70 T-37 Engine options?
 

Could you order a base 400 or any of the Ram Air engines in a 70 T-37, Tempest, or Lemans?

It could be ordered with a 400 4bbl. There is great debate over whether it was the base GTO engine or the RA III. If you do a search you can probably find more.

General consensus is auto's had base engine. However when it was the 4 speed model then it becomes a bit more blurred. OPH probably will have more insight.

But no T-37 could be ordered with "Ram Air"
i.e. holes in the hood and cold air induction.

It is nonsensical to ask if you could order a "base 400" in a 1970 T-37, Tempest, or Lemans." Not saying this to yank your chain, but to try to clear up some confusion about these cars.

The model series offerings in 1970 were the 33 series Tempest, the 35 series Lemans, and the 37 series Lemans Sport. Specific Body Styles were offered within each series.

One thing I am not entirely clear about was the use of the T-37 badging. I do not know if perhaps the T-37 badging was a mid-year addition or if all 1970 33 series cars were badged as Tempest T-37, or if only the 2 dr. models (Style Code 23327 and 23337) got the T-37 badging. Whatever the case may be, the Tempest and the T-37 were not independent model series, they both pertained to the 33 model series. I believe the 2 dr. hardtop body style was a mid-year addition to the 33 model series offerings, touted as the lowest price 2 dr. hardtop intermediate in the industry (not including similar offerings from other GM Divs.) owing to the rubber flooring (carpet was an option), bench seat, etc.

A "base" configuration indicates the standard "no option" choice. In the case of the 33, 35, & 37 model series Pontiac A bodies for 1970, the base engine was a 6 cyl.

You could order optional V8's (a V8 was a mandatory additional option if you wanted the GT-37 Appearance Package Option available for the 23327 & 23337), starting with a 2 bbl 350 and moving on to the 2 bbl 400 (available with auto trans only) or a 4 bbl 400. For the 4 bbl 400 with auto trans, you got a non-GTO 400 which used the cast code 16 small valve heads (which were NOT the same as the '68 cast code 16 heads).

With manual trans you got the same code WT engine that was the base motor in the manual trans GTO.

In the past, it has been suggested that the man trans engine was the code WS, the RAIII GTO engine. This confusion was reportedly a result of John Sawruk once suggesting that the man trans 4 bbl 400 in a GT-37 was "essentially" the same as the Ram Air III motor. Not sure if he really stated that, or what he might have intended by it if he did say it. Perhaps it was because they both used the cast code 12 heads. But the most exceptional feature of the WS code motor was the HO exhaust manifolds and the WT lacked those, so was not "essentially" the same motor.

The Ram Air paraphernalia was not part of the engine assembly itself, Pontiac could have offered the WS code motor in a T-37 without having to include the Ram Air Hood and plumbing. But they didn't.

The top engine option for the '70 Tempest or Lemans then was a 4 bbl 400, the auto trans version was the XV code and was not shared with the GTO, the man trans version was the WT which WAS shared with the GTO.

John, Good to see you chime in on this. There has been and probably be much discussion regarding the "T-37" moniker". As we have discussed and seen the T-37 in another thread here it was the "Tempest T-37" badging. In '71 it was "Pontiac T-37" but msrp stated "LeMans T-37".

I think we all still wonder where the "T-37" really came from. Kind of like todays 'G-6" and "G-5". or any other letter/number name plate. Unless there is discovered somewhere, in writing, we probably will never know. It was the first Pontiac of the modern era to have a name plate that has not been discovered what it 'really' means. I think!!

"All American Classics" in Vancouver WA has several early T-37's in it's yeard, two years ago I stopped in and pulled a 1111148 distributor from a 1970 T-37.
That is definatly a 1970 L78 "YS" (350hp) - I do not have my McArthy book anywhere nearby to verify if the 1111148(L78) distributor was used in any G/P, or Tempest/Lemans specific version of the L78.

I don't know if all non-Ram Air 4 bbl 400's were UPC L78 for '70.

But my reference shows the 1111148 distributor for all 4 bbl auto trans 400 engines except RAIII and RAIV for '70 (all applications, A body, F body, and big car). So it should be a pretty common distributor. Engine codes with this distributor would be XH for the big car including GP, XV for the A body (except GTO), and YS (GTO & F body).

As outlined previously, you could not get the YS code engine in a non-GTO A body for '70.

The T-37/ GT-37 line did not come out til very late in the '70 model year. Somewhere in paperwork I have a copy of the memo (thanks Rocky) noting the intro of the GT-37. It's dated in late May 1970.

Trusting originally installed points distributors, as to what engine was under them originally under... well, not that smart. Trusting MPC's is even worse. Assembly workers @ the engine plant didn't always follow what was supposed to be installed when it came to distributors.

OPH, the '70 Tempest T-37 Hardtop Coupe didn't come out "very late in the '70 model year". It was available many months before late May.

The GT-37 was simply an option, not a specific model series. You are correct that the availability of this option was not announced until pretty late, though more than 2 months of production were still to come when it was announced in May. Still, it WAS a relatively late offering for the 33 series Hardtop Coupe and also offered for the 33 series 2 dr. Coupe (post), a model which had been available for the entire model year. Point is, availability of the T-37 Hardtop Coupe and the GT-37 option package were two separate things. Your post suggests they were tied together.

To get the GT-37 option, Pontiac required that a V8 engine option also be ordered. The late addition of the GT-37 option package had no bearing on what optional engines were offered for non-GTO Pontiac A bodies in '70 (33 series, 35 series, and 37 series) however, and that is the subject of this thread.

I stand by my assertion of which engine codes were possible in these cars.

As to the usage of the 1111148 distributor, if you are assuming I referenced an MPC, you are mistaken. My reference is derived from Delco Remy documentation.

I never doubt that mistakes were made during assembly. But I am also familiar with the Engineering Deviation and Engineering Change Notice procedures which is a better explanation for many of the variances we might come across today. An Engine Plant line worker who was unable to consistently install the correct distributor (either the current specified unit or a permitted Deviation) matched to the Engine Manifest Code of the unit being assembled was unlikely to last long.

I have no reason to suspect that unruhjonny came across anything but a correct XV code motor in a '70 A body with optional 4 bbl 400 and auto trans and the expected distributor was pulled out of that engine.

I have every reason to believe that this is a fairly common distributor since Pontiac would have produced quite a few '70 XH engines and this would also be the expected distributor in those engines. My point was to make unruhjonny aware that the engine in that '70 was unlikely to be a YS engine because the YS was not offered for the non-GTO A body (sure, a GTO engine might have been swapped into it) but that whatever the engine was that he pulled the distributor from, that distributor was not exclusive to the YS as he thought possible.

I don't charge for information, if I think I can be helpful to somebody here, I share what I know and if it is an opinion, I try to make that clear. IMO, too many opinions parade as facts. If it is your opinion that I don't know what I'm talking about, you're entitled to it. If you have facts that contradict what I have posted, just post them. Expressing an opinion for the purpose of casting doubt on what I posted without actual facts isn't helpful to me, I don't think it is valuable to anyone I am offering help to on this thread either.

John:

I have come to sincerely appreciate your insight and (obviously) thorough knowledge concerning Pontiacs.

I've never seen any references concerning your experience, would you mind sharing how you gained your insight?

Many thanks in advance!

Badging...
 

We had a 1970 Tempest 2dr. Coupe, a post car, when I was 12 or so. It only said Tempest no T-37. We bought it in September 1969, it was a 350 2bbl. Only other options were wheel discs and these big fat tires. It had no carpet and it had a plate covering the radio hole, seem to remember the speedo went to 140 mph. I assume it was made in Oshawa but don't know for sure. It was real cheap, like $2,900 or so. I know my Dad could burn rubber for half a block. I liked that car.

Thanks John for the info! - I might have not been clear, but my referance to the "YS" was becasue that was the only L78 engine (aka: standard 400/4bbl) code that I knew off hand (for some reaon I really only keep Firebird info handy!).

Here's a related question:

I often hear of the GT-37;
Was the GT-37 the same package but on a Lemans instead of a Tempest (like the T-37)?
- I don't know of any information resource that explains the differnces between a GT-37 or T-37... or if the GT-37 phased out he T-37.

My 1971 Pontiac model line brochure doesn't even mention (to my recollection) the T-37... but it definatly does mention the GT-37.

I had always understood that in 1970 the "big-dog" of the motors available to the "regular" sized coupes (except G/P, GTO, and Formula/Trans Am), was the L78...

Not as interesting a story as you might think. Just a hobbyist like most here. Started in 1973. Bought a one owner, well worn '64 GTO convert for $135. Picked it because Special Interest Autos said it would be collectible one day, I needed a car, wanted a convertible, and it had to be cheap.

I just like solving puzzles and playing with numbers. Cars basically have always fascinated me. And I'm a glutton for anything associated with old Pontiacs.

So whenever there is some mystery associated with a Pontiac, I just find it fun to figure out the answer. It isn't rocket science, most Pontiacs were produced in high volume and you can usually collect info from a lot of cars to discover the answer you want. What I tend to be good at is interpreting the info to find the answer.

I'm just a car guy. Everybody has their particular interest within the hobby. One of mine is figuring out answers to all sorts of Pontiac questions.

BR57 & unruhjonny, I suspect your posts would have fit better at the other T-37 thread:

http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=462966

BR57, would be no surprise to me if only the Tempest 2 dr. Hardtop Coupe got T-37 badging in '70. I can't say about the 140 mph speedo, but think 120 is more likely. Even 120 seemed like a lot when speedos later stopped at 80 mph in some cars.

unruhjonny, you have to consider each model year independently when it comes to model designations. And it is often better to think in terms of the Model Series rather than the nameplate badging.

As stated in the earlier post, the GT-37 was an option package in '70. It was available for the 33 Model Series Tempest with either the Body Style 27 Coupe (post style) or Body Style 37 Hardtop Coupe. It was NOT available for the 35 Model Series Lemans, 37 Model Series Lemans Sport, or 42 Model Series GTO.

The 33 Model Series Hardtop Coupe came out later in the Model Year and was badged in '70 as the Tempest T-37. It is a bit uncertain if ALL '70 Tempest Hardtop Coupes got the additional T-37 badging, but I think the answer is yes. There is a '70 T-37 announcement folder which shows a Hardtop Coupe without T-37 decals. I have speculated that this may have been a stock photo of a post Coupe which was airbrushed to look like a Hardtop Coupe. In '68, Pontiac used a photo of a post Coupe GTO for the Woodward Ave. ad but airbrushed it to appear as a Hardtop Coupe, so it wouldn't be unprecedented.

The GT-37 was a sporty appearance dress-up package, it was not an actual model series. It required any available V8 as a mandatory additional option.

In '71, things changed. The 33 Model Series remained, but the Tempest badging was dropped altogether. From what I can gather, Pontiac considered the 33 Model Series the Lemans T-37, as noted on the Window Sticker of these cars. To my knowledge the badging only said T-37, no mention of Lemans, and the T-37 nameplate applied to all three Body Styles offered in the 33 Model Series line; Coupe, Hardtop Coupe, & 4 dr. Sedan.

The GT-37 continued to be offered as an option package, but now it was ONLY offered for the 33 Model Series in the Body Style 37 2 dr. Hardtop Coupe. At mid year, Pontiac changed the Rally Stripe option for the T-37 Coupe and Hardtop Coupe. The new stripe was also used with the GT-37 option.

The fender badging for the T-37 included a Pontiac nameplate with a T-37 nameplate below that. The Rally Stripe was an eyebrow style, available for 2 dr. styles only. The GT-37 simply exchanged the T-37 nameplate for a GT-37 nameplate and the eyebrow style stripe was included as part of the package.

The mid year stripe was sword style. For the T-37, I believe the nameplate badging was unchanged. But with the GT-37 option, the new sword style stripe incorporated the GT-37 callout within the stripe aft of the front wheel well, the T-37 nameplate was deleted.

The 33 Model Series was dropped altogether for '72. All that remained was the 35 Model Series (VIN plate designation "D") and was called the Lemans. The GT-37 option package was morphed into the GT option package and was available for the Lemans in the Body Style 37 2 dr. Hardtop Coupe and Body Style 67 2 dr. Sport Convertible (which was also VIN designation "D" but 38 Model Series on the Body Data Plate).

I believe your '71 literature should fully describe the T-37 and mention the GT-37. The literature may not be clear about the GT-37 being an option package, but the manner in which it was ordered makes that fact clear.

John V,
Articulated very well. I'm cheering for you......you need 2 more post on this forum to change your status from Member to Senior Member.

Pictures say it better...
 

....:cool:

John, I have been watching these 2 T-37 posts for quite some time. I haven't posted anything because I am learning more about these cars than I can contribute. My 70 was produced 4/70 although there was a repaint before I got it which would explain the t37 decals missing if it originally had them. I have the original dealer to customer invoice and nowhere does it mention t37. Tempest only. I do not see anywhere where the 350 badging would have went. The car is an original 350/350. I have had the car almost 6 years and I have learned more about it here in the last year or so. Thank you all.
Even though its not a GTO, I still enjoy the car. I don't see many tempests in this area only GTOs and Lemans.

Hmmm...I could have sworn I've seen a 71/72 Tempest (wit hthe script badgeing) driving around... mabey I'm gonna have to pay more attention to this.

Thanks John!

unruhjonnyu, if it is a '71/'72 and says "Tempest" on it it is incorrect. The word "Temptest" was never used after the '70 model year. T-37 was never used after the '71 model year.

All 350/400's received badging in the lower fender/rocker panel area. But there is always the possibility that the callouts were never put on some cars. Mine comes to mind immediately.. We have learned to never say never, especially when someone has photo proof.

were there canadian built cars that might have retained the "Tempest" badging? - would the vin tell me if it's a Canadian built car? (I'm guessing it would)

My previous opinion was that I prefered the '70 Tempests because the 71-72 'Tempests' all had the same bumper as a 70-72 Lemans; and I liked the smaller bumper to begin with...

The more I look into these cars, the more I like them.

Canadian cars?...yes
 

I am no 70-72 Tempest/T-37/GT-37/LeMans GT/ LeMans/ LeMans Sport/GTO expert but I do know these cars were built here in Canada. 1970's were I believe built in Oshawa which is plant #1 in the VIN. I believe 1971 and 1972 cars were built at Ste.Therese which is plant #2 in the VIN. I have never seen a 1970 with a Chevrolet V8 engine but 1971 and 1972 cars did get Chevrolet V8 engines.

My 1970 GM Canada brochure says that Tempest was only available as a 2dr. Coupe or 4 dr. Sedan. This is different from a lot of information posted here that says a 2dr. Hardtop was available in 1970 as a Tempest or T37.

Going from memory I believe I have seen 1971 Tempest's here and think that it was not until 1972 that GM Canada went to the T-37 designation and in fact may have used these designations concurrently.

So unruhjonny you may be correct. GM Canada often produced different models and trim levels, especially in the Pontiac line. Chevrolet powered Strato Chief, Laurentian and Parisienne are all models offered in Canada only in those days. The 2+2 was available through 1970 with Chevrolet engines, 327, 350, 396, 427 and 454. Remember also that 1970 was the first year that the Tempest/LeMans was offered in Canada, replacing the Beaumont line of cars sold by Pontiac.

BTW, GTO's were only made in Oshawa in 1970 and 1973. GTO's made in Canada never got Chevrolet engines, always Pontiac. Beaumonts however only got Chevrolet engines with 396 being the largest V8 offered.

Tempest used by GM Canada into the 90's
 

GM Canada used the name Tempest on Pontiacs for a long time. Just saying that in Canada marketing and names are different so as has been said here already, "never say never" Wikipedia says Pontiac retired the Tempest name forever in 1971 but that's just not true. The link below shows some for sale today:

http://www.canadatrader.com/result/r...icedOnly=false

Well, they quit badging Pontiacs with "GTO" after 1974. Yet, you can find examples built around the world that were badged "GTO" in the years since (and not just the recent Aussie version).

For '70-'72, it is my understanding that Pontiacs built in Canada were identical to those built at US Final Assembly Plants. The VIN coding would identify the Final Plant as Oshawa but same Style Codes as used in the US. UNLESS they were built as so-called Canadian Pontiacs, in which case they were specifically built for the Canadian market and not sold in the US. I've never quite understood whether a Canadian Pontiac was supported by Pontiac in the US or by Chevy, or perhaps they had their own independent Divisional structure with styling and design done in Canada. In other words, did Pontiac (US) design them or were they developed outside the control of Pontiac (US).

AFAIK, '70 GTO's built at Oshawa were not strictly for the Canadian market. Except perhaps for some minor differences resulting from local vendor production of parts, such a GTO should be virtually indistinguishable from one produced by a US Final Plant. And the car sitting on a new car dealer lot in Wisconsin might have come from Oshawa as easily as from Pontiac, Mich.

In this case, if we are talking about Pontiac (US) A bodies, I believe the Tempest badge disappeared after '70 and was not applied on any car whether it was built in Canada or the US. If Canada produced a car after '70 and put Tempest badging on it, it was a Canadian market only car. It may have resembled a US Pontiac A body but would have been distinctly different, I would assume complete with unique Style Codes & VIN's.

I'm sure some Canadians have a better knowledge of that history than me and I would like to know if I am off-target.

I agree with 1970
 

I agree with your asessment of the 1970 cars but the 71 and 72 moved to Ste. Therese for production and they definitely got Chevrolet V8 power. They also got Pontiac power depending on what you ordered, a 400 for example, but a 350 was usually a Chevy small block. These cars were likely not exported to the US. Anyway there are tons of Canadian only market cars with destinctive trim and badges, just need some real oldtimer to chime in who may have worked for the General who would know for sure. Lots of Canadian built Oldsmobiles got Chevy parts too by the way. Canadian Buicks were originally McGlaughlin Buicks and were built by the McGlaughlin Carriage Works. These Buicks are known for their quality and craftsmanship. Colonel Sam McLaughlin was President of GM Canada up to 1945 and GM Canada is wholely owned by General Motors US, so I'd say control of what happens here is in the US board room. Current GM Canada President is a US Citizen as far as I know. Recognizing a different culture and making products to meet it's needs is just good business I suppose.

I was in South America recently and saw plenty of GM models I never saw here and I mean cars and trucks from the 50's, 60's and 70's.

Acadian SS? Pontiac Wave? Grand Parisienne? Beaumont SD? a 1973 Astre? I think these are all Canadian only cars too, not to mention those 1990 Tempests linked above.

Ha - a re-badged chebbie Corsica.

John, Giving 2nd hand documentation like Delco info is what gives me a great big chuckle. Very typical of the bookworm car experts that love to go on & on paragraph after paragraph flowing a stream of truths mixed in with their own opinions. Opinions are like #ssholes, everyone has one. My personal research data on T-37 & GT-37 production is VERY far reaching, I've yet to run across anyone who was willing to go the extra mile for such hands on information. Beginning with hands on recording of data in the mid '80's, this quest has not diminished at all over the last 20 years. Data which has encompassed hundreds of VIN's, cowl tag data, castng dates, assembly numbers, stamped date codes such as bumper dating & fender piercing codes has all been recorded.

One thing that has never been proved, ever in yarding through hundreds of yards over this country, is that '70 T-37's were introduced early in the Spring of 70. In correspondence to 100's of GT-37 survey respondents I've always used the Spring of '70 as a basic timeline. Late May of '70 is much closer. Just going through the last 5 years data, every original '70 T-37 I've examined had a body build date of 05D or later. GT-37's parallel the same trend.

Distributors, for the last 18 years I've been ck'ing & pulling original Pontiac distributers. Many for retail, others like the 1112008 as a part of the specialty core end of my restoration services business. What's a specialty core... with certain core parts like the "2008", I'm more concerned about the original internal parts being intact vs selling the distrib to an end user as a "2008". Over these years, I've noticed certain trends with what engine plant assemblers installed in original engines. In certain cases, like the ''1952" for '69 models, very often the engine that original engineering sheets, close dated MPC's, & even Delco manuals says a certain distributor is supposed to be in, has proven to be wrong! This also has proven true in respects to distributors like the 1148 & the 2007, esp late in the production year.

Without hands on documentation, we would all be reduced to supposition & going by what partbooks said. Am thankful I had a flexible job in the mid 80's & the ability to be out in the yards working a ton & documenting as I went along. This time really skyrocketted in '89 when I left punching another man's clock. Owe alot of my interest in "numbers" to buying my 1st GT-37 & even though it had been off the road since '78, the mysterys it presented in chasing down correct parts.

Maybe?
 

Are we sure? Maybe a Corsica is a re-badged Pontiac Tempest? The chicken or the egg, nobody knows? LOL.

all I know is that this summer I'm gonna pay close attention to any "Tempests" that have the 70 Lemans/GT-37 type bumpers... mabey I'll even record the vins of some 71-72 cars, because I know I will see a couple.

quote:
John V.
"In this case, if we are talking about Pontiac (US) A bodies..."

This is the root of my posting.
I do not necissarily see USA vs Canadian built cars seperatly, and since I'm surrounded by "Canadian" car's 351 days a year (presuming 2 weeks of holidays state-side) I am not always aware of specific differnces between some Canadian vs USA built models...

If no one told me that an Acadian/Beaumont was a Canadian specific Model, I wouldn't have though for another second about it.

But working under the premise that on the other side of the 49th, the "Tempest" namplate was dropped after model year 1970, that would stand to make sense as to why I saw so many T-37's at All American Classics (Vancouver WA).

Before this thread, I had always percieved that a T-37 was a "roadrunner" for Pontiac -> a step above Tempest, which was a trim level below a Lemans... I thought that the GT-37, was a more loaded version of the T-37...
To further elaborate, I understood that (in concept) the T-37 was to the GTO like a Formula is to the T/A; a gauranteed V8, and not much else -> with no 'comfort' options being included... (this parralell really works when comparing the 71-74 Formula to the T-37, because the L30 was the standard engine for those years of Formulas)

Wasn't the Tempest badge also used for a rebadged Suzuki (also presumably sold as a Geo) in the late 80's or early 90's? (or was that a Lemans?)

Jonny - FYI - ALL 1970 Pontiac A-body cars used the exact same front bumper, excepting the GTO of course. Same with the '71-'72 Pontiac A-body cars - all had the same front bumper, unless one ordered the T41 endura appearance package or a GTO.

The T-37 was not conceived to compete with the Roadrunner, but rather simply a rebadge for the aging Tempest nameplate. Beginning in 1971 1/2 Pontiac offered the Ventura II as their entry level offering, and therefor the "usefulness" of having a rubber mat cheapie A-body lost it's marketing appeal. Thus the Tempest AND T-37 monikers went away after 1971, leaving the LeMans, LeMans Sport, GTO and the LeMans GT to carry the Pontiac mid-size banner.

The GT-37 probably was born to compete with the Roadrunner. No way the GT-37 with it's base 350 2V would ever be able to compete with the Roadrunner's base 383 4V though. Simply a young person's entry level performance appearance package, unless optionally equipped of course!;)

Lloyd, you are absolutely correct. I think the magazines are the ones responsible for promoting the T-37 as a Road Runner competitor. I believe it merely was a "spring special" Tempest to kick start sales.

Of course, the GT-37 was the Road Runner competitor, coming from the ashes of the stillborn ET.

T-37 = Price Leader
 

T-37: Began life as the cheapest, least equipped, six-cylinder econo car for retired folks, starting families or others who wanted basic transportation but wanted a Pontiac nameplate.

GT-37: Began life as alternative to GTO. Had 8 cylinder standard, 3 speed floor shift, Rally II wheels, dual exhausts, hood pins and some stripes. Offered as entry level Pontiac muscle car to under 30 market segment who could not afford price of a GTO or insurance premiums of GTO.

This was the marketing position of the model nameplates, however, most options available throughout the line could be ordered. This is how one finds T-37's with 400's or 455's or FM radios or A/C or whatever.

AND the T-37 w/455HO our RR'd the RR, GTO'd the GTO, SS'd the SS, SCJ'd the SCJ, 442'd the 442, etc., for '71.

LOL