Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
View Poll Results: Which intake for this combo?
P4B 3 5.45%
Performer 6 10.91%
Performer RPM 19 34.55%
Holley Street Dominator 4 7.27%
Torker 1 0 0%
Torker 2 6 10.91%
Other 17 30.91%
Voters: 55. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-20-2020, 06:06 PM
Speargun's Avatar
Speargun Speargun is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Silver Springs, FL
Posts: 919
Default Time to pick an intake

I'm just about done with the 400 to replace the destructo 469 and need to choose an intake. I have an idea on what I think it will like, but I want to see what you would run.

Here's the combo:
400 +.030
Lunati Voodoo 702 cam
9.76:1 SCR 8.26:1 DCR
16 heads
Icon forged dish pistons
Scat forged H-beam rods
Factory crank
Fitech EFI

Going into a '67 Firebird with 3.54 gears and will see around 7000 miles per year. Use will be grocery getter, weekend cruiser, and maybe a trip to the track once or twice a year.

============================
Cam Style: Hydraulic flat tappet
Basic Operating RPM Range: 1,300-5,500
Duration at 050 inch Lift: 219 int./227 exh.
Advertised Duration: 262 int./268 exh.
Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.468 int./0.489 exh.
Lobe Separation (degrees): 112

__________________
No!
Do not try!
Do! Or do not.
There is no try. - Yoda


1967 Firebird Restoration 2005 - 1/25/2017
  #2  
Old 01-20-2020, 06:19 PM
shaker455's Avatar
shaker455 shaker455 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NH
Posts: 4,471
Default

Stock intake would be fine.
Maybe jump over the performer and "try" an RPM.
Would be nice if you cut you water crossover free so you can change plenums at will.

__________________
Carburetor building & modification services
Servicing the Pontiac community over 20 years
  #3  
Old 01-20-2020, 06:31 PM
77 TRASHCAN's Avatar
77 TRASHCAN 77 TRASHCAN is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 31May2013 Temporary home to the world's widest (that we know of) tornado. Lord, NO more Please...
Posts: 6,594
Default

72 stock iron, nothing else needs to be considered!!!

68-72....

__________________
1977 Black Trans Am 180 HP Auto, essentially base model T/A.
I'm the original owner, purchased May 7, 1977.

Shut it off
Shut it off
Buddy, I just shut your Prius down...
  #4  
Old 01-20-2020, 06:36 PM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 20,577
Default

I'll agree a stock intake maybe an HO or a repop HO IF you get one without bad core shift-even them weld and port matching. They are a good 20 lbs lighter!

But since using the Fitech not sure how their spreadbore options are.

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
  #5  
Old 01-20-2020, 06:44 PM
firebirdcrazy1959's Avatar
firebirdcrazy1959 firebirdcrazy1959 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South West Gulf Coast
Posts: 2,942
Default

Stock..Ran a Performer and a Torker 1 ..Stock is the way to go..

__________________
1977 Trans Am,400 4 speed,numbers matching car
1979 Bonneville ,1 owner car...
1997 Trans Am convertible,LT1/auto.
  #6  
Old 01-20-2020, 07:14 PM
TransAm 474's Avatar
TransAm 474 TransAm 474 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cape Fair,Mo
Posts: 794
Default

I agree with others, Stock 68-72 Iron would work great. If you are wanting to use aluminum, definitely jump over the "Performer", and use the "Performer RPM". If this is a street application, I wouldnt even consider the single plane manifolds.

__________________
1978 Trans Am
Pump Gas 461 Stroker
  #7  
Old 01-20-2020, 07:21 PM
Formulajones's Avatar
Formulajones Formulajones is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 10,843
Default

On such a mild build like that I'd run a stock intake. If you want aluminum I'd grab a repop HO/RAIV intake.

I've been daily driving and racing one of those for a couple years now on a 400 and can't discern any difference in performance at all between the two.

  #8  
Old 01-20-2020, 07:31 PM
Steve C. Steve C. is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Liberty Hill, Tx. (Austin)
Posts: 10,421
Default

And I'll suggest on this specific combo you wouldn't discern much difference on the street with a STOCK iron intake and a Edelbrock Performer intake. Providing both have ports that match OK to the heads in use. The Performer intake will be lighter.

Onward thru the fog.


.

__________________
'70 TA / 505 cid / same engine but revised ( previous best 10.63 at 127.05 )
Old information here:
http://www.hotrod.com/articles/0712p...tiac-trans-am/

Sponsor of the world's fastest Pontiac powered Ford Fairmont (engine)
5.14 at 140 mph (1/8 mile) , true 10.5 tire, stock type suspension
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDoJnIP3HgE

Last edited by Steve C.; 01-20-2020 at 08:15 PM.
  #9  
Old 01-20-2020, 07:51 PM
Mike Davis's Avatar
Mike Davis Mike Davis is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Athens Ga, or at a NMCA race
Posts: 1,994
Default

Holley Street Dominator or my favorite Warrior.

__________________
66 GTO Nostalgia Super Stock/Street Legal Car
421 CID, stock block, Wenzler Intake, 2- Carter 750 AFB's, 3.90 Gears, Full Factory Interior, Full Exhaust, Stock Suspension 3750LBS 9.77@136.99
Multiple NSCA/NMCA World Champion

66 GTO 389 3x2, 4 speed, 4.33 gear, Montero Red 33K original Miles
67 GTO 2dr Post, 428, Tri Power, 3.55 Gears
80 Trans Am Black SE Y84 W72 WS6
  #10  
Old 01-20-2020, 08:01 PM
Steve C. Steve C. is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Liberty Hill, Tx. (Austin)
Posts: 10,421
Default

How much more HP does it take to push that extra 25-30 lbs of cast iron intake.

From the 'fact or fiction file'.......

"Even the lowly Edelbrock Performer consistently provides more low-end torque with stock D-port heads than any of the factory 4-bbl manifolds"

Pete McCarthy
Pontiac Enthusiast Magazine article, 1997

And here he was talking about a 400 not a 455 !

Even Cliff Ruggles stated that over the years he had a lot of smaller CID Pontiac engines that he was involved with that used Performer intakes, and they seem fine and none of them had any stumble, hesitation, ping or any other problems like he found with his KRE headed 455.

Lets keep it apples-to-apples ! !


.

__________________
'70 TA / 505 cid / same engine but revised ( previous best 10.63 at 127.05 )
Old information here:
http://www.hotrod.com/articles/0712p...tiac-trans-am/

Sponsor of the world's fastest Pontiac powered Ford Fairmont (engine)
5.14 at 140 mph (1/8 mile) , true 10.5 tire, stock type suspension
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDoJnIP3HgE

Last edited by Steve C.; 01-20-2020 at 08:13 PM.
The Following User Says Thank You to Steve C. For This Useful Post:
  #11  
Old 01-20-2020, 08:11 PM
"QUICK-SILVER" "QUICK-SILVER" is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: LaFayette Georgia
Posts: 5,514
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve C. View Post
And I'll suggest on this specific combo you wouldn't discern much difference on the street with a STOCK iron intake and a Edelbrock Performer intake. Providing both have ports that match Ok to the heads in use. The Performer intake will be lighter.

Onward thru the fog.


.
Good read here that backs up what you're saying.

https://www.dapa.org/building-a-stro...ests/#more-106

Clay

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to "QUICK-SILVER" For This Useful Post:
  #12  
Old 01-20-2020, 09:10 PM
David Jones's Avatar
David Jones David Jones is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Pleasant Grove, Alabama
Posts: 8,412
Default

I wonder if the FI Tech would prefer one over the other.

__________________

frittering and wasting the hours in an off hand way....



1969 GTO, 455ci, 230/236 Pontiac Dude's "Butcher Special" Comp hyd roller cam with Crower HIPPO solid roller lifters, Q-jet, Edelbrock P4B-QJ, Doug's headers, ported 6X-8 (97cc) heads, TKO600, 3.73 geared Eaton Tru-Trac 8.5", hydroboost, rear disc brakes......and my greatest mechanical feat....a new heater core.
  #13  
Old 01-20-2020, 10:05 PM
Speargun's Avatar
Speargun Speargun is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Silver Springs, FL
Posts: 919
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Jones View Post
I wonder if the FI Tech would prefer one over the other.
Some say it has issues on a dual plane intake. Others say that a notch cut in the divider helps. Other say only a single plane will work...
I've always ran a single plane intake with my Fitech so I don't have any first hand experience with any dual plane issues.

__________________
No!
Do not try!
Do! Or do not.
There is no try. - Yoda


1967 Firebird Restoration 2005 - 1/25/2017
  #14  
Old 01-20-2020, 10:11 PM
67gtospud's Avatar
67gtospud 67gtospud is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seymour, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Speargun View Post
Some say it has issues on a dual plane intake. Others say that a notch cut in the divider helps. Other say only a single plane will work...
I've always ran a single plane intake with my Fitech so I don't have any first hand experience with any dual plane issues.
I ran my FiTech on a factory dual plane intake with zero issues.

My vote is a factory intake OR a performer RPM if hood clearance is an issue. You won’t need a square bore to spread bore adapter with the performer rpm

__________________
1967 GTO, 432 (428+.030), 4-bolt mains, factory Nodular crank, scat rods, icon dished pistons, Lunati HR 243/251@.050, .618/.622 lift, Edelbrock 72cc round port heads, 10.5:1, offy 2-4 intake, Edelbrock 650cfm carbs, Super T10 trans (2.64 first), BOP 10 bolt w/ Eaton posi and 3.36 gears
  #15  
Old 01-20-2020, 10:13 PM
Gary H's Avatar
Gary H Gary H is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 1,331
Default

Factory intake with a spread bore pattern Fitech, or if square bore Fitech use a Holley Street Dominator or Torker II

__________________
62' Lemans, Nostalgia Super Stock, 541 CI, IA2 block, billet 4.5" crank, Ross, Wide port Edelbrocks, Gustram intake, 2 4150 style BLP carbs, 2.10 Turbo 400, 9" w/4:30 gears, 8.76 @153, 3100lbs
  #16  
Old 01-20-2020, 10:13 PM
TransAm 474's Avatar
TransAm 474 TransAm 474 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cape Fair,Mo
Posts: 794
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Jones View Post
I wonder if the FI Tech would prefer one over the other.
The Fitech systems have been used successfully in both Dual Plane and Single Plane applications, but since the Fitech is a TBI system, and not a true "Port EFI" system, that injects fuel right into the valve, I still prefer the Dual Plane for a street application. We own two of the Fitech systems so far, both are used with superchargers. One is in a 1986 Trans Am, and is the 1200 PA Fitech system used as a "blowthrough" on a 383 sbc with AFR 195 heads and a D1SC Procharger pumping 14 psi boost. We use the Performer RPM Air-Gap intake on this application and works really well. The other is in a 1985 Chevrolet Long Bed C10 2wd pickup, and is the the 600 PA Fitech system used as a "drawthrough" on another 383 sbc with Brodix IK180 heads and a Magnuson M122 roots supercharger pumping 7 psi boost. For a "Port EFI" application, where the only thing that is being pulled through the manifold is the Air(not both Air/Fuel), I would no doubt prefer a Single Plane on all applications. Hopefully sometime in the near future, I will be converting the 750 Quick Fuel carb currently on my naturally aspirated 461 Pontiac, over to the 1200 Fitech, along with the addition of an 80mm billet BorgWarner S480 turbo.

__________________
1978 Trans Am
Pump Gas 461 Stroker
  #17  
Old 01-20-2020, 10:29 PM
Half-Inch Stud's Avatar
Half-Inch Stud Half-Inch Stud is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: BlueBell, PA or AL U.S.A.
Posts: 18,474
Default

Stock Iron intake
P4B
Performer RPM

We could agonize over which of these 3 Dual-Planes is better. I suggest "no difference" until there is a quantified evauation desired. Use whichever you have like.

  #18  
Old 01-20-2020, 10:33 PM
hobbygto65's Avatar
hobbygto65 hobbygto65 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Brainerd,MN
Posts: 1,767
Default

Do I get to vote twice, I have 2 RPM 's?

  #19  
Old 01-20-2020, 11:31 PM
grandam1979 grandam1979 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ohio, Findlay
Posts: 1,437
Default

Performer or stock

  #20  
Old 01-20-2020, 11:44 PM
Scott65's Avatar
Scott65 Scott65 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,991
Default

If you have a stocker, or a Performer, give it a try. My only experience with efi, throttle body mounted or mpfi is on single planes. It works well like that, but I'd think a single plane wouldn't be the best choice for what you're doing, unless maybe it was mpfi. FWIW, there's what looks like a nice Holley street dominator knock off with injector bosses cast in, polished, in the classifieds right now, priced right.
Edited to add: Not mine, no affiliation at all.

__________________
'65 Tempest 467 3650# 11.30@120.31

Last edited by Scott65; 01-20-2020 at 11:46 PM. Reason: Clarification
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:55 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017