Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-19-2019, 11:08 AM
nikrnic's Avatar
nikrnic nikrnic is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: bloomfield hills, MI
Posts: 46
Default 326 GTO ?

Could someone please post any info and (RPO NO.) on the no cost 326 option for the GTO (I think 67 only or maybe 66/67). Thanks in advance to all.!

Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk

  #2  
Old 08-19-2019, 11:26 AM
242177P's Avatar
242177P 242177P is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,716
Default

Are you talking about the econo GTO?
That was 67-69, they still used the 400.

  #3  
Old 08-19-2019, 11:54 AM
spartazoo's Avatar
spartazoo spartazoo is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 859
Default

67-69 you could get a econo 2bbl auto configuration. But, as 242 said, they still used a 400. I actually saw a 1967 version at a car show in Traverse City, MI years ago.

__________________
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

1966 GTO Hardtop - PS 14.84 @ 97mph
  #4  
Old 08-19-2019, 02:42 PM
nikrnic's Avatar
nikrnic nikrnic is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: bloomfield hills, MI
Posts: 46
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 242177P View Post
Are you talking about the econo GTO?

That was 67-69, they still used the 400.
O thanks, do you know if the 326 was available as an econo option in 1966 ? I thought it was but I can't find proof. Hmmm

Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk

  #5  
Old 08-19-2019, 02:44 PM
nikrnic's Avatar
nikrnic nikrnic is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: bloomfield hills, MI
Posts: 46
Default

Thanks 242

Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk

  #6  
Old 08-19-2019, 05:59 PM
Keith Seymore's Avatar
Keith Seymore Keith Seymore is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Motor City
Posts: 8,185
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nikrnic View Post
O thanks, do you know if the 326 was available as an econo option in 1966 ? I thought it was but I can't find proof. Hmmm

Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
No - not in a GTO.

K

__________________
'63 LeMans Convertible
'63 Grand Prix
'65 GTO - original, unrestored, Dad was original owner, 5000 original mile Royal Pontiac factory racer
'74 Chevelle - original owner, 9.85 @ 136 mph besthttp://www.superchevy.com/features/s...hevy-chevelle/
My Pontiac Story: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=560524
"Intro from an old Assembly Plant Guy":http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=342926
  #7  
Old 09-18-2019, 11:27 PM
77 TRASHCAN's Avatar
77 TRASHCAN 77 TRASHCAN is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 31May2013 Temporary home to the world's widest (that we know of) tornado. Lord, NO more Please...
Posts: 6,594
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith Seymore View Post
No - not in a GTO.

K
Mr. DeLorean got the 389 deal done on the 64's. No way he'd let a weinie 326 be install in any the later GTO's, my opinion. When he left Pontiac, there was nobody else with the 'Gnad's to get things done in the proper Pontiac manner (for the most part...)

__________________
1977 Black Trans Am 180 HP Auto, essentially base model T/A.
I'm the original owner, purchased May 7, 1977.

Shut it off
Shut it off
Buddy, I just shut your Prius down...
  #8  
Old 09-19-2019, 03:46 PM
GT182's Avatar
GT182 GT182 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New Castle, Delaware - Member of POFC
Posts: 8,833
Default

A friend had a 326 in a GTO back home up in Northern NY.... only because he blew up the 389. 326es were in the 66 Tempest, and LeMans. I had a 66 Tempest Custom HT with a 326, and it was a great running engine. The ST300 with it, not so much.

If I needed an engine in a hurry and a 326 was the only thing I could grab, yeah, I slip it in and run it. But with a Turbo 400 or a 350... but not with the ST300 that came in the automatic 66 GTOs. Better yet a 4 speed Muncie.

__________________


Gary
Get in, ShuT Up, Hang On!
Member of the Baltimore Built Brotherhood
MY GTO built 4th Week of March 1966
"Crusin' Is Not A Crime"
Keep yer stick on the ice.
  #9  
Old 09-19-2019, 06:14 PM
geeteeohguy's Avatar
geeteeohguy geeteeohguy is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Fresno, California
Posts: 5,316
Default

The 326 never came in the GTO. Base engine in '64-'66 was the 4 barrel 389, base engine (economy engine) in '67-'69 was the low compression, economy 400 with a 2bbl carb. Again, no 326 ever came from the factory in a GTO. Option 382 (GTO option) mandated a 389 engine. That said, in 1992 I picked up a decent '65 GTO with a 4 speed, 3.23 posi, and a 326.....it ran really hard for what it was. It had a cam and headers, and was a fun car.

__________________
Jeff
  #10  
Old 09-19-2019, 10:33 PM
242177P's Avatar
242177P 242177P is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,716
Default Base equipment is stuff that came standard

Quote:
Originally Posted by geeteeohguy View Post
... base engine (economy engine) in '67-'69 was the low compression, economy 400 with a 2bbl carb.
Nope. In 1967, 335 horsepower with a 'Dearborn' three speed was base. Where it went from there was up to the customer (or dealer). The 255 horse L65 was a no-cost option, and those GTOs were only available with an automatic. The TH400 option cost an additional $226. Two options. Not base.

  #11  
Old 09-20-2019, 10:10 AM
Rugratman's Avatar
Rugratman Rugratman is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Wilmington N.C.
Posts: 4,027
Default

I had a 326 in my 65 Tempest Custom convertible. The engine was a great motor.
So help me I could not hear it running at a light - with the top down. I bumped the idle up to hear it. There was no tach on those.
Great car. I miss it.

__________________
........I'm just learning as I go.......
  #12  
Old 09-24-2019, 02:02 PM
geeteeohguy's Avatar
geeteeohguy geeteeohguy is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Fresno, California
Posts: 5,316
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 242177P View Post
Nope. In 1967, 335 horsepower with a 'Dearborn' three speed was base. Where it went from there was up to the customer (or dealer). The 255 horse L65 was a no-cost option, and those GTOs were only available with an automatic. The TH400 option cost an additional $226. Two options. Not base.
R. Lee Ermey is never wrong! You are correct, of course. I confused 'base' with the lowest HP......I stand corrected.

__________________
Jeff
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:21 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017