Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-08-2018, 08:07 AM
trshman's Avatar
trshman trshman is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Church Hill, TN
Posts: 373
Default Use Windshield Washer Tank For Radiator Overflow????

Despite a PY Aluminum radiator; Flow Cooler pump and 160 degree thermostat, every now and then on hot days the radiator overflows. It's getting a little old carrying around a jug of distilled water and was wondering if anyone has ever used the windshield washer tank as an overflow reservoir and if so how that worked out. As an alternative, has anyone ever installed a separate tank in a car that didn't originally have one??
Mine is a '66 LeMans.

Any input would be appreciated. trshman

  #2  
Old 08-08-2018, 08:17 AM
OCMDGTO's Avatar
OCMDGTO OCMDGTO is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Ocean City Md
Posts: 1,198
Default

I have a small overflow tank mounted next to the radiator fill cap. It works fine and I put it on to be track legal. I have the same radiator, works great. It should stop spitting when it gets to the proper level, mine did.

__________________
Chris D
69 GTO Liberty Blue/dark blue 467, 850 Holley, T2, Edelbrock Dport 310cfm w Ram Air manifolds, HFT 245/251D .561/.594L, T400, 9" w 3.50s 3905lbs 11.59@ 114, 1.57/ 60'
  #3  
Old 08-08-2018, 10:32 AM
ZeGermanHam's Avatar
ZeGermanHam ZeGermanHam is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,927
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OCMDGTO View Post
It should stop spitting when it gets to the proper level, mine did.
This. If you keep topping off the radiator and it keeps puking coolant out when it's not overheating, you are overfilling the radiator. Just let it do its thing and it will stop leaving coolant behind when it reaches the proper level under normal conditions.

That said, the previous owner of my car used the windshield washer fluid reservoir as a radiator catch can. I recently went back to the stock setup. Setting up a catch can of some sort won't allow you to stop carrying coolant/water around (if that's your thing) anyway, since it isn't a sealed system like a modern car that uses an expansion tank which cycles "excess" coolant back into the system. The only advantage of a coolant catch can in an old car is that it doesn't leave coolant on the ground, but it doesn't prevent your radiator fluid level from dropping.

__________________

1966 Pontiac GTO (restoration thread)
1998 BMW 328is (track rat)
2023 Subaru Crosstrek Limited (daily)
View my photos: Caught in the Wild

Last edited by ZeGermanHam; 08-08-2018 at 10:38 AM.
  #4  
Old 08-08-2018, 12:31 PM
Chris65LeMans's Avatar
Chris65LeMans Chris65LeMans is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,592
Default

There's a difference between a catch can that just receives excess coolant, and a (I think it's called) a coolant recovery can that has the tube from the radiator entering in the bottom so that coolant can move back and forth as needed. I have the second kind - I removed my never-used windshield washer tub, and replaced it with this one.

__________________
1965 Pontiac LeMans. M21, 3.73 in a 12 bolt, Kauffman 461.
  #5  
Old 08-08-2018, 06:26 PM
Chief of the 60's Chief of the 60's is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: On the Rez
Posts: 3,233
Default

Washer bottles have been used as overflow bottles for decades. They sorta work but do not have good enough flow. I have a small black plastic one, like in the photo, that kind of hides next to my radiator. However, you can "catch" all you want but you will still be adding fluid if you do not run a closed system. To run a closed system you will need a closed system radiator cap.




  #6  
Old 08-08-2018, 07:10 PM
trshman's Avatar
trshman trshman is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Church Hill, TN
Posts: 373
Default

Thank you one and all. One response that hit home was that I'm probably over filling the radiator and not giving it a chance to find it's own operating level.
I've always had a tendency towards "more is better" which is another way of saying I have a tendency to overdo things . I'm going to back off a little
and see what the car tells me Thanks again everybody. trshman

  #7  
Old 08-09-2018, 04:06 PM
pfilean's Avatar
pfilean pfilean is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: West Des Moines, IA
Posts: 1,935
Default

I thought back in the old days it was common for the factory owners/service manuals to ask for coolant about 1 inch below top of radiator. Primarily before cross flow radiators. This allowed for the expected expansion when hot. And this philosophy even applied for pressure caps. Then along came closed systems with recovery tanks. This change may coincide with the change to cross flow radiators when you wanted all tubes to be full for best cooling and this required the radiator to be full. And you could add coolant into the recovery tank and it would get sucked into the radiator as necessary during cooling and keep the radiator full.

  #8  
Old 08-10-2018, 12:41 AM
NeighborsComplaint's Avatar
NeighborsComplaint NeighborsComplaint is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Elgin
Posts: 2,469
Default

Mine came out of a Camry. Fit right into a stamped recess on the radiator core.


  #9  
Old 04-25-2019, 05:16 PM
funkybird's Avatar
funkybird funkybird is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: England
Posts: 165
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pfilean View Post
I thought back in the old days it was common for the factory owners/service manuals to ask for coolant about 1 inch below top of radiator.
I would like to clarify this point after I found this thread in a search.
I’m leaking a small amount of coolant, small trail present after engine shutdown, no catch tank.
Takes about 1 pint to ‘fill’ it up, only to puke it out again...

However this ‘natural level’ that’s 1” below the rad top is just below the top of the row of the cooling tubes, so the top row is not sitting in coolant when cold.

Is that OK? I’m thinking that’s likely to cause corrosion?

Appreciate your opinion. Thanks

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:25 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017