air".

"The most expensive carburetor is the wrong one given to you by your neighbor".

If you truly believe that "one size fits all" try walking a mile in your spouse's shoes!

Owner of The Carburetor Shop, LLC (of Missouri).

Current caretaker of the remains of Stromberg Caburetor, and custodian of the existing Carter and Kingston carburetor drawings.
  #44  
Old 02-17-2020, 03:53 PM
Sirrotica's Avatar
Sirrotica Sirrotica is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Catawba Ohio
Posts: 7,207
Default

Beside what Jon has said already, the better metering of the AFBs and Q Jets most times translate to much better metering at part throttle on a street engine Translating to better fuel mileage and the engine not running pig rich at part throttle. Many closed circuit races have been won with better fuel mileage over someone that didn't consider how important it is in the overall scheme of racing.

All my oval track cars used modified Q Jets on them so if you can't starve an oval track race car with a Q Jet, it'll work just fine on a street car.

Many NASCAR cars that came equipped with AFBs ran them on the high banks of Daytona without problems as far as fuel starvation. If it came with an AFB that's what you raced it with back in the day, when stock cars were actually stock cars. No holleys allowed unless it came with one from the factory.

__________________
Brad Yost
1973 T/A (SOLD)
2005 GTO
1984 Grand Prix

100% Pontiacs in my driveway!!! What's in your driveway?

If you don't take some of the RACETRACK home with you, Ya got cheated

  #45  
Old 02-17-2020, 10:43 PM
Big Bear's Avatar
Big Bear Big Bear is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Ont Canada
Posts: 132
Default

Looking at OP pictures the valve covers don't look to be 389 and the later carbs have the choke on the base plate like the one in the picture. The 66 carb would be on the horn.

  #46  
Old 03-02-2020, 05:04 PM
Tomaso Tomaso is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 86
Default

Would a 68 Ram air 4bbl intake work? I found one for 100 bucks. But not sure if it would work?

__________________
Mike
  #47  
Old 03-02-2020, 06:26 PM
"QUICK-SILVER" "QUICK-SILVER" is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: LaFayette Georgia
Posts: 5,514
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomaso View Post
Would a 68 Ram air 4bbl intake work? I found one for 100 bucks. But not sure if it would work?
Mike,

Yes it will fit.

Just don't pay extra for the Ram Air name. If it's not bolted on a RA engine, it's just another 68~69 cast iron intake. Nothing on those intakes to identify them as RA. A late 68 date code would make it a 69 intake that came on all V8 4bbl engines except RA-IV that had aluminum intakes.

Make sense?
Clay

  #48  
Old 03-02-2020, 06:28 PM
Tomaso Tomaso is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 86
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by "QUICK-SILVER" View Post
Mike,

Yes it will fit.

Just don't pay extra for the Ram Air name. If it's not bolted on a RA engine, it's just another 68~69 cast iron intake. Nothing on those intakes to identify them as RA. A late 68 date code would make it a 69 intake that came on all V8 4bbl engines except RA-IV that had aluminum intakes.

Make sense?
Clay
Yes! Makes sense! Thank you.
By any chance do you know if there’s any specific carb I would need for it? Or can I choose Holley or afb?

__________________
Mike
  #49  
Old 03-02-2020, 06:55 PM
"QUICK-SILVER" "QUICK-SILVER" is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: LaFayette Georgia
Posts: 5,514
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomaso View Post
Yes! Makes sense! Thank you.
By any chance do you know if there’s any specific carb I would need for it? Or can I choose Holley or afb?
Quadrajet only... The adapters to put a square bore carburetor on a factory spreadbore intake don't work good at all. Primary throttle bores don't line up worth a hoot. Half the fuel/air flow hits a wall and creates puddling.

Should have a pic here that shows the problem.

Found it, Black is square bore throttle opening and silver is the primaries on a spreadbore.



Clay
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Square to Spread.jpg
Views:	243
Size:	11.8 KB
ID:	533603  

  #50  
Old 03-02-2020, 07:00 PM
Tomaso Tomaso is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 86
Default

So in your opinion. Would this be a good upgrade if I can find a quadra jet?
I'm waiting for seller to respond back as I think it's a fair price. I cant find a lot in my area as it is.

__________________
Mike
  #51  
Old 03-02-2020, 07:18 PM
"QUICK-SILVER" "QUICK-SILVER" is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: LaFayette Georgia
Posts: 5,514
Default

Tough call on that without knowing why it doesn't want to get-up-and-go now.

A good quadrajet would be an upgrade over the 2bbl if everything else is up to it. Everything being; over all engine condition, fuel supply, ignition system, etc..

Myself, I'ld be tinkering with what you've got
At least for now
Clay

  #52  
Old 03-02-2020, 07:19 PM
Tomaso Tomaso is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 86
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by "QUICK-SILVER" View Post
Tough call on that without knowing why it doesn't want to get-up-and-go now.

A good quadrajet would be an upgrade over the 2bbl if everything else is up to it. Everything being; over all engine condition, fuel supply, ignition system, etc..

Myself, I'ld be tinkering with what you've got
At least for now
Clay
That sounds good. I was looking for quadrajets and they’re not cheap.
I’m better off rebuilding the 2bbl for now and saving for an rpm performer intake later on...

__________________
Mike
  #53  
Old 03-03-2020, 05:35 PM
Dragncar Dragncar is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Humbolt County California
Posts: 8,325
Default

We had a AFB on our 66 Catalina station wagon, it got 19mpg, pretty good for a car that heavy. I still have the intake and carb. Have 2 AFB intakes, one is almost flat and the other has a little rise to it.

  #54  
Old 03-03-2020, 06:48 PM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 20,574
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by "QUICK-SILVER" View Post
Quadrajet only... The adapters to put a square bore carburetor on a factory spreadbore intake don't work good at all. Primary throttle bores don't line up worth a hoot. Half the fuel/air flow hits a wall and creates puddling.

Should have a pic here that shows the problem.

Found it, Black is square bore throttle opening and silver is the primaries on a spreadbore.



Clay
Funny using an open adapter swapping a Demon 850 DP on my 455 at the track same day on an HO intake on a healthy 455 and a Brad urban Qjet picked up 0.2 seconds-so must not have hurt it too bad.

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
  #55  
Old 03-03-2020, 06:57 PM
77 TRASHCAN's Avatar
77 TRASHCAN 77 TRASHCAN is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 31May2013 Temporary home to the world's widest (that we know of) tornado. Lord, NO more Please...
Posts: 6,594
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomaso View Post
That sounds good. I was looking for quadrajets and they’re not cheap.
I’m better off rebuilding the 2bbl for now and saving for an rpm performer intake later on...
You may really like the 2 Bbl, after it is rebuilt! Of course there are other tuning parameters that need to be addressed, before all can be called “good”!

__________________
1977 Black Trans Am 180 HP Auto, essentially base model T/A.
I'm the original owner, purchased May 7, 1977.

Shut it off
Shut it off
Buddy, I just shut your Prius down...
  #56  
Old 03-09-2020, 07:49 AM
Tomaso Tomaso is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 86
Default

I didn’t rebuild the carb yet. Bet we sprayed some carb cleaner and now she’s running good? We will still rebuild carb since I bought the kit. But we wanted to try the carb cleaner.
So far, she’s not dying out and actually going into gear and moving now.

__________________
Mike
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:46 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017