Tri-Power Tech 57-66 Tri-Power Talk

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 12-02-2017, 04:54 PM
elefantrider's Avatar
elefantrider elefantrider is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: So. California
Posts: 2,293
Default

Here is one of the better intakes. Still needed a little port straightening. I forget where this one was from. Some intakes had darker aluminum, and some very bright aluminum. All seemed soft compared to other aluminum intakes.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	63 tempest pics 080 (2).jpg
Views:	65
Size:	111.1 KB
ID:	469226   Click image for larger version

Name:	63 tempest pics 081 (2).jpg
Views:	59
Size:	147.6 KB
ID:	469227  

  #22  
Old 12-03-2017, 11:38 AM
Dick Boneske's Avatar
Dick Boneske Dick Boneske is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Winneconne, Wisconsin
Posts: 5,388
Default

I was under the impression that all of these manifolds come from the same manufacturer—same place.

Every oem cast iron Pontiac intake I’ve seen has near-perfect gasket match/port match. Casting methods/casting quality improved significantly in the years just prior to 1966. These aluminum castings must use an inferior process even though they’re 20 years + newer than 1966.

__________________
BONESTOCK GOATS

'64 GTO Tripower Hardtop (Wife's Car)
'64 GTO Tripower Post Coupe (My Car)
'99 Bonneville SE Sedan
  #23  
Old 12-03-2017, 12:17 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,303
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Boneske View Post
I was under the impression that all of these manifolds come from the same manufacturer—same place.

Every oem cast iron Pontiac intake I’ve seen has near-perfect gasket match/port match. Casting methods/casting quality improved significantly in the years just prior to 1966. These aluminum castings must use an inferior process even though they’re 20 years + newer than 1966.
The Original Aluminum 1966 Tri-Power Manifolds were made (with these cores) by the FIRST Individual. That individual is long gone from the process.
The following cores (by others) were never as good as these cores. I speak truth Kemo-sabe!

Tom V.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	tri-power intake1.jpg
Views:	70
Size:	18.5 KB
ID:	469323   Click image for larger version

Name:	tri-power intake2.jpg
Views:	66
Size:	13.2 KB
ID:	469324  

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #24  
Old 12-23-2017, 08:01 AM
chrisp chrisp is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: upper dublin Pa.
Posts: 2,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Boneske View Post
I was under the impression that all of these manifolds come from the same manufacturer—same place.

Every oem cast iron Pontiac intake I’ve seen has near-perfect gasket match/port match. Casting methods/casting quality improved significantly in the years just prior to 1966. These aluminum castings must use an inferior process even though they’re 20 years + newer than 1966.
Good point , but when one does not give a hoot this is what we get . Quality is the key , not looks .

  #25  
Old 12-23-2017, 11:49 AM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,303
Default

I believe the 1st supplier and Chris C tried very hard to produce a high level casting for the PY Forum Guys. What happened later with the "other" manifolds, I can't speak about.

I flowed the 1st Run manifolds for Chris years ago and provided a flow report to him with the results.

Tom V.

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #26  
Old 12-24-2017, 07:35 AM
chrisp chrisp is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: upper dublin Pa.
Posts: 2,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Vaught View Post
I believe the 1st supplier and Chris C tried very hard to produce a high level casting for the PY Forum Guys. What happened later with the "other" manifolds, I can't speak about.

I flowed the 1st Run manifolds for Chris years ago and provided a flow report to him with the results.

Tom V.
They were the good ones , after that the bad load arrived & is still present . How did the manifold flow from your testing ?

  #27  
Old 12-24-2017, 10:43 AM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,303
Default

We had ONE runner in the back of the intake that was 7 cfm lower vs the rest of them.

All of the other ones were with-in 3 cfm of each other. Virgin untouched intakes.

A Guy like Dave Wallace (who did my BG 6-Shooter intake porting) would be happy with the starting point.

The testing was done on a super flow 1200 Carb bench.

Tom V.

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:46 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017