PY Online Forums - Bringing the Pontiac Hobby Together

PY Online Forums - Bringing the Pontiac Hobby Together (https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/forums/index.php)
-   Pontiac - Race (https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=419)
-   -   Dyno Time (https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=873003)

gman005 04-06-2024 09:31 AM

Dyno Time
 
Tomorrow i am finally taking my engine to the dyno.
Its a 535 MR1 with 430 Highports BOP intake and a 1300 Prosystems carb.
14to1 compression running vp113 fuel.
Lets hear your guesses on what it will make.

tom s 04-06-2024 09:46 AM

Try 925HP.Tom

PAUL K 04-06-2024 09:53 AM

Good luck!

grandam1979 04-06-2024 10:19 AM

900ish

J.C.you 04-06-2024 10:40 AM

Lot of r&d on the heads and intake, cam? If so 1000.

Scott Stoneburg 04-06-2024 10:47 AM

905hp, 725 lbft tq.

gman005 04-06-2024 10:57 AM

Old cam 278 intake and 292 exhaust on a 114 cl it made 920hp

gman005 04-06-2024 10:59 AM

New cam
 
1 Attachment(s)
Pic of cam card.

Scott Stoneburg 04-06-2024 11:16 AM

Whew!!! That's a healthy cam! What ratio rockers are you using?

gman005 04-06-2024 12:01 PM

1.65

charlie66 04-06-2024 06:14 PM

Hey John, 910HP ..

BILL BOWMAN1 04-06-2024 06:42 PM

1020

gman005 04-06-2024 07:09 PM

Hey Charlie. I hope it's not less than before. Lol.

Scott Stoneburg 04-06-2024 08:17 PM

I'll revise my guess, given more info about the previous Dyno and cam specs, 975hp

ponjohn 04-06-2024 08:42 PM

955h / 820t

slowbird 04-06-2024 10:15 PM

What's the difference between this build and previous one?

Tim Corcoran 04-07-2024 01:50 AM

945 HP 790 TQ

R 70 Judge 04-07-2024 02:59 AM

Nice build!

983 hp :drive:

gman005 04-07-2024 06:00 AM

New cam, steel rods and heads.

steve25 04-07-2024 08:20 AM

Why that 113 on that cam?

I don’t think such will help your VE, but non the less I hope you reach your target power numbers.

slowbird 04-07-2024 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gman005 (Post 6496691)
New cam, steel rods and heads.

Compression the same? Heads same except new?
If those are same and basically just the cam change I'll guess 940-950

Scott Stoneburg 04-07-2024 09:57 AM

New steel rods? Did you have Aluminum rods previously?

PAUL K 04-07-2024 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steve25 (Post 6496708)
Why that 113 on that cam?

Pp.

Hi Steve.... That 113 is the intake centerline

Gary H 04-07-2024 12:52 PM

117 LSA on the cam. I'll say 1020 HP.

BILL BOWMAN1 04-07-2024 01:31 PM

I thought it read .630 lobe-old eyes! I’ll still say about a grand!

gman005 04-07-2024 07:15 PM

I'm not going to post any numbers but it was down 50hp with this cam. I'm going to make a few passes with it and see then put the old cam back in.

slowbird 04-07-2024 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gman005 (Post 6496841)
I'm not going to post any numbers but it was down 50hp with this cam. I'm going to make a few passes with it and see then put the old cam back in.

I ran pretty much that same cam from lsm in mine, ran great. Sucks it didn't work out for you. Good luck this season.

PAUL K 04-07-2024 09:38 PM

That's disappointing..... Sorry to hear that.

Scott Stoneburg 04-07-2024 10:14 PM

That stinks bro, get a couple of runs to make sure the Dyno wasn't having a bad day

Stan Weiss 04-08-2024 08:58 AM

From my standpoint it is hard to say what is happening due to lack of specs.

535 ci

1) 920 HP (what RPM), 278 intake and 292 exhaust on a 114 cl (what LSA), what heads (flow and valve size), what CR

2) 870 HP (what RPM), 284 intake and 306 exhaust on a 113 cl (117 LSA), what heads (flow and valve size), what CR

Do run a power adder on this engine?

Stan

slowbird 04-08-2024 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stan Weiss (Post 6496910)
From my standpoint it is hard to say what is happening due to lack of specs.

535 ci

1) 920 HP (what RPM), 278 intake and 292 exhaust on a 114 cl (what LSA), what heads (flow and valve size), what CR

2) 870 HP (what RPM), 284 intake and 306 exhaust on a 113 cl (117 LSA), what heads (flow and valve size), what CR

Do run a power adder on this engine?

Stan

Not sure if he'll post much more info. But looking at the differences in the heads before and now would be a good starting point imo. He stated only changes were cam, rods and heads. Out of those 3 I'd pick heads as the issue. But not much info to go on here.

gman005 04-08-2024 10:28 AM

The new heads are supposed to be the 430 cnc port from Kauffman same as the old heads. Compression is at 14 to 1.

gman005 04-08-2024 10:41 AM

The new heads were bare and everything was transferred from the old heads to the new heads.

Stan Weiss 04-08-2024 11:27 AM

At what RPM does the engine my 920 peak HP?

Stan

gman005 04-08-2024 12:08 PM

7200 rpm

Money Pit 04-08-2024 01:36 PM

Your new cam is virtually the same as my Bullet nitrous cam. I'm running 1.75 rocker ratio. My LSA is 115 installed at 113.

gman005 04-09-2024 03:56 AM

I am going to do a leak down test today after work.

steve25 04-09-2024 05:49 AM

I was going to say what Slowbird did, the heads are the issue.

If your leak down test shows ok then why even go thru the work of putting the motor in the car to make a few passes if the new motor is not even the equal of the old one?

I guess your stuck with it for this race season, or do you still have the old heads?

grandville455 04-09-2024 11:38 AM

That’s a bummer John! Where did the new heads peak this time? Same dyno as last engine? Can u share any of the dyno sheets maybe there’s something there that will help decipher what happened

steve25 04-09-2024 11:44 AM

I would also like to add to Stan's list of questions if you know how much vacuum was made at peak hp and the BSfC numbers from the dyno sheet?

J.C.you 04-09-2024 11:48 AM

Factoring no mechanical issues with the motor, Track time is a better indicator of power since he already has a reference point if the car is basically the same.

steve25 04-09-2024 12:06 PM

True!

gman005 04-10-2024 04:00 AM

Well the leak down test was anywhere from 4 to 13%. Nothing going on internally. I will try and do a compression test today.

johnta1 04-10-2024 06:53 AM

If the only changes were cam, rods and heads, I'd say the combo needed tuned to those new changes? Intake specs to work with the heads, carb change to work with the new specs, cam wrong for head specs etc.?


What was the afr, bsfc, rpm range etc?


:confused:

PAUL K 04-10-2024 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnta1 (Post 6497249)
If the only changes were cam, rods and heads, I'd say the combo needed tuned to those new changes? Intake specs to work with the heads, carb change to work with the new specs, cam wrong for head specs etc.?


What was the afr, bsfc, rpm range etc?


:confused:



I believe the heads were direct replacements for the original KRE heads that cracked.

I'd be looking to see if the porting program was changed to prevent the cracking issue. This problem was in a critical area of the port. Could easily knock down the power numbers considerably.

johnta1 04-10-2024 10:37 AM

Thanks, I thought with the heads they were ported for more flow than previously. (why he changed the cam also)


:)

bluegoat65 04-10-2024 12:57 PM

Good call by Paul. That would suck if thats the case. The High Ports gotta be paper thin at 430. Hate to say, but maybe move your program into the "Super Wedge head" territory. Your easily at that level.

Stan Weiss 04-10-2024 01:49 PM

JMO It is the new cam.

Stan

gman005 04-10-2024 02:22 PM

I talked to Jeff yesterday he said that the new port program shouldn't have hurt it. We all know how that goes.

gman005 04-10-2024 02:39 PM

I changed the cam hoping to pick up a little.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:47 AM.