PY Online Forums - Bringing the Pontiac Hobby Together

PY Online Forums - Bringing the Pontiac Hobby Together (https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/forums/index.php)
-   68-69 GTO Tempest & LeMans TECH (https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=433)
-   -   GTO Auction List Scottsdale 2013 (https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=718276)

GTO JOHN 01-16-2013 12:54 PM

GTO Auction List Scottsdale 2013
 
There are 20 GTOs scheduled to go over the block during the 2013 edition of Barrett-Jackson. Since 10 of them fall into the 68-69 year range I decided to post the list here.

Interesting there is only 1 Judge being offered that is going off Friday night. Also only eight lots later, a RAIV convertible is being sold.

Here is the list by date. (Not sure how to pinpoint the actualy TV time)

Tuesday
1969 PONTIAC GTO 110 http://www.barrett-jackson.com/appli...ln=110&aid=466

Wednesday
1964 PONTIAC GTO 426 http://www.barrett-jackson.com/appli...ln=426&aid=466
1968 PONTIAC GTO 523 http://www.barrett-jackson.com/appli...ln=523&aid=466
1965 PONTIAC GTO 526 http://www.barrett-jackson.com/appli...ln=526&aid=466
1968 PONTIAC GTO 530 http://www.barrett-jackson.com/appli...ln=530&aid=466
1969 PONTIAC GTO 543 http://www.barrett-jackson.com/appli...ln=543&aid=466

Thursday
1970 PONTIAC GTO 670 http://www.barrett-jackson.com/appli...ln=670&aid=466
1967 PONTIAC GTO 696 http://www.barrett-jackson.com/appli...ln=696&aid=466
1967 PONTIAC GTO 787.1 http://www.barrett-jackson.com/appli...=787.1&aid=466

Friday
1968 PONTIAC GTO 928 http://www.barrett-jackson.com/appli...ln=928&aid=466
1965 PONTIAC GTO 935 http://www.barrett-jackson.com/appli...ln=935&aid=466
1964 PONTIAC GTO 962 http://www.barrett-jackson.com/appli...ln=962&aid=466
1967 PONTIAC GTO 976.1 http://www.barrett-jackson.com/appli...=976.1&aid=466
1969 PONTIAC GTO 1004 http://www.barrett-jackson.com/appli...n=1004&aid=466
1970 PONTIAC GTO 1005 http://www.barrett-jackson.com/appli...n=1005&aid=466
1969 PONTIAC GTO JUDGE 1013 Judge http://www.barrett-jackson.com/appli...n=1013&aid=466
1969 PONTIAC GTO 1058 RAIV Convertible http://www.barrett-jackson.com/appli...n=1058&aid=466

Saturday
1967 PONTIAC GTO 1294 http://www.barrett-jackson.com/appli...n=1294&aid=466
1969 PONTIAC GTO 1306.1 http://www.barrett-jackson.com/appli...1306.1&aid=466

Sunday
1969 PONTIAC GTO 1567 http://www.barrett-jackson.com/appli...n=1567&aid=466

Don't worry fellas, I did not get a bidders pass.....:usa2:

GTO68FXSTC98 01-16-2013 01:57 PM

1 Attachment(s)
GTO's and Pontiacs in general get no love at BJ. A restomoded Camaro or a cloned Mustang will sell for more than a numbers matching GTO. I still watch it thou, I love looking at all types of cars. Did you see that 1929 model AA duelly with a wooden flatbed Tuesday night? That thing was cool.

2manyponchos 01-16-2013 02:12 PM

Way too many 400-4 air cleaner stickers!

Seriously, a 4000 mile GM Heritage car still on MSO until this year...and it has the air cleaner sticker. Maybe they really were factory issue...lmao!

Greg Reid 01-16-2013 05:25 PM

Doesn't that Sunfire Red '64 belong to a member here? Either that or someone here has one very much like it...and it's such a seldom-seen color...

69 RA GTO 01-16-2013 05:44 PM

Wow, 2 69 RA IV GTO Converts. I love that Warwick Blue with Black Vinyl top 69 GTO listed. Thanks for posting the links John

nytrainer 01-16-2013 07:23 PM

I count 39 assorted GTO's hitting the auction block in Kissimmee (Mecum Auctions) starting this Friday!!

bsblguy 01-16-2013 09:49 PM

I want a 69-70 gto but don't have the kind of money they go for at those auctions.

Andretti 01-16-2013 10:13 PM

Wow, that red '69 Ram Air IV convertible is beautiful! Thanks for the links.

twingtos 01-16-2013 11:11 PM

I cannot stand those stuipd CID stickers on the air cleaners. Someone needs to tell the "100% Factory Restored" people that they never came from the factory with those. Ugh!

Ok rant over.

Some VERY nice looking cars.

bsblguy 01-16-2013 11:16 PM

Lot 1004 has one of those stickers and says the car is a 4000 mile car always owned by gm. Or did I read that wrong?

GTO JOHN 01-16-2013 11:51 PM

Something is not right with lot 1004 IMO. The description given in the write up does not make sense given the facts below.

They claim an all original car untouched with 4,000 miles. If true, consider these facts:

Z101043 is an early production car probably built in Sept 68. This GTO has a Ram Air pan installed which means it is a factory Ram Air car? The earliest known Ram Air III was built in Dec 68. If it is not a factory RA car, then the lower pan was added making it not "untouched" Not to mention the decal which was obviously added recently if it had been in the GM museum all these years. The lid looks chromed in the picture to me, maybe its the lighting, but if it is chromed that is a no-no for a correct Ram Air lid.

Also the front seats have repro seat covers on them. Kind of unusual for only 4,000 miles. Steering wheel cover? why if it was never driven.

Cowl screen covers are the plastic 70 style covers I have onyl seen them on late 69s. An early Fremont car would have the chicken wire screen over the cowl opening.

Wheels appear to be 14x7 with wider trim rings.

GTO fender emblems don't appear to be body color on the bars which means probably a repaint.

I don't see original exhaust extensions and I would think those would still be there on a 4,000 mile car.

An early production car (vin Z101043) with a Judge spoiler?
and without lower rear rocker trim?

It is a nice car, but don't try to fool us Pontiac guys with nonsense.

C'mon Man!!!

bsblguy 01-16-2013 11:55 PM

I think you need to go shopping with me gtojohn, now all I need is some money.

bigborehunter 01-16-2013 11:57 PM

Missing engine lift ear on water pump as well. Lots of little things wrong on this MSO car.

The Boss 01-17-2013 08:36 AM

Nice to see all the numbers matching cars make their way to Scottsdale. :rolleyes:

Bruce Meyer 01-17-2013 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GTO JOHN (Post 4832693)
Something is not right with lot 1004 IMO. The description given in the write up does not make sense given the facts below.

They claim an all original car untouched with 4,000 miles. If true, consider these facts:

Z101043 is an early production car probably built in Sept 68. This GTO has a Ram Air pan installed which means it is a factory Ram Air car? The earliest known Ram Air III was built in Dec 68. If it is not a factory RA car, then the lower pan was added making it not "untouched" Not to mention the decal which was obviously added recently if it had been in the GM museum all these years. The lid looks chromed in the picture to me, maybe its the lighting, but if it is chromed that is a no-no for a correct Ram Air lid.

Also the front seats have repro seat covers on them. Kind of unusual for only 4,000 miles. Steering wheel cover? why if it was never driven.

Cowl screen covers are the plastic 70 style covers I have onyl seen them on late 69s. An early Fremont car would have the chicken wire screen over the cowl opening.

Wheels appear to be 14x7 with wider trim rings.

GTO fender emblems don't appear to be body color on the bars which means probably a repaint.

I don't see original exhaust extensions and I would think those would still be there on a 4,000 mile car.

An early production car (vin Z101043) with a Judge spoiler?
and without lower rear rocker trim?

It is a nice car, but don't try to fool us Pontiac guys with nonsense.

C'mon Man!!!

Not to mention the AC unit has been messed with. Aftermarket POV valve. Looks like Evap is aftermarket. It has a funky bend in it.

Andretti 01-17-2013 09:41 PM

...aftermarket coolant TVS switch, no tstat crown nut...

Bill Meyer 01-17-2013 10:42 PM

I cannot understand the 400-4V decals on all the AZ cars. Since retirement, I spend winters in AZ and go to lots of car shows. Some Pontiac "God" must have put one on at one time, because they seem very convinced that they are correct.
I was at Barzaks deal @ Speedworld and many were present. On Saturdays, I go to the pavillions and see a bunch more. One guy has a very nice '69 Vedero green car, correct down to the spring ring battery cables, but he will not remove his 400-4v decal.
One of the car jockeys(high-end) was selling a beautiful '67 hardtop. This car was georgous-well done as Speedvision would say, but nothing would convince Lynn that that 400-4V wasn't correct. I thought maybe I was the only one the got irritated by this decal, but by reading these comments see I'm not alone!! -Bill- end of rant-

3goats 01-18-2013 12:24 AM

I can't believe that nut bolt restoration on the 69 Judge. Did they not do any homework on a GTO JUDGE?
Being a Judge guy I'm almost embarrassed for that car to go in public. JMO
No offence but really?

68pongto 01-18-2013 01:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3goats (Post 4833515)
I can't believe that nut bolt restoration on the 69 Judge. Did they not do any homework on a GTO JUDGE?
Being a Judge guy I'm almost embarrassed for that car to go in public. JMO
No offence but really?

What you don't like the CR underside of the hood? How about the incorrect manual master cyl. with the disc brake valve! Or maybe the handle on the battery, sticker on the alt, plus the nice air cleaner decal, just to name a few!

twingtos 01-18-2013 02:56 AM

I noticed the incorrect cowl covers (should be the chicken wire), but I cannot really fault them for putting that on it. I hated the way it looked on my judge, and when I came across a set off a 70 car, I couldn't replace it fast enough. I am not sure why any manufacturer would think that was a good idea.

Are the engine edge of the fenders supposed to be body color, or should they be black as well?

"How about the incorrect manual master cyl. with the disc brake valve" How can you tell that?

68pongto 01-18-2013 11:59 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by twingtos (Post 4833559)
"How about the incorrect manual master cyl. with the disc brake valve" How can you tell that?

Um, real easy. Disc brakes in 67-69 used a double bail master cyl. that was much larger. That is not even a correct master cyl. for drum brakes. I would be afraid of how those brakes would even work!

Here is a pic. of what a disc brake master cyl. looks like

Attachment 310105

3goats 01-18-2013 03:08 PM

There's a few more

68pongto 01-18-2013 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3goats (Post 4833878)
There's a few more

radiator hose, power steering hose, cowl screens, wrong or dented lh radiator tank, decals on core support and air cleaner, wipers are not parked in correct spot, brake booster is not re-plated! There's some more. "undergone a complete professional rotisserie restoration.............This car is top tier museum and show quality. Every nut and bolt on this car has been touched, restored or replaced to as if it just rolled out of the factory" Yeah, sure, whatever you say! Gotta love some of these ads!

68pongto 01-18-2013 08:25 PM

104k for the Judge with all stuff wrong in the engine compartment!

Diego 01-18-2013 10:11 PM

The RAIV ragtop . . . Expresso Brown?

se428bandit 01-18-2013 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Diego (Post 4834259)
The RAIV ragtop . . . Expresso Brown?

They couldn't get the color right on TV.Expresso Brown look nothing like Verdoro Green.

rare4k 01-18-2013 10:48 PM

Wow that 69 ram air IV convert did not do alot I think, I had one in 89

68pongto 01-18-2013 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by se428bandit (Post 4834271)
They couldn't get the color right on TV.Expresso Brown look nothing like Verdoro Green.

yeah, I had to laugh at that one!

bigborehunter 01-18-2013 11:35 PM

What did the Expresso Brown convertible sell for?

steve v 01-18-2013 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigborehunter (Post 4834337)
What did the Expresso Brown convertible sell for?

Click on the links in the first post & the sold price is listed.

Barrett-Jackson Lot: 1058 - 1969 PONTIAC GTO CONVERTIBLE
1969 PONTIAC GTO CONVERTIBLE

Detailed Information
Lot Number: 1058 Auction: SCOTTSDALE 2013
Status: SOLD
Sale Type: NO RESERVE
Price: *$106,700.00
Year: 1969 Make: PONTIAC
Model: GTO
Style: CONVERTIBLE
VIN: 242679Z117924
Exterior Color: EXPRESSO
Interior Color: WHITE
Cylinders: 8 Engine Size: 400
Transmission: 4-SPEED MANUAL

bigborehunter 01-19-2013 12:23 AM

Got it, thanks

68pongto 01-19-2013 12:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigborehunter (Post 4834337)
What did the Expresso Brown convertible sell for?

97k before buyers premium

Diego 01-19-2013 12:47 AM

Before I saw the color, I could have sworn they said it was black, but either way they got the color wrong. I saw that car in Scottsdale a few years ago and thought it was gorgeous. If I had the money, I would have bought it.

hobi 01-19-2013 09:05 PM

decals
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill Meyer (Post 4833429)
I cannot understand the 400-4V decals on all the AZ cars. Since retirement, I spend winters in AZ and go to lots of car shows. Some Pontiac "God" must have put one on at one time, because they seem very convinced that they are correct.
I was at Barzaks deal @ Speedworld and many were present. On Saturdays, I go to the pavillions and see a bunch more. One guy has a very nice '69 Vedero green car, correct down to the spring ring battery cables, but he will not remove his 400-4v decal.
One of the car jockeys(high-end) was selling a beautiful '67 hardtop. This car was georgous-well done as Speedvision would say, but nothing would convince Lynn that that 400-4V wasn't correct. I thought maybe I was the only one the got irritated by this decal, but by reading these comments see I'm not alone!! -Bill- end of rant-

im in arizona 20 years 6 1969-1970 gto convertibles no decals on any of my cars guess i am not a pontiac guru

Bill Meyer 01-19-2013 11:18 PM

Hobi - You are my HERO!!! Please help spread the word. No more 4V decals!!
Hope to see your cars at a show sometime - I'll know which ones are yours
- Bill -

bigborehunter 01-20-2013 12:11 AM

I brought up that phoney decal issue on my blog on the B-J GTOs.
It really rankles to see them on a nice car.
http://phscollectorcarworld.blogspot.ca/

Greg Reid 01-20-2013 12:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigborehunter (Post 4835029)
I brought up that phoney decal issue on my blog on the B-J GTOs.
It really rankles to see them on a nice car.
http://phscollectorcarworld.blogspot.ca/

That's a very nice blog. You are a prolific writer.

bigborehunter 01-20-2013 01:46 AM

Thanks, 13 years in the classic car journalism business and 17 years in the auto industry prior to that leaves you with some interesting stories. Blog will always have a wide range of topics including motorbikes but Pontiacs and muscle cars will predominate.

Wakepowell 01-20-2013 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GTO JOHN (Post 4832693)
Something is not right with lot 1004 IMO. The description given in the write up does not make sense given the facts below.

They claim an all original car untouched with 4,000 miles. If true, consider these facts:

Z101043 is an early production car probably built in Sept 68. This GTO has a Ram Air pan installed which means it is a factory Ram Air car? The earliest known Ram Air III was built in Dec 68. If it is not a factory RA car, then the lower pan was added making it not "untouched" Not to mention the decal which was obviously added recently if it had been in the GM museum all these years. The lid looks chromed in the picture to me, maybe its the lighting, but if it is chromed that is a no-no for a correct Ram Air lid.

Also the front seats have repro seat covers on them. Kind of unusual for only 4,000 miles. Steering wheel cover? why if it was never driven.

Cowl screen covers are the plastic 70 style covers I have onyl seen them on late 69s. An early Fremont car would have the chicken wire screen over the cowl opening.

Wheels appear to be 14x7 with wider trim rings.

GTO fender emblems don't appear to be body color on the bars which means probably a repaint.

I don't see original exhaust extensions and I would think those would still be there on a 4,000 mile car.

An early production car (vin Z101043) with a Judge spoiler?
and without lower rear rocker trim?

It is a nice car, but don't try to fool us Pontiac guys with nonsense.

C'mon Man!!!

You hit on a bunch of the issues with this car. I spent a few minutes looking at it last night and there is either a whole lot of embellishment in the description or out right fraud. The list of things wrong with this car could fill pages in this thread....

Stuff you couldn't see on TV:
Pitted interior window molding, glass installed with modern black sealer not butyle tape, after market front and rear windows, broken defroster ducts in the dash, and much more....the added rear spoiler was also off center by at least an inch...


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:23 AM.