Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-28-2013, 10:16 AM
War eagle War eagle is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,054
Default Summit cam 2801

Has anyone used the Summit 2801 cam? It was described as a replacement for the 068. Also anyone know who the manufacturer of the 2801 is? Performance gain?

  #2  
Old 01-28-2013, 11:51 AM
stockapearing455's Avatar
stockapearing455 stockapearing455 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: wilton, ca.
Posts: 172
Default

Probably a good street cam for 400 and a small cam for a 455. My friend had one in a stock 400 and it ran 14s in a stock 1971 firebird.

__________________
1968 pontiac lemans 400. 13.16@102/8.5:1 /6x-4/lunati bm 2 cam/ 3500 stall/3.55 gears.
  #3  
Old 01-28-2013, 01:13 PM
War eagle War eagle is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,054
Default

Comparing the 068 and the 2801, the 2801 has a taller lift 443/465 vs the 068 at 408/406. Almost all of the other specs are real close. (duration).

  #4  
Old 01-28-2013, 08:55 PM
Red GTO 66's Avatar
Red GTO 66 Red GTO 66 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 23
Default

It look like summit changed K2801 spec. Now it looks more like Melling 26204 or Crower 60918

Old 2801 272/282 214/224 .442/.465
SUM 2801 288/298 214/224 .444/0.466
MEL 26204 288/298 214/224 .443/0.465

  #5  
Old 01-28-2013, 10:48 PM
mkpontiac mkpontiac is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 41
Default

Something often overlooked is the lobe seperation. The 068 cam is on 116° lobe separation angle while the Summit is on 112° lobe seperation angle. If installed as recommended this puts the 068 cam intake close point at 39° compared to the Summit which is at 34°. The 068 should tolerate more compression because of the later intake closing.

  #6  
Old 01-28-2013, 11:50 PM
Tim Corcoran's Avatar
Tim Corcoran Tim Corcoran is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Willow Spring, North Carolina
Posts: 4,876
Default

The 068 was designed for more compression and higher octane fuel that we no longer have. Even if the 068 had more lift it would not be a good choice for a 9.5:1 street car that runs 92-93 octane pump gas. Yes the 068 would tolerate more compression but would need higher octane fuel too.

__________________
Tim Corcoran
  #7  
Old 01-29-2013, 01:00 PM
Scarebird's Avatar
Scarebird Scarebird is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Moita, Portugal
Posts: 5,086
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red GTO 66 View Post
It look like summit changed K2801 spec. Now it looks more like Melling 26204 or Crower 60918

Old 2801 272/282 214/224 .442/.465
SUM 2801 288/298 214/224 .444/0.466
MEL 26204 288/298 214/224 .443/0.465
I wonder if they softened the ramps for lack of zinc in today's oil?

  #8  
Old 01-29-2013, 01:34 PM
War eagle War eagle is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,054
Default

The Sealed Power CS1022R (112degree LS) is also showing the same specs. The .214/224 lift is appealing as there should be plenty of vacuum at idle. I will be keeping my 3.23 and wide ratio muncie. ( Had hopes of finding a set of used 3.36's) A clean-up bore of .030 on the 389, and stock 716 heads, this should make a comfortable street car and a 'fun once in awhile punch' to clean out the trips. I think I will try the 2801.

  #9  
Old 01-29-2013, 01:37 PM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 20,831
Default

I have the old one in a low compression 400 slight lumo at idle and runs good , like a stocker.

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune 13.43@103.4
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
  #10  
Old 01-29-2013, 01:40 PM
2002Z4CSS's Avatar
2002Z4CSS 2002Z4CSS is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Westland, MI
Posts: 3,782
Default

I have a low compression 1975 400 in my 1971 GT-37. It has a Melling cam with the same grind as the Summit 2801 cam. For an old low compression 400, this car will break the tires loose at a 30 mph roll on dry cement every time you nail the throttle. Sounds pretty good too. I have some 245/60/15 Goodyear Eagles on the back and they just love to burn off.
Here is what it sounded like just after we installed the new Melling cam/lifters. No tail pipes and some smalll 2" exhaust pipes with turbo mufflers from a 1968 Lemans we once owned. Just to make it quiet after rebuilding the engine so we can hear any noises it may have had. Click on the pictures for the video.



This is what it sounds like with the Pypes 2 1/2" Street Pro all stainless steel system with Pypes "X" pipe and splitter exhaust tips.



There is a video on the Pypes Exhaust site of my car.
http://pypesexhaust.com/gallery159.html

__________________
1971 Pontiac GT-37

Car is a junk yard dog and maybe one day will be restored.
  #11  
Old 01-29-2013, 02:19 PM
War eagle War eagle is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,054
Default

Great looking 71. I know my biggest problem will be convincing myself to alter the stock ex. manifolds. I am well aware that a set of RA manifolds are a bolt on but I was building as close to stock externally this particular 64 GTO. That cam needs some free flow by the looks of the lift. But I am not going to be racing so probably will just put her back original. In fact its balanced but I have not even replaced the press in studs. I may look RA manifolds down the road.

  #12  
Old 01-29-2013, 02:43 PM
rohrt rohrt is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 4,149
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by War eagle View Post
Great looking 71. I know my biggest problem will be convincing myself to alter the stock ex. manifolds. I am well aware that a set of RA manifolds are a bolt on but I was building as close to stock externally this particular 64 GTO. That cam needs some free flow by the looks of the lift. But I am not going to be racing so probably will just put her back original. In fact its balanced but I have not even replaced the press in studs. I may look RA manifolds down the road.
Speaking only for myself here, but the choice of exhaust manifolds (stock, HO or headers) would alter my choice of cam selection. Mainly in the lobe seperation. Tighter for the headers and wider for stock cast manifolds.

  #13  
Old 01-29-2013, 03:13 PM
Greg Reid's Avatar
Greg Reid Greg Reid is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Palmetto, GA. USA
Posts: 16,177
Default

Here is some good information posted by b-man on getting the stock logs to perform as well as the RA manifolds. http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...haust+manifold

__________________
Greg Reid
Palmetto, Georgia

  #14  
Old 01-29-2013, 07:19 PM
74Grandville 74Grandville is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Plainville, CT
Posts: 1,841
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red GTO 66 View Post
It look like summit changed K2801 spec. Now it looks more like Melling 26204 or Crower 60918

Old 2801 272/282 214/224 .442/.465
SUM 2801 288/298 214/224 .444/0.466
MEL 26204 288/298 214/224 .443/0.465
I bet they just changed the way they measure the same cam. that is the problem with advertised duration

  #15  
Old 01-29-2013, 07:44 PM
Jim Doran's Avatar
Jim Doran Jim Doran is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: New Milford,CT. USA
Posts: 1,256
Default

I have the 2801 in my 389 / tripower / 3.55 / 4spd / 77 heads with 1.65 Rockers. Pretty sure you are going to need adjustable rocker nuts with the 2801.

Performance everywhere is great ,plenty of vacuum, and zero complaints.

__________________
-Jim Doran-
1965 389 Tripower; 4 speed; convertible
2019 Tesla Model 3 Performance
2016 Chevy SS; Sold
2001 Toyota Tacoma 4x4
2008 Infiniti G35x
  #16  
Old 01-30-2013, 01:42 AM
lust4speed's Avatar
lust4speed lust4speed is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Yucaipa, SoCal
Posts: 8,726
Default

Edelbrock also has the same cam, but for twice the price. I'd bet they came off the same machine.

__________________
Mick Batson
1967 original owner Tyro Blue/black top 4-speed HO GTO with all the original parts stored safely away -- 1965 2+2 survivor AC auto -- 1965 Catalina Safari Wagon.
  #17  
Old 01-30-2013, 04:24 AM
A.J.'s Avatar
A.J. A.J. is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Linkoping, Sweden
Posts: 474
Default

Sorry for jumping in here but, would the 2801 be a good choise for my GTO, 389 4 barell, auto and 3:08 in the rear?

__________________
Reef turqoise -66 GTO
Firebird Convertible -68 R.I.P.
-73 LeMans 350/350 Barnfind
  #18  
Old 01-30-2013, 07:33 AM
Jim Doran's Avatar
Jim Doran Jim Doran is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: New Milford,CT. USA
Posts: 1,256
Default

AJ, I think the Summit 2800 is a much better fit for your combo.

__________________
-Jim Doran-
1965 389 Tripower; 4 speed; convertible
2019 Tesla Model 3 Performance
2016 Chevy SS; Sold
2001 Toyota Tacoma 4x4
2008 Infiniti G35x
  #19  
Old 01-30-2013, 02:28 PM
moontower69's Avatar
moontower69 moontower69 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 526
Default cam

For a 389 with 3.08s and an auto, I'd try the Crower 60240 (210/221 @.050) - pretty much in between the summit 2800 and 2801. With more gear, the Summit 2801 or Crower 60241 will have great performance with a 389/400 in the 8 to 8.6:1 compression range.

__________________
1974 Lemans Sportecoupe GT (daily driver)

.030 over 354, #47 heads (84cc), Lunati voodoo 700 camshaft (207/213 @ .050), logs, 2.5 duals, X-pipe and Dynomax super turbo mufflers, 3.08 rear
  #20  
Old 01-30-2013, 02:35 PM
PontGuy's Avatar
PontGuy PontGuy is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Augusta, GA
Posts: 1,677
Default

I've got the Melling version of the 2801 cam in my 455. I wanted it to idle and cruise like a stocker instead of a performance car, so did NOT want to over-cam it. The CR is somewhere around 9.5:1 but no hint of detonation (except once when I got some bad gas) so the ramps must be pretty forgiving seat-to-seat. The engine has silly-strong torque on the bottom but still pulls nicely through 5000 RPM. First and only time I took the car to the track a few months ago it ran a 13.6 without any prep and with a 3.07 posi and 3-year old Firestone Indys out back.

By no means a "racy" cam, at least on a 455, but works quite well for a street cruiser.

__________________
1969 Lemans vert, matador red, 462 CI, 3.07 12-bolt posi
1974 455 TA, admiralty blue/red interior HPP "cover car" - sold

"The best way to show a car is to drive it"
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:32 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017