FAQ |
Members List |
Social Groups |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Judge Glove Box Emblem
Has anyone been able to narrow down a time as to when "The Judge" glove box emblem actually began showing up on cars? I've got a '69 with a build date of 02C and am wondering whether or not it should have the emblem. It was restored at one time and currently has the emblem, but I'm not sure that it is correct. Also, should this car have the "GTO" dash emblem? It is a non A/C car.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Which plant was it built at? That can make a few weeks plus/minus difference...
__________________
Aut viam inveniam aut faciam 1971 Trans Am 455HO M22; Cameo White / Blue 1971 GTO Convertible 455 M40; Starlight Black / Black |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
My Arlington-built Judge has the glovebox emblem and no dash emblem. Built 04A. It also has the rear quarter extensions.
Last edited by UPC-WU2; 11-07-2005 at 08:26 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
My 02C Framingham Judge has neither the "GTO" or "The Judge" interior badging.
__________________
"My ol' man is a television repairman...he has an ultimate set of tools!....I can fix it..." J. Spicholi |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
My 03A Baltimore Judge was built with no GTO or glove box emblems.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
My Judge was built at the Freemont plant 02C. It does not have the GTO emblem on the dash, but since the dash is perfect, I suspect that it may have been redone at one time, and the emblem could have been left off.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
There was a supplier problem in early 69, therefore Judge glove box emblems weren't put on cars until sometime in early february, 1969.
To answer your first question, it is actually possible to have a Judge built prior to mid February that has both the nameplate ensignia and the emblem. I would say a build date prior to 2/10/69 would not have an emblem on it. Conversely, I doubt any Judge built after around 2/20/69 had the GTO nameplate over the heater controls. However, I don't believe any A/C cars had the dash nameplate. Hope this helps. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Taximan:
Are you saying in general Judges prior to 2/69 did not have the glove box emblem due to late production of emblem and Judges built after 2/69 did not have the dash GTO name plate because they ran out of name plates? Mine was built in 6/69 and meets your criteria (glove box emblem but no name plate). |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
The decision was made for some reason to discontinue the GTO nameplate over the heater controls. More than likely, when the supplier came through with the Judge glove box emblems, they didn't want both on the car. Besides, those GTO nameplates cost all of $2.00 in 1969. Why waste valuable money like that. Besides the GTO nameplate could be used on other GTO's.
I have never seen a February car with both, but supposedly a few were built. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
I bought my car in the 80s from the original owner and he says the emblems were never on the dash
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
My 2C Baltimore built 69 Judge (carousel/parchment) had no Glovebox Emblem or GTO emblem over heater controls in 1985 when I bought it. It has the lower quarter extension trim. Had heard for years the early Cars had the heater control emblem like regular GTO's until the glovebox emblem was ready. Supposedly you got one or the other but not both. We still learn more everyday. I would have liked them all (non-ac) to had both.
The GTO nameplate over heater controls is as hard to find as The Judge emblem, but probably not as costly. In my area, I never found one and quit looking long long ago. Would think they would be plentiful. Curious if early-early 69 non-ac GTO all got the nameplate over heater controls or if it came a little later on as well. Have a mint original glovebox emblem that will go on it anyway, since it seems to be borderline on build date acceptance. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
A February car can have any combo of above on it, and it is considered correct.
I have done a lot of research ( I know I need to get a life), and talked to a bunch of people who know more than me, and were around in 69, and a couple of things stand out: When you have a car that is built in 1969 (with tremendous time pressures on it from marketing) in 5 different plants, with probably 4 or more suppliers for many parts, nothing is cast in stone. There are many stories about Arlington built cars and how they differ more than any other. That seems to be the case. According to Paul Zazarine, the Pontiac built cars seem to be the most correct. They were the ones used as "look back" examples, and probably had the most experience assemblers, due to home office proximity. It has long been held that the rear quarter trim pieces were added around mid year. Again, that was the case at some plants, not others. More than likely a supplier issue. This is what makes GTO's so difficult to correctly and accurately concours judge. They had huge discrepancies in plant build characteristics. The U.S. model gold standard for concours judging is the Corvette. Both NCRS and Bloomington Gold. Many years of research have been used to compile judging manuals that can tell you accurate details down to the letter that should be on the top of most bolts. The reason is simple: All Corvettes came down the same assembly line between 1954 - 1981. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
This might be of some interest.
__________________
John Wallace - johnta1 Pontiac Power RULES !!! www.wallaceracing.com Winner of Top Class at Pontiac Nationals, 2004 Cordova Winner of Quick 16 At Ames 2004 Pontiac Tripower Nats KRE's MR-1 - 1st 5 second Pontiac block ever! "Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts." "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid." – Socrates |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Well that's saying it was deleted off all cars but The Judge.
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Here's my take on it.
First, from Feb 24,1969 there shouldn't be a GTO emblem on the dash. There probably was a bulletin for when the Judge emblem started. But, if you're the factory worker putting these emblems on and they said delete the emblem except for the 'Judge', does that mean don't delete the 'GTO' because it's a Judge? Or don't delete the 'Judge' emblem and delete the 'GTO' emblem? Probably kept both on until someone clarified it? Different factories interpeted it differently?
__________________
John Wallace - johnta1 Pontiac Power RULES !!! www.wallaceracing.com Winner of Top Class at Pontiac Nationals, 2004 Cordova Winner of Quick 16 At Ames 2004 Pontiac Tripower Nats KRE's MR-1 - 1st 5 second Pontiac block ever! "Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts." "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid." – Socrates |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
that bulletin you posted is not a production bulletin but a memo to service dept personnel in dealerships. the guys on the line never saw that one
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Keep in mind that during that period the Glove Box emblem would have been a popular over the parts counter piece at a price that would make us sick today. I know if I had a Judge, one of the flashiest, best marketed cars of it's time... I would have added it as soon they were available. Chic appeal and all that!!!!!!
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
emblems
my judge early feb car (1st week in feb) has no glove box emblem & has the dash emblem
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
early March car....
no "GTO", but glovebox"Judge".
__________________
"The great obstacle to discovery is not ignorance...but the illusion of knowledge." Daniel J. Boorstein "Gas is STILL your cheapest thrill!" Your opinion of me is none of my business. |
Reply |
|
|