Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-17-2013, 05:14 PM
njsteve's Avatar
njsteve njsteve is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,044
Default Upper radiator hose markings: Original or not?

The top photo is an original hose.



The bottom photo is the one on my 73SD. Did Gates make the original hoses or this an aftermarket replacement?


The Following User Says Thank You to njsteve For This Useful Post:
  #2  
Old 11-17-2013, 05:58 PM
2manyT/A'S's Avatar
2manyT/A'S 2manyT/A'S is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,021
Default

Here is what is on my 73....which I believe to be original????

(59K & change on the oddo......)
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	489867 upper rad hose.jpg
Views:	256
Size:	67.4 KB
ID:	343434  

__________________



Eye Candy......garage band?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUPcHxHRx3s




Go full screen & turn it UP!
The Following User Says Thank You to 2manyT/A'S For This Useful Post:
  #3  
Old 11-17-2013, 06:01 PM
njsteve's Avatar
njsteve njsteve is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,044
Default

That's another vote for "GATES" !

The Following User Says Thank You to njsteve For This Useful Post:
  #4  
Old 11-17-2013, 08:40 PM
165th's Avatar
165th 165th is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,352
Default

IMHO any original hose with 489867 is correct.

Here are some original unrestored pics of hoses I've collected.

The first pic (same pic as NJSteve's) is the Jack Nickolas low mileage unrestored 73 SD.

The second pic is a members 18K mile unrestored 73 SD.

The third pic is the '73 Florentine Red Formula SD that Tiemann restored a few years ago. It is my understanding he used a NOS hose.

In each of these examples, the GATES is not there, but I don't believe that makes a GATES hose not original. I just think both yellow GATES and non gates 489867 were used in the early years.

In later years (I don't know when but I wish I did), the stamp changed again and they went to a white hose with just RAD. The fourth pic is from a 3,000 mile '79 TATA, and the fifth pic is from another low mile '79 TA Special Edition.

One last comment, I believe the stripe and misc letters (76EX in one photo) and (6 13 3 Y in another photo) that run along the length of the hose are just identification markings from the hose manufacture, maybe even before the hoses are shaped into a part.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	73 red SD455 Jack nicholas.JPG
Views:	162
Size:	48.0 KB
ID:	343477   Click image for larger version

Name:	73 SD unrestored buc red seans s.jpg
Views:	152
Size:	73.2 KB
ID:	343478   Click image for larger version

Name:	radiator stamp tieman 2 - Copy s.jpg
Views:	154
Size:	118.6 KB
ID:	343479   Click image for larger version

Name:	489867LU 79TATA s.jpg
Views:	173
Size:	91.6 KB
ID:	343480   Click image for larger version

Name:	79 low mileage TA s.jpg
Views:	136
Size:	109.4 KB
ID:	343481  


The Following User Says Thank You to 165th For This Useful Post:
  #5  
Old 11-17-2013, 08:53 PM
165th's Avatar
165th 165th is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,352
Default

Aaannnnd..., it just so happens I can stamp the early and late hose in case anyone needs one

Also, one thing I've never seen, is an original unrestored car with the GM AU stamp on it. The last pic is my yellow stamp next to the GM AU stamp.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2150sm.jpg
Views:	138
Size:	122.0 KB
ID:	343493   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2157sm.jpg
Views:	138
Size:	66.1 KB
ID:	343494   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2443sm.jpg
Views:	136
Size:	105.7 KB
ID:	343495   Click image for larger version

Name:	489867 1 sm.jpg
Views:	176
Size:	87.5 KB
ID:	343498  

The Following User Says Thank You to 165th For This Useful Post:
  #6  
Old 11-17-2013, 09:26 PM
2manyT/A'S's Avatar
2manyT/A'S 2manyT/A'S is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,021
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by njsteve View Post
That's another vote for "GATES" !
Just curious to know your build date?

__________________



Eye Candy......garage band?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUPcHxHRx3s




Go full screen & turn it UP!
The Following User Says Thank You to 2manyT/A'S For This Useful Post:
  #7  
Old 11-17-2013, 09:36 PM
Held for Ransom's Avatar
Held for Ransom Held for Ransom is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,991
Default

And, as I like to ask, is there a date code stamped on it?
As 165th alluded to, his 6 13 3 Y decodes to June 13, 1973.

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Held for Ransom For This Useful Post:
  #8  
Old 11-17-2013, 09:44 PM
njsteve's Avatar
njsteve njsteve is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,044
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2manyT/A'S View Post
Just curious to know your build date?
Late July 1973.

The Following User Says Thank You to njsteve For This Useful Post:
  #9  
Old 11-17-2013, 09:58 PM
2manyT/A'S's Avatar
2manyT/A'S 2manyT/A'S is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,021
Default

I'll look tomorrow and see if I can pull a date code off my hose.....

My car was built March 13

__________________



Eye Candy......garage band?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUPcHxHRx3s




Go full screen & turn it UP!
The Following User Says Thank You to 2manyT/A'S For This Useful Post:
  #10  
Old 09-09-2014, 08:54 PM
165th's Avatar
165th 165th is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,352
Default

I'd like to refresh this thread, and open the dialogue to include thoughts of why there are so many known examples of the 489867 hose on cars and yet the assembly manual calls for part number 481776? It's the one part number that is consistent in all assembly manuals and yet there are few if any examples of the 481776 hose on cars? And, is 489867 ever listed in Assembly manuals?

First, some documentation that has been collected:

YELLOW 489867 RADIATOR:
NJSteve's post No. 1 shows the 489867 RADIATOR hose from the low mileage red '73 Superduty previously owned by Jack Nickolas and Gil Morgan.

Also shown is Steve's 489867 RADIATOR GATES from his '73 Superduty.

2manyT/A's post No. 2 shows 489867 GATES RADIATOR on a '73

my post No. 4 shows a members 18K mile unrestored 73 SD with 489867 RADIATOR.

WHITE 489867 RAD:
Attached is a picture I took last fall when I viewed a beautiful original paint unrestored 14K mile '74 Regatta Blue Formula 455.

my post No. 4 shows two low mile '79 TA's with the same marking.

So, with all of the documented 489867 hoses on cars, does anyone have any documented original cars with 481776 hoses?

I have seen true NOS hoses with the GM 481776 stamp but never an original unmolested car with one installed.

Any other known original 489867 or 481776 applications, please post.

Also, are there any '71 and '72 cars with original hoses on them? All of the documentation here starts at '73.

Thanks.

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	unrestored 74 regatta blue formula s.jpg
Views:	438
Size:	117.5 KB
ID:	375687  

  #11  
Old 09-09-2014, 09:39 PM
70RAlll 70RAlll is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,116
Default

I thought I would add this to Greg's post. Performance Years has a parts look up service(on the main forum page) that shows the 481776 as being correct for 71-72 TA's and up to 79 TA's. Here is a 1977 dated MPS ,Group 1.159, it as well shows 481776 correct for 71-72 and 73-76 Cars.This is a parts list just for Firebirds..ALso, here are pictures of a NOS yellow and a NOS white stamped 481776 hose.. Funny how all the MPC's show 481776,including the assembluy manuals. The other part numbers do not show up anywhere in my parts catalogs.. Nowhere?

http://www.teufert.net/partbook/67-76/1-p.pdf


The 1st two pictures are of a all yellow '776 hose, the last 2 are of one with white number stamp, but yellowish EB numbers stampings..so the white hose actually has yellow and white stampings??
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4526.jpg
Views:	108
Size:	33.7 KB
ID:	375694   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4528.jpg
Views:	116
Size:	40.0 KB
ID:	375695   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4545.jpg
Views:	114
Size:	35.3 KB
ID:	375696   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4546.jpg
Views:	100
Size:	43.8 KB
ID:	375697  

  #12  
Old 09-09-2014, 09:52 PM
Held for Ransom's Avatar
Held for Ransom Held for Ransom is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,991
Default

http://www.forums.maxperformanceinc....d.php?t=567373

I thought it was determined that the 1776 was a cut to fit application, ususally dated starting in late '75.

  #13  
Old 09-09-2014, 10:19 PM
165th's Avatar
165th 165th is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,352
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Held for Ransom View Post
http://www.forums.maxperformanceinc....d.php?t=567373

I thought it was determined that the 1776 was a cut to fit application, ususally dated starting in late '75.
Wow, HFR, your search engine is awesome! This thread didn't come up when I did my search.

What's interesting about all this information in '08 and again now is, there still isn't any original cars with 1776 installed. But what's equally interesting is, I don't think there are any '71 or '72 documented hoses on either thread. It would be nice to see an original hose on a '71/'72.

Thanks also to Bill for posting a couple of nice examples of the NOS 1776 hose.

  #14  
Old 09-09-2014, 11:05 PM
70RAlll 70RAlll is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,116
Default

Greg.. looks like I stirred up a hornets nest.. anyway, saw in the thread HFR referenced someone commented that the 481766 hose may be the replacement hose for the 489867.. I sort of doubt that. The 481776 hose was in the 1972 MPC. Here is a copy of the page, showing a rev date of 7-72.. Pretty current to the 71/72 model year cars..??

well hell. PY's file size keep me from loading this.. Let me try and take a picture and load that way..
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4588.jpg
Views:	426
Size:	64.3 KB
ID:	375702  

  #15  
Old 09-09-2014, 11:40 PM
Formulabruce's Avatar
Formulabruce Formulabruce is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North East of AMES PERFORMANCE, in the "SHIRE"
Posts: 9,398
Default

My 2 cents, This 1st pic below is NJSteve's hose. I have never ever seen one like it and "suspect" a problem. To my knowledge there were no hoses made by Gates with a small "i" in the word radiator, second pic is the Known original. Later hoses from Gates had just "RAD". Its Just an Observation, doesnt mean you can take it to the bank, but worth looking into..FB


__________________
"The Future Belongs to those who are STILL Willing to get their Hands Dirty" .. my Grandfather
  #16  
Old 09-09-2014, 11:45 PM
Formulabruce's Avatar
Formulabruce Formulabruce is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North East of AMES PERFORMANCE, in the "SHIRE"
Posts: 9,398
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 70RAlll View Post
Greg.. looks like I stirred up a hornets nest.. anyway, saw in the thread HFR referenced someone commented that the 481766 hose may be the replacement hose for the 489867.. I sort of doubt that. The 481776 hose was in the 1972 MPC. Here is a copy of the page, showing a rev date of 7-72.. Pretty current to the 71/72 model year cars..??

well hell. PY's file size keep me from loading this.. Let me try and take a picture and load that way..

__________________
"The Future Belongs to those who are STILL Willing to get their Hands Dirty" .. my Grandfather
  #17  
Old 09-09-2014, 11:58 PM
bossbirdta's Avatar
bossbirdta bossbirdta is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ca.
Posts: 1,038
Default

FWIW, this is said to be from a 71 survivor T/A with just over 20K original miles... it looks like it could be an original hose????
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	1971 Trans Am 22K.jpg
Views:	144
Size:	62.1 KB
ID:	375711  

  #18  
Old 09-10-2014, 01:03 AM
70RAlll 70RAlll is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,116
Default

This is getting strange.. another part number that doesn't show up in the MPC?? That one shows a date of 155th day 1969.. could these be Chevrolet part numbers??

  #19  
Old 09-10-2014, 07:50 AM
njsteve's Avatar
njsteve njsteve is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,044
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Formulabruce View Post
My 2 cents, This 1st pic below is NJSteve's hose. I have never ever seen one like it and "suspect" a problem. To my knowledge there were no hoses made by Gates with a small "i" in the word radiator, second pic is the Known original. Later hoses from Gates had just "RAD". Its Just an Observation, doesnt mean you can take it to the bank, but worth looking into..FB

I took a closer look with a magnifying glass and it is not a small "i". Upon closer exam it is a big "I" with some of the ink thinner in that spot. Original photo was taken with a flash which partially washed out the image.

  #20  
Old 09-10-2014, 01:48 PM
Formulabruce's Avatar
Formulabruce Formulabruce is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North East of AMES PERFORMANCE, in the "SHIRE"
Posts: 9,398
Default

AH, Glad that came out ok Steve, super Sleuth!! sorry for the alarm .

__________________
"The Future Belongs to those who are STILL Willing to get their Hands Dirty" .. my Grandfather
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:23 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017