Industry Stuff new repro's, updates, other info.

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-15-2012, 05:16 PM
Held for Ransom's Avatar
Held for Ransom Held for Ransom is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,948
Default

And yours is the 489909 unit blue71ta?

Why couldn't both versions be made? Size is the same as well as the ends, only difference is the number of wraps.

  #22  
Old 10-16-2012, 11:22 AM
Alvin's Avatar
Alvin Alvin is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pontiac Land
Posts: 3,332
Default

No worries Mrgto69, understand the broader base for customers. Feel your pain on GP 1/4s…try finding one for a ’67 GTO!

IMO: Thanks to all here for posting the Photos for the common cause. After reading several requests here on the OP I decided to reply to generate traffic to the thread... And now, I too remember those OEM “hairy” hoses and how they would turn to dust on the hose area and leave that exposed spiral metal skeleton. Literally “dust in the wind” when opening a Poncho hood.

IIRC the aftermarket’s claim to fame was to take oem designs and improve them…so: Were the Re-Pops the only ones with the metal clamps like mine, or were they used for any years on any GM’s?

  #23  
Old 10-16-2012, 12:15 PM
Alvin's Avatar
Alvin Alvin is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pontiac Land
Posts: 3,332
Lightbulb 1973 "Hairy Hose" FBrd

...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brewster View Post
...I see it still sporting its hairy hose.

  #24  
Old 10-16-2012, 01:41 PM
blue71ta's Avatar
blue71ta blue71ta is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: America's Dairyland
Posts: 1,584
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Held for Ransom View Post
And yours is the 489909 unit blue71ta?

Why couldn't both versions be made? Size is the same as well as the ends, only difference is the number of wraps.
not sure, would have to look. Is the part number on it?

  #25  
Old 10-16-2012, 05:14 PM
Held for Ransom's Avatar
Held for Ransom Held for Ransom is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,948
Default

Nope, just the box.

  #26  
Old 10-17-2012, 09:48 AM
77 Canamman's Avatar
77 Canamman 77 Canamman is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 4,022
Lightbulb

The 1973-76 cars used the 489908 hose. The 1977-81 cars used the 489909 hose. All the 1973-77 A,B,G cars used the 489909 hose.


__________________
1976 LeMans B09 Freeway Enforcer, 455/M40 Smokey

1977 Trans Am, 400/M21 Black/Gold Bandit. 44K actual miles

2017 Sierra SLT 1500 Z71 4X4

2019 Canyon SLT Crew 4X4

  #27  
Old 10-17-2012, 10:43 AM
form74's Avatar
form74 form74 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Glen Ellyn, Illinois
Posts: 1,790
Default

Here's the one off off my formula which was on the car when I got it in 99, I will let the experts decide on which version it is. Scretched out it's about 13 inches as shown.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1832.jpg
Views:	31
Size:	62.3 KB
ID:	300620   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1835.jpg
Views:	26
Size:	40.1 KB
ID:	300621   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1834.jpg
Views:	28
Size:	42.4 KB
ID:	300622  

  #28  
Old 10-17-2012, 12:22 PM
77 Canamman's Avatar
77 Canamman 77 Canamman is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 4,022
Default

Looks like the later GM or aftermarket version made from more durable vinyl. Same plastic clamps as the original issued hoses, though.

__________________
1976 LeMans B09 Freeway Enforcer, 455/M40 Smokey

1977 Trans Am, 400/M21 Black/Gold Bandit. 44K actual miles

2017 Sierra SLT 1500 Z71 4X4

2019 Canyon SLT Crew 4X4

  #29  
Old 10-17-2012, 03:05 PM
Alvin's Avatar
Alvin Alvin is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pontiac Land
Posts: 3,332
Lightbulb No Drama here as to the correct hose to mfg

The part (hose length) is close to correct – but no cigar!?

Perhaps you should do a poll for the years/body style/engine of coverage wanting to spend (my estimated $50+) for an OEM hose like the one in question?

IMO: IIRC there was quite a big installed difference VISUALLY between the “13 inch” hoses vs the much longer. IIRC something like a range of “13 to 24 inch” hose lengths. I remember the catalogs we had for GM showed quite a few different hoses (5 or more) that we stocked and assisted customers installing them.
IMO – I would reman the correct “13 inch” first. As since we are talking early to late 1970’s mostly here there will surely be more who will spend the $ for a correct 1970-1979 FBody hose vs a “too long” “fits all” odd looking squeezed together hose.

The Takeaway: No Drama here really - If it doesn’t look like one of these from an original Trans Am & Firebird, don’t bother. You will miss the market for those who will actually pay the $ to purchase the correct hoses for their Ponchos.
Ex: Like most here on PY; I’d purchase one for our 2nd T/A’s (1978 & 1979) a long-long time before I’d worry about a “correct one” for our 1973 GA. The same is true for our 1967 and 1969 GTO parts purchases – I will spend $ on those before the 1973.




Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:44 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017