THE LOBBY A gathering place. Introductions, sports, showin' off your ride, birthday-anniversary-milestone, achievements, family oriented humor.

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-17-2013, 09:30 PM
mgarblik mgarblik is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,096
Default

Of course these trucks are designed to make it a very tough decision for you. In the numerous tests I have read, they are neck and neck. I can say with some experience that the eco-boost V-6 should not be a consideration if mileage is the goal. They don't even come close to their rated mileage and the EPA is looking into de-rating the mileage on the entire eco-boost line. The 5.3 and 6.0 liter GM engines are simple and very proven. Also the GM trucks are much easier to service under the hood than the Fords. Ask anyone who has changed plugs in a 5.4 Ford what a joy that is. Fords do have nice interiors and the little things like window regulators, accessories, and switches don't fall apart like cheap Chinese toys like the GM stuff. Since I likely have been no help, you have a tough but fun decision to make!

  #22  
Old 11-17-2013, 09:59 PM
keith k's Avatar
keith k keith k is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 3,566
Default

I just picked up my '14 F150 this week. It's a regular cab, short box, 2WD with the 5.0.

I know engine technology isn't a why buy for most truck owners (just how much torque it has), but I love the idea of this thing having an all aluminum, DOHC, 32V V8 with VCT. What a sweet motor...

__________________
keith k
70 Trans Am RA III / T400 / Lucerne Blue / Bright Blue
70 Trans Am RA III / M20 / Lucerne Blue / Sandalwood
70 Formula RA III / M21 / Lucerne Blue / Bright Blue
  #23  
Old 11-17-2013, 10:30 PM
Keith Vrabec's Avatar
Keith Vrabec Keith Vrabec is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: White Haven, PA
Posts: 1,526
Default

My local garage changes more Ford truck engines than Dodge rears...That's saying something...

The Following User Says Thank You to Keith Vrabec For This Useful Post:
  #24  
Old 11-17-2013, 10:44 PM
455Grandville's Avatar
455Grandville 455Grandville is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: St Genevieve County
Posts: 1,536
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgarblik View Post
Of course these trucks are designed to make it a very tough decision for you. In the numerous tests I have read, they are neck and neck. I can say with some experience that the eco-boost V-6 should not be a consideration if mileage is the goal. They don't even come close to their rated mileage and the EPA is looking into de-rating the mileage on the entire eco-boost line. !
In Car and Driver they tested the 5.3 Chebby, Hemi Ram and the Ecoboost and they all scored the same exact fuel economy. The Ford was roughly .5 ahead of the Chebby and the Ram in the 1/4 mile. Same fuel economy with a lot more balls -


Quote:
Originally Posted by My442 View Post

I would stay away from the Eco Boost.
Why ?

__________________
Two 1975 455 Grandvilles &
'79 455 Trans Am
‘69 Camaro SS 396/375 (owned since ‘88)
‘22 Toyota Sequoia V8
‘23 Lexus LS500 awd
‘95 Ford F-super duty 4wd 7.3 p-stroke
& countless Jeeps & off road vehicles.
  #25  
Old 11-17-2013, 11:31 PM
David Jones's Avatar
David Jones David Jones is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Pleasant Grove, Alabama
Posts: 8,412
Default

Ecoboost is a $1000 waste of money. In many cases guys running it are soundly disappointed in their mileage.
And more importantly.......the 5.0 sounds better.

__________________

frittering and wasting the hours in an off hand way....



1969 GTO, 455ci, 230/236 Pontiac Dude's "Butcher Special" Comp hyd roller cam with Crower HIPPO solid roller lifters, Q-jet, Edelbrock P4B-QJ, Doug's headers, ported 6X-8 (97cc) heads, TKO600, 3.73 geared Eaton Tru-Trac 8.5", hydroboost, rear disc brakes......and my greatest mechanical feat....a new heater core.
  #26  
Old 11-18-2013, 08:37 AM
The Boss's Avatar
The Boss The Boss is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Newtown, CT
Posts: 15,454
Default

Back in 2007 I was looking at the same decision - which 1/2 ton pickup to buy so I could semi-retire my 1 ton. 6 years later I have 140,000 trouble free miles on my 07 Tacoma. It cost less, got better mileage, had NO maintenance required, and is probably worth more than a comparably equipped/mileage Ford or Chevy.

I've towed with it, gone on vacation, picked up engines & car parts with it - done it all. With my son in college and my daughter going in a year & a half I look to have it for another 5 years and another 100k miles.

__________________
Some guys they just give up living
And start dying little by little, piece by piece,
Some guys come home from work and wash up,
And go racin' in the street.


Bruce Springsteen - Racing In The Street - 1978
  #27  
Old 11-18-2013, 09:46 PM
67GTONUT's Avatar
67GTONUT 67GTONUT is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Rockaway, NJ, USA
Posts: 1,501
Default

OK..... drove the Ford tonight.... I love the truck

Told the salesperson and one of the sales managers I have been in the auto business for 25+ years..... please treat me as such and I will make this simple....

Well the General Sales Manager didnt seem to get it..... and came back with stupid numbers and said there are NO rebates if I dont finance with Ford....

Well, the Ford website says otherwise, and I called another dealer, and he also said there were rebates, but what he said didnt agree with the Ford website....

Does anyone here work for Ford or Ford dealer that is willing to look up what incentives would apply to me here in NJ on a Retail Purchase on a 2013 Ford STX Supercab 4x4 with a 5.0L?

Thank you

__________________
Troy
Rockaway NJ
67 GTO
400HO / TKX 3.27 1ST GEAR-.72OD / 3.36 POSI
HOTCHKIS/UMI/BILSTEIN
  #28  
Old 11-18-2013, 10:20 PM
400 4spd.'s Avatar
400 4spd. 400 4spd. is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Eastern N.C.
Posts: 4,833
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 67GTONUT View Post
nah..... I am in the auto business myself for 25+ years, so wherever I walk in, and I get to talking to the Sales Manager..... I get treated like employee regardless



So how does it feel being treated like an employee? People seem to think working at a dealership gets you deals. Been there, done that.

  #29  
Old 11-18-2013, 10:22 PM
67GTONUT's Avatar
67GTONUT 67GTONUT is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Rockaway, NJ, USA
Posts: 1,501
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 400 4spd. View Post
[/B]


So how does it feel being treated like an employee? Been there, done that.
Yeah..... Well, they also didnt sell a truck..... jerks

__________________
Troy
Rockaway NJ
67 GTO
400HO / TKX 3.27 1ST GEAR-.72OD / 3.36 POSI
HOTCHKIS/UMI/BILSTEIN
  #30  
Old 11-18-2013, 11:09 PM
zephyrracer zephyrracer is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Rockford Mi
Posts: 393
Default

Don't just look in NJ come here to MI dealers will bend over backwards for you, on a better way to buy a new ford is to look up what businesses have a fleet discount such as Steelcase or the Teamsters, this could be you your wife child a friend and call around to a salesman that knows of someone that has the code number that's all you need for a discount is the persons name and the code then the discount comes directly from ford and the dealer can do no better its a Ford factory deal, I just purchased 2 this way, I just came back from vacation all around New England and I bet trucks are at a premium with all the mountains and winding roads. Google Ford x plan or z plan good luck.

Gregg

  #31  
Old 11-19-2013, 12:24 AM
The Champ's Avatar
The Champ The Champ is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Rochester, MN
Posts: 2,536
Default

Troy

With your experience at Ford dealerships - I wouldn't buy anything from them.

One thing you didn't mention on your list of pros and cons...

Warranty - The GMC has a 5 year/100,000 mile powertrain. Ford only gives you 60,000 miles.

Based on Keith V's post above (#23) - that would concern me.

The Following User Says Thank You to The Champ For This Useful Post:
  #32  
Old 11-19-2013, 07:39 AM
67GTONUT's Avatar
67GTONUT 67GTONUT is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Rockaway, NJ, USA
Posts: 1,501
Default

I already sent the Sales Manager that talked to me for quite awhile and email, we were going over people we both knew in the business..... that is usually a good sign, I am going to get treated like I expected. Unfortunately, it was his boss in the "glass tower" that worked the numbers.... and blew the deal for them.

I went home and worked the numbers myself ( like I said, I am a previous F&I manager), and they were a good $50/mo high.

I then called the Ford dealer 10mi further down the road, and I think I can work a deal and be treated like I am in the business there, he of course was not surprised at my experience at the first dealer...

As far as the warranty.... I am not concerned. There are good and bad vehicle in both brands..... it can be luck at times, but I try to never let it make my whole decision.

Here is a question I have to guys that tow.....

GM says their truck needs 3.42 gears to tow 9000+ lbs

The Ford will do a little less then 7000lbs with 3.55's and rate the 3.73's at 9000+ lbs

Is GM exaggerating their towing cabability or will the Ford tow fine with the 3.55's and the 3.73 not needed for the heavier weight?

Reason I ask..... if I can do the 3.55's in the Ford, there is a lot more available inventory around to look at.....

__________________
Troy
Rockaway NJ
67 GTO
400HO / TKX 3.27 1ST GEAR-.72OD / 3.36 POSI
HOTCHKIS/UMI/BILSTEIN
  #33  
Old 11-19-2013, 08:08 AM
lockec lockec is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Hoschton, Georgia
Posts: 124
Default

Bought my F150 4x4 5.0 6 months ago and really liking it. The 5.0 is stout and I would suspect it to pull what you need with the 3.55's but you may want to do further research. My local dealer is giving 13K off MSRP and has been for a while. You can Google Akins Ford if you need some comparison and maybe something for the dealer to match. This is for trucks with the chrome package which may not help you.

The Following User Says Thank You to lockec For This Useful Post:
  #34  
Old 11-19-2013, 08:40 AM
2002Z4CSS's Avatar
2002Z4CSS 2002Z4CSS is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Westland, MI
Posts: 3,782
Default

We have 2 Silverados at home with the factory heavy duty towing package and both have 3.42 rear ends and both have towed over 8,000 lbs many times with no issues at all and still delivered 16 mpg on the hi way while towing and using the tow haul mode.

__________________
1971 Pontiac GT-37

Car is a junk yard dog and maybe one day will be restored.
The Following User Says Thank You to 2002Z4CSS For This Useful Post:
  #35  
Old 11-19-2013, 08:43 AM
67GTONUT's Avatar
67GTONUT 67GTONUT is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Rockaway, NJ, USA
Posts: 1,501
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2002Z4CSS View Post
We have 2 Silverados at home with the factory heavy duty towing package and both have 3.42 rear ends and both have towed over 8,000 lbs many times with no issues at all and still delivered 16 mpg on the hi way while towing and using the tow haul mode.
No doubt.... Just curious why Ford feels that the 3.55's wont....

__________________
Troy
Rockaway NJ
67 GTO
400HO / TKX 3.27 1ST GEAR-.72OD / 3.36 POSI
HOTCHKIS/UMI/BILSTEIN
  #36  
Old 11-19-2013, 08:47 AM
The Champ's Avatar
The Champ The Champ is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Rochester, MN
Posts: 2,536
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 67GTONUT View Post
Here is a question I have to guys that tow.....

GM says their truck needs 3.42 gears to tow 9000+ lbs

The Ford will do a little less then 7000lbs with 3.55's and rate the 3.73's at 9000+ lbs

Is GM exaggerating their towing cabability or will the Ford tow fine with the 3.55's and the 3.73 not needed for the heavier weight?

Reason I ask..... if I can do the 3.55's in the Ford, there is a lot more available inventory around to look at.....
It might be the transmission that is the weak link - and that could be why Ford recommends the 3.73's for the heavier loads. I would stick with the factory recommendations - especially with 40,000 miles less drivetrain warranty.

  #37  
Old 11-19-2013, 09:15 AM
455Grandville's Avatar
455Grandville 455Grandville is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: St Genevieve County
Posts: 1,536
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 67GTONUT View Post
I already sent the Sales Manager that talked to me for quite awhile and email, we were going over people we both knew in the business..... that is usually a good sign, I am going to get treated like I expected. Unfortunately, it was his boss in the "glass tower" that worked the numbers.... and blew the deal for them.

I went home and worked the numbers myself ( like I said, I am a previous F&I manager), and they were a good $50/mo high.

I then called the Ford dealer 10mi further down the road, and I think I can work a deal and be treated like I am in the business there, he of course was not surprised at my experience at the first dealer...

As far as the warranty.... I am not concerned. There are good and bad vehicle in both brands..... it can be luck at times, but I try to never let it make my whole decision.

Here is a question I have to guys that tow.....

GM says their truck needs 3.42 gears to tow 9000+ lbs

The Ford will do a little less then 7000lbs with 3.55's and rate the 3.73's at 9000+ lbs

Is GM exaggerating their towing cabability or will the Ford tow fine with the 3.55's and the 3.73 not needed for the heavier weight?

Reason I ask..... if I can do the 3.55's in the Ford, there is a lot more available inventory around to look at.....
If you're going to be doing a lot of towing and working a truck hard the Ford is the one to get. But after your experience if you do by a Ford I would go to a different dealer.

I've had numerous trucks over the years that I have worked relentlessly and Fords have always had more study frames and were much more stout. The GM frames were just not up to the task ; we actually broke a one ton frame on a newer one.

I like the looks of the new GM's and I'm sure they're well made, but it depends on what you'll use it for a majority of the time.

But as one engineer pointed out -


Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Vaught View Post
Brad, We were breaking a lot of Chebby truck frames on our 'Cobble stone' durability circuit on the Dearborn, Michigan Brand X (F*rd) Test Track (competitive vehicle testing).
Mileage was typically 15,000 miles on the frame.

We would call up the "Generous" Motors guys and they would have a truck there the next day with a new frame for the truck. PIA to swap that thing out but the test required 100,000 miles. We would go through several frame swaps with those trucks.

Tom Vaught

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Champ View Post
It might be the transmission that is the weak link - and that could be why Ford recommends the 3.73's for the heavier loads. I would stick with the factory recommendations - especially with 40,000 miles less drivetrain warranty.
hmmmm - wouldn't that also depend on the first gear multiplication.....could the GM's be a little lower ?

__________________
Two 1975 455 Grandvilles &
'79 455 Trans Am
‘69 Camaro SS 396/375 (owned since ‘88)
‘22 Toyota Sequoia V8
‘23 Lexus LS500 awd
‘95 Ford F-super duty 4wd 7.3 p-stroke
& countless Jeeps & off road vehicles.
The Following User Says Thank You to 455Grandville For This Useful Post:
  #38  
Old 11-19-2013, 10:51 AM
The Champ's Avatar
The Champ The Champ is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Rochester, MN
Posts: 2,536
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 455Grandville View Post
I've had numerous trucks over the years that I have worked relentlessly and Fords have always had more study frames and were much more stout. The GM frames were just not up to the task ; we actually broke a one ton frame on a newer one.
The Ford might have had a better frame at one point. But that hasn't been the case for several years.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6sPEvxpLoU

Frame content starts at about 2:35.

As to first gear in the two trucks - the Ford has a 3.97 first gear, the GM has a 4.03 - or a .06 difference.

That doesn't correlate to the need for 3.73's vs 3.42's - or a difference of .29.

The Following User Says Thank You to The Champ For This Useful Post:
  #39  
Old 11-19-2013, 11:14 AM
455Grandville's Avatar
455Grandville 455Grandville is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: St Genevieve County
Posts: 1,536
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Champ View Post
The Ford might have had a better frame at one point. But that hasn't been the case for several years.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6sPEvxpLoU

Frame content starts at about 2:35.

As to first gear in the two trucks - the Ford has a 3.97 first gear, the GM has a 4.03 - or a .06 difference.

That doesn't correlate to the need for 3.73's vs 3.42's - or a difference of .29.
Gears : uh-huh the difference there : squat.

As far as the frame goes: the only thing that video shows is Ford has more elasticity. Doesn't seem the maker of the video understands metallurgy; buildings and bridges have the same thing - too much rigidity and it snaps ! That Ford did exactly what HD dump trucks do.
You certainly want flex on nasty terrain with a load; that's how that Chevy frame I mentioned probably snapped !

__________________
Two 1975 455 Grandvilles &
'79 455 Trans Am
‘69 Camaro SS 396/375 (owned since ‘88)
‘22 Toyota Sequoia V8
‘23 Lexus LS500 awd
‘95 Ford F-super duty 4wd 7.3 p-stroke
& countless Jeeps & off road vehicles.
  #40  
Old 11-19-2013, 12:01 PM
67GTONUT's Avatar
67GTONUT 67GTONUT is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Rockaway, NJ, USA
Posts: 1,501
Default

Well..... I have already at least 2 dealers willing to do an invoice deal less rebates...... and still more calling me back....

I will get this done....

__________________
Troy
Rockaway NJ
67 GTO
400HO / TKX 3.27 1ST GEAR-.72OD / 3.36 POSI
HOTCHKIS/UMI/BILSTEIN
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:56 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017